Jumper tokenholders realising that $JUMP will be different. there's no jumper equity. all the value accrues directly to the token.

double-dipping in the crypto space where all the value accrues to the equity needs to stop. solana:Aybt5BWuW6kMNt7Jk1UmSgLzpEKev5pEnh82TA5rpump token being the only vessel for value accrual as there's no jumper equity is a first.

join the waitlist: waitlist.jumper.xyz/r/JMP-7E…

join the waitlist: waitlist.jumper.xyz/r/JMP-7E…

RT @EthDerrick: no separate equity layer, just $JUMP at the center of value accrual.

Quick alpha guys!! If $10 per post isn’t too small for you then hop on this ambassador program by Ultra wallet. Start here t.me/UltrawalletTrade_Bot/ap…

the next phase goes through $JUMP, no jumper equity here

gMorning/gBeldex guys. One thing I keep noticing in Web3 is that we talk about digital ownership, but many online identities are still controlled by centralized platforms. That’s why the BNS Marketplace caught my attention. Built on the @BeldexCoin blockchain, it allows users to own, manage, and trade BNS names directly through a peer-to-peer marketplace using BDX. My insight is simple: a digital identity should not depend entirely on a company’s rules, database, or permission. With BNS, the name is owned on-chain, while users keep more control over how it is managed and traded. The marketplace also brings: 🔹 Direct buyer-to-seller transactions 🔹 Less reliance on intermediaries 🔹 More privacy with limited personal data requirements 🔹 Greater control over listings and ownership 🔹A more open way to trade digital identities To me, BNS is more than a naming system. It’s an attempt to make online identity something users can actually own.

RT @0xulfr: word is; there's no jumper equity. $JUMP token is the only way users, contributors, and investors participate in Jumper’s grow…

RT @0xulfr: as far as apologies go, this is pretty profound. really good idea to keep the value created by Jumper aligned with tokenholde…

done listening to people search for equity shares when $JUMP is right there

from trading cashcat on the screen to buying a cartier cat ring in real life. sometimes the best part of a good trade is turning a little bit of the profit into something you’ll actually remember.

life since i was able to.. Trade. Swap. Play. Pay. Earn, and still get a shot at $1M+ in prizes on @megapot

just realised @jumperapp has no equity structure. all value accrues through $JUMP. absolutely sensational

"tomorrow" 🤞

a few hours after the listing and cashcat has already gone from 160m back down to 100m. insider wallets getting liquidated, everyone watching the chart, and somehow the conviction is still there. just another normal day in crypto.

Good Morning X! i opened @Americanfort_io before bed last night and somehow ended up thinking about crypto addresses instead of sleeping. kept thinking about the last time i dropped a receive address in a group chat, then opened the explorer and realized how much of my activity that one address exposed. that’s why i keep circling back to Send-to-Name™. the part i find interesting is the split: i can keep using the same @name when someone wants to pay me. the payment itself can use a fresh one time address. the recipient still knows who paid them. but an outside observer doesn’t get one permanent address to follow just because they know my name. and there’s no mixer or shared pool involved in that addressing model. i originally looked at the name as simple convenience. now i’m wondering if the convenience is actually the privacy feature. less copying. less address reuse. less chance of turning one public string into a history of my payments. one important caveat while i’m testing the idea: the wallet is still in beta, these names aren’t for real sends yet, and SafeSend™ is still in development. so for now, i’m looking at the addressing layer and taking notes rather than pretending the whole system is live.