Thereโs a privacy problem hiding inside one of the most basic questions in crypto
โprove you have the moneyโ
if you answer onchain, you can point to your wallet
but now the other side can see the wallet too
@primus_labs is approaching this differently with zkTLS
instead of revealing the underlying financial data, you can prove a specific threshold was met
the flow is pretty straightforward
โ log into the exchange or custodian through a normal HTTPS session
โ an attestor verifies that the session is authentic
โ no login credentials or raw account data are exposed
โ you receive a signed attestation saying something like โbalance above Xโ
โ a smart contract verifies that attestation onchain
the counterparty gets the information they actually need, without automatically getting the information they don't
that's a subtle but important change in how financial verification can work
and it's already being applied to proof of reserves for Unitas USDu
their dashboard combines attested offchain hedge balances with onchain positions
the catch is that this isn't permanent proof
an attestation represents one verified snapshot, so anything that needs to stay true has to be re-attested over time
Join Primus here:
s.kaito.ai/imYMgiu
I think @FungoLabs is onto something that NFTs have been missing for years.
The problem with most NFTs is that the moment something interesting exists, the entire internet can see it.
Rare trait? Scraped
Hidden rank? Indexed
Special ability? Someone already knows
Thereโs basically no room for an actual secret
Fungo is approaching this differently with encrypted NFTs on Ethereum, powered by Zamaโs FHE.
The NFT can stay encrypted on-chain, and the holder decides when the underlying essence gets revealed.
Even the team canโt see whatโs hidden
Thatโs the part I find genuinely interesting
This isnโt just putting a privacy label on an NFT
It gives digital ownership another dimension: information you control because you own the asset
Seen by everyone
Known by one
I like that idea
Applications open โ fungolabs.org/apply
One detail in the @axisrobotics docs deserves more attention than I initially gave it
every submitted trajectory receives a unique data ID and is associated with both the exact task and the contributor
the record is then anchored onchain on Base
that's important because it turns provenance into part of the data architecture rather than a separate metadata layer
so the reported 2.1 million trajectories aren't simply an aggregate count
in principle, individual records can be traced back to the contributor and task that produced them
that creates a much stronger foundation for understanding where training data actually comes from
especially for robotics, where the quality and context of a trajectory can matter just as much as the trajectory itself
most AI datasets don't give you this level of visibility into the origin of every sample
you get a collection of data, but the chain of custody is often unclear
Axis is taking the opposite approach
the provenance is created at the moment the data enters the system
that's a small architectural decision that could become a very important one as the dataset scales
Join Axis here: s.kaito.ai/69icJQQ
Been seeing more people talk about minds.games lately, and I finally started paying attention.
Thereโs something about the MDG ecosystem that feels like itโs still early enough to be interesting.
Not trying to force a narrative here, but I definitely want to see what theyโre building before everyone starts talking about it.
who else is keeping an eye on MDG? ๐
At some point, saying โwe need more robot dataโ stops being the interesting part
@axisrobotics may be getting close to that point
100,000+ trajectories generated every day means the system is no longer operating like a traditional data collection project
it's becoming a continuous production engine
humans generate experience
simulation expands it
models create feedback
the next round gets better
and when that loop runs at this scale, the real challenge moves somewhere else
how do you separate useful signal from noise?
how do you turn it into training data for VLA and world models?
and most importantly, how do you make what one robot learns useful for another embodiment?
that's where Axis's work around selective DAgger, simulation-real co-training and shared datasets becomes important
because the end goal isn't having a huge folder full of trajectories
it's building an infrastructure where robotic knowledge can keep being generated, refined and transferred
Physical AI becomes much more interesting when data stops being something you occasionally collect
and starts becoming something the system continuously produces
Join with me here:
s.kaito.ai/69icJQQ
Thereโs an interesting opportunity developing around YT-onyc on @ExponentFinance right now
The base APY is roughly 11%, compared with an implied APY of around 12.9%, and that spread makes the current pricing worth looking at
A $1K $ONyc position can produce around 214K @onrefinance points daily while generating close to $8.46 in yield each day
If held until maturity, thatโs roughly $839 in total yield and about 21M points
After subtracting the yield generated, the effective cost for those points is only $161
I think this is a good example of why point markets can become interesting when the underlying yield is doing most of the heavy lifting
keep watching @onrefinance closely as one of the more interesting DeFi point opportunities this year
Start your Onre journey here:
app.onre.finance/earn/leaderโฆ
Also create YT-ONyc position here:
app.exponent.finance/en/markโฆ
the bigger story behind @jumperapp isnโt really the token
itโs the consumer layer Jumper is trying to build around it
crypto still makes users jump between bridges, exchanges, chains and different financial apps
Jumperโs bet is that this experience can eventually collapse into one interface
and now $JUMP gives that ecosystem its own value-accrual layer
if Jumper can keep expanding the amount of onchain activity users can do without leaving the app, the super-app thesis gets stronger
bridging was the entry point
the destination is much bigger
Make the JUMP
starting my @primus_labs journey today
their campaign just went live on @KaitoAI and Season 1 runs for 30 days
you can publish up to 10 tweets, but only your best 4 will count
0.3% of the total supply is allocated to rewards:
40% โ top 150 English creators
40% โ Chinese creators
20% โ Korean creators
time to see what Primus is building and put some real thoughts on the timeline
join early here:
s.kaito.ai/imYMgiu
The latest @axisrobotics work looks less like traditional robot learning and more like an attempt to build a software stack for physical skills
the foundation is an expanding Axis Library rather than a giant undifferentiated dataset
individual capabilities can be reused, composed into longer-horizon behaviors and distilled into lighter policies
their recent experiments give some useful signals
expert models reach near 100% success for roughly $5โ10 of compute per task, while chained capabilities can handle more complex behaviors
a proxy model then evaluates trajectories based on utility instead of treating every sample equally
that filtering step matters because a smaller, higher-quality subset can outperform the complete data pool
then there's embodied RSI, where the deployed policy itself produces real-world data that becomes training material for a stronger successor
the reported improvement from 22% to 52% shows what that feedback loop can look like
the benchmarking layer is just as important
Open Axis Benchmarking with openroboto continuously refreshes the task distribution using the growing Axis Library
so models can't simply optimize against one frozen benchmark
they have to keep generalizing as the library evolves
that's a pretty different architecture for robotics
collect skills โ compose them โ deploy โ learn from failures โ benchmark again
it's much closer to continuous integration for physical intelligence than simply collecting more trajectories
Join here:
s.kaito.ai/69icJQQ