The Regulated AI Agentic RWA Settlement Layer for Tokenized RWAs. Powering humans + autonomous AI agents with licensed infrastructure. t.me/ixsfinance
Global
- Tweets 7,098
- Following 904
- Followers 30,983
- Likes 5,477
Binance Research's CAR figure is the number to sit with: roughly $12 of every $100 in tokenized RWAs is deployed onchain.
The rest is held, not used.
The cap on that number gets set at issuance.
A token that can only move between approved wallets can only be deployed in venues that enforce the same approvals.
Permissionless pools can't, by design. So the eligibility rules written into a token decide how far its CAR can ever go.
Two things raise CAR without new supply:
→ permissioning that travels with the token, not the venue
→ holders that move capital between uses. That is an agent's whole job.
We run both sides of that line: one vault, a permissioned KYC route and a permissionless route agent wallets deposit into directly.
PAR counts what gets on. CAR counts what the rules let it do once it's there.
RWA growth is no longer just about bringing assets on-chain.
📈 $34.18B RWA AUM
🚀 Equities +390.4% YTD
🔗 Capital activation up across key asset classes
The next chapter of tokenization is making assets useful—not just accessible.
Welcome to the RWA Activation Era. 👇
binance.com/en/research/anal…
1
10
66
2,206
A chatbot that reasons badly gives you a wrong answer.
An agent that reasons badly with custody of tokenized RWAs gives you a loss.
That's why we're partnering the RWA Vaults track, and we've already seen some great submissions come through.
Still building? Agents that hold, route, and earn yield on real-world assets. Reliable enough to trust with capital.
3 days left. Submissions close Sep 28. ⏰
AI agents won't scale on intelligence alone. Reliable reasoning is critical for enterprise-grade execution.
Got an agent, workflow, or application? Add SERV Reasoning, improve reliability and performance - join the hackathon.
Submissions close Sep 28: openserv.ai/hackathon
2
24
120
3,415
IXS retweeted
When the big end of town starts drawing x402 diagrams, agents transacting onchain isn't a CT thesis anymore, right?
BlackRock's research team mapped the whole agent payment stack. MCP, A2A, x402, stablecoins to spend, bitcoin to save.
The box I'd add is the agent's treasury. An always-on agent is always holding a float, and the second that float wants yield it's holding a security. KYA stops being a check and becomes a holder-of-record question.
That's the bit we built. Agentic vaults, MCP compatible, x402 supported, licensed issuance underneath.
Our latest research paper explores the growing connection between AI and digital assets and explains why broad AI adoption may drive new demand, utility and applications across the digital asset economy. blackrock.com/us/individual/…
8
18
82
2,392
jordi's frame is the right one:
the debt was accrued on human time, the balance sheet behind it is moving to machine time and the next liquidity expansion shows up in velocity before it shows up in M2.
he also names the catch. a tokenized fund still has a redemption leg.
here's that catch in production:
→ our vault shares settle 24/7, onchain, across 8+ EVM chains
→ the funds underneath still redeem T+1 to T+2
so the velocity gain lives in the share, usable as collateral while the redemption clock runs.
and an agent only gets to pledge it if something already decided it's allowed to hold it. for a tokenized security, that permission is set at issuance.
ours sits under the DARE Act.
As promised
Why tokenization + AI will shift the macro debate from money supply to money velocity.
When Wealth Becomes Money: Why Crypto Matters for Economists
As Steve Jobs said, "here's to the crazy ones" - Think Different
visserlabs.substack.com/p/wh…
1
10
61
2,513
when @julian2kwan and vlad meet after 6 months of TG messages
Everyone should be able to access high-quality financial assets, wherever they live.
That's what tokenization unlocks: taking the best of US capital markets and making them available on a global scale.
The industry is still small compared with global finance, but the advantages are becoming harder to ignore. Traditional market infrastructure was built around fixed hours, closed networks and layers of intermediaries. It was never designed for 24/7 execution, programmable assets, composability or self-custody.
The needs of investors have moved faster than the rails underneath them. We're working to change that.
What gives me confidence is seeing how many different people are now pushing this industry forward. Founders are building new products, LPs are bringing liquidity, traders are finding new uses, and infrastructure teams are making the whole thing work.
It's a privilege to be in the trenches with all of you.
We are still early, and there is a huge amount left to build. It will also take time and effort for the old guard to get onboard. This is worth fighting for.
6
15
113
7,026
IXS retweeted
The agentic economy will be powered by SERV.
SERV Reasoning is live: enterprise-grade AI infrastructure for developers.
Entirely new markets, products, and apps will emerge around autonomous agents. Build before v3 → v4 takes SERV further.
Apply: openserv.ai/hackathon
17
43
184
11,761
IXS retweeted
Sammy is right that issuing the token is the easy half.
Without inventory on both sides you have a screenshot, not a market.
Deeper pools fix price impact though, right, they don't fix who is allowed in the pool. Robinhood's stock tokens are debt instruments issued out of Jersey, economic exposure to the underlying, no ownership of it, and they are not available in the US at all. Put ten times the reserve behind those markets and you have not created one new eligible buyer.
That is a permission problem. It gets answered at the issuance layer or it doesn't get answered.
Same thing one level down on the agent point in part 4, which I think is the most interesting thing in the whole thread.
Robinhood Chain's own copy says agents can trade, swap and lend against tokenized RWAs. Fine. An agent still isn't a natural person, so somebody has to answer who the holder of record is.
Liquidity does not answer that. We have been answering it on our own vaults under issuance and it is the least glamorous part of this entire business.
This could get pretty insane!
Standard wants to become the "liquidity engine" for Robinhood’s stock markets
If it executes, this extends well beyond the current $STANDARD protocol + could attract SIGNIFICANTLY larger institutional players
There's also some pretty interesting implications...
1) What we know: Standard explicitly intends to fund and coordinate stock-token liquidity
Its manifesto says it will create + approve markets, seed liquidity, coordinate external capital and return trading fees to the reserve
The intention is to build a capital base that supports multiple markets
If those positions generate profits, retained earnings could fund further deployments
Standard’s published reserve snapshot shows roughly $14M across reserve vaults + protocol-owned liquidity
That includes locked STANDARD liquidity, so the entire amount is not available for stock-market deployment
The significant development is where the protocol wants to earn its revenue... thank god for a return to fundamentals (while still tied to memes)!
Funding stock-token markets could give Standard income from trading activity across the wider RH ecosystem, reducing its dependence on activity around its own token
2) This could strengthen an advantage that competing chains would find difficult to replicate
Robinhood brings stock-token issuance infra, its brand + an established wallet
A deeper onchain liquidity network could make those assets more useful across trading, lending + portfolio applications
Issuing a token is only part of the job... Traders also need enough inventory and capital on both sides of the market to execute meaningful orders without substantial price impact
Other chains already have tokenized equities, like xStocks, pre-Stocks etc. but RH’s potential advantage is the combination of distribution, stock access, liquidity + apps developing together (eg. on top of STANDARD??)
If better execution attracts more trading, and profitable trading finances deeper markets, that advantage could compound BLOODY quick
A competing chain would need to attract the users, inventory + capital behind that activity
3) How this impacts other RH protocols
Existing RH protocols could become both beneficiaries AND competitors
i) Launchpads such as Pons & Long could benefit where their markets depend on stock tokens supported by deeper underlying pools
Buying the stock needed to enter a meme/stock pair could become cheaper, although the meme pair would still need sufficient liquidity itself
ii) DEXs + aggregators could route trades through markets Standard funds
iii) Liquidity managers could potentially manage positions or bring additional capital alongside the reserve
There would also be competition over deposits, trading fees and which markets receive funding
Existing treasury and liquidity protocols would need to demonstrate where they add value through execution, distribution or risk mgmt.
The ecosystem gains most if Standard attracts fresh capital and supports additional activity
Moving the same capital between existing pools would deliver a smaller benefit
4) ALPHA: The reservoir could support another generation of apps
i) An index product could rebalance stock-token portfolios against deeper markets
ii) A lending protocol could use those markets to liquidate collateral more efficiently
iii) Options/perps platforms and market makers could use them to hedge exposure
iv) AI agents could execute portfolio strategies across the same pools, adding another source of trading demand
These are potential applications, NOT announced Standard integrations
They would still require their own contracts, pricing systems + risk controls
The attraction for builders is access to usable markets without having to recruit every liquidity provider themselves
For Standard, applications using its funded markets could generate fees that help replenish the reserve
I’m watching for the first actual deployments, their returns after costs, & how those earnings benefit $STANDARD holders
That will show whether the reservoir can become a lasting source of liquidity for RH
This is probably one (if not THE) most interesting protocol emerging, that could entice a fresh bout of institutional capital into this mini RWA bull
Time to start paying attention!
1
10
63
3,635
IXS retweeted
Yeah look, agents trading real accounts through an MCP server is the part most brokers are still writing memos about. Fair play.
Your own help page is honest about the limit though. The agent can trade, it can't transfer, stake or lend. So it sits in cash between trades earning zero, and the human still has to go do the yield part by hand.
That gap gets louder when gas stops being free and people start asking what the balance is doing on the days it isn't trading.
We've had this chain scoped for a while.
Licensed yield-bearing RWAs, ERC-4626, already live across EVM chains, so for us it's more like a deployment and not a build. Agent holds the share token, earns while it waits, trades out when it wants to.
You asked to hear from builders. We're past the memo stage too.
Incredible to see the surge in new dev teams building on Robinhood Chain.
The ecosystem is expanding by the day. If you’re building on the chain, we want to hear from you.
1
6
52
1,348
The hard part of building an agent that manages capital isn't the agent.
It's that almost nothing onchain is both real yield and legally holdable by a machine.
That's the gap we built for. SERV brings the reasoning, we bring the assets.
Tuesday with @open_founder.
AI agents will manage trillions in capital across financial markets.
Join the Spaces on Sep 22 with OpenServ Founder & CEO @open_founder and @IxsFinance CEO @julian2kwan, to explore what developers can build with SERV - across RWAs, tokenized stocks, automated trading, and more.
As AI takes on increasingly complex financial decisions, managing real capital at scale requires better decision-making. With SERV Reasoning, developers will finally be able to build smarter, more reliable agents.
Build the future of agentic finance today, and join the 1st SERV Hackathon: openserv.ai/hackathon
Set your reminder below.
4
34
169
5,674
Everyone's reading 24/7 as a UX upgrade.
It's a market structure rewrite. Corporate actions, dividends, borrow, and market making all assume a close exists.
Matching trades at 3am Sunday is the easy part. Servicing them isn't.
Hence a year of testing, not a pilot.
BREAKING: NYSE plans to bring 24/7 trading on chain with their in-development ATS platform
“As we’ve evaluated different platforms, Avalanche checks a lot of those boxes for us, so we’re very engaged with the team”
- Michael Blaugrund of Intercontinental Exchange/NYSE
3
8
66
2,809
IXS retweeted
yes, @100y_eth is right about the consolidation and the vault call is the part worth arguing about.
he has vaults as a next generation primitive, feeding capital into RWA-collateralized lending.
fine. then ask what it takes to ship one. perps, prediction markets, memecoins, that is engineering.
stablecoins, that is banking relationships, which is harder but doable.
the RWA leg needs a licence and a licence takes years and a regulator who returns your calls. which is why the stacks all end up looking the same and that one piece keeps getting rented from somebody else.
we run the rented part. licensed issuance, permissioned and permissionless vaults, a broker dealer route for US investors.
the other thing, right. every product in that converged five was built for human demand. he says new categories can still show up.
agents are not in that list yet ;)
As the number of viable markets narrows, companies and projects that started from very different positions are converging on the same set of products.
1
7
46
1,388
Congress punted. The SEC patched.
Five years, capped volume, issuer veto, revocable by the next Commission.
1
11
90
2,131
The founders who last are the ones who name the team.
Audits, controls, the regulated plumbing...none of it gets built by a founder. It gets built by people who never post about it. Good to see them named.
Onwards.
Great work from the @IxsFinance team audits are a serious responsibility and necessary to run regulated infrastructure, onwards
1
11
103
3,196
See you in a 3 hours ⏰
Link to Telegram in bio.
Arc mainnet goes live Wednesday, with BlackRock, DTCC, Visa and Mastercard running validators on it.
In October, DTCC's tokenization service goes commercial on Canton. IXS runs a node there.
In January, the GENIUS Act takes effect and stablecoin issuers can no longer pay yield to holders.
Three events and they all run through the same question.
Where does regulated onchain yield actually come from, and who is licensed to issue it?
CEO @julian2kwan is going live for an AMA:
🗓 Thursday, 17 September
⏰ 7PM SGT / 11AM UTC
1
5
75
3,403
RWA holder count more than doubled in the last 30 days. +107%
Tokenized stocks are the entire reason. 3.6M of the 4.4M total hold one, up 155% in a month
The onboarding wedge for real-world assets was never treasuries. It was retail equity access.
rwa.xyz, 16 Sep 2026
5
13
97
2,234