You probably know me as the Base guy yet you might have seen me recently switch to Robinhood and be bullish about it. Frankly, they have been mogging Base and doing lots of things the right way. With everything going up, I was wondering how come there is yet no GROK deploy on what to me is currently the best chain yet. Once I found out a wirebot a few days ago, I was intrigued and I realized noone has done it yet. So today, Prometheus was born! The lore is great: Robinhood was almost named Prometheus, and tbh GROK was the one who suggested me in dms that lore. I told him to give me a memecoin that it would launch on Robinhood's crypto chain and it gave me a tweet from Robinhood years ago. On top of that, SPCX pairing creates history in many different ways and creates a direct connection to Elon Musk. In terms of the FUD regarding supply, I do hold some supply. Exploring an option of locking some, airdropping via wire technology or something else. Will keep you all posted. Waiting for wire dev to reply. Grok has stonks. Grok is the first AI that owns $SPCX and just stonks in general. It's been a while since I've bullposted and gone hard on one ticker and I believe this has insane LORE (Prometheus) + Provenance & AI (GROK) + Novelty (GROK owning stocks, specifically $SPCX) CA: 0x20f24b8d2bcad7cd252fc60ee5f2db27c2f2f261

a few simulated APY rates (with weekly restaking) out the gate: > 16% supply staked, 42.5% APY > 20% supply staked, 32.8% APY > 25% supply staked, 25.5% APY looking at about $50,000 in rewards per week to start.

g robinhood:0x20f24b8d2bcad7cd252fc60ee5f2db27c2f2f261 The torch is about to get HELLA lit🔥

The number of hints being dropped for robinhood:0x20f24b8d2bcad7cd252fc60ee5f2db27c2f2f261 is wild. Launched by @Grok on @RobinhoodCrypto. It couldn't get any better. Flight 14 and the statue unveil are sooner than you realize!

We've seen the community's questions about whether Aria delivers the models it advertises. Here's our direct response. Aria offers these routes as GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5, not as substitutes for older models. We are responsible for verifying that those labels accurately reflect what users receive. We tested all 21 available Aria routes for these models alongside OpenRouter references pinned to OpenAI and Anthropic. We then expanded the comparison with objective tasks at Low and High reasoning. The objective suite covered mathematics, Python code semantics, shortest-path reasoning, structured data processing, long-context retrieval and optimization. With the same 12 tasks and matched output limits: • OpenRouter's OpenAI-pinned Astra: 12/12 at Low, 12/12 at High. • Aria 0.44x: 12/12 at Low, 12/12 at High. • Aria 0.22x: 12/12 at Low, 12/12 at High. • Aria's cheapest tested route: 12/12 at Low, with all 11 completed High answers correct and one request incomplete. Some requests required retries. These are completed-answer scores, not a claim of identical reliability across routes. For the 0.22x route, those completed answers cost: • Low: $0.07164 on Aria vs $0.24763 on OpenRouter. • High: $0.09796 on Aria vs $0.31348 on OpenRouter. The same task scores, at approximately 69–71% lower cost. We also found differences on some cheaper routes, including at Low reasoning. We're investigating the routing and reasoning configuration behind those differences. We haven't established the cause, and we won't describe High as a universal fix: both 0.22x and 0.44x already scored full marks at Low. On the specific cutoff allegation: with OpenRouter pinned to OpenAI and reasoning set to High, Astra answered "June 2024" in two of three responses. The third gave no precise date. That disputed answer isn't unique to Aria and cannot, by itself, prove model substitution. Matching task scores don't independently certify model identity either. Our investigation needs to address both performance and the routing evidence behind the model labels. The report includes exact prompts, settings, answers, scoring methods and 90 OpenRouter generation receipts: entelic.io/reports/model-com… TL;DR: Aria's 0.22x route matched the official-provider reference score on our tests for about 70% less. The "old date = fake model" claim isn't proof. The results are public, and we're checking the remaining route differences. You deserve the model you pay for. You deserve the model you selected. We stand behind that standard, and any route we cannot verify should not carry that label.

all roads lead to pls bro

A quick update on Aria, what's coming next, and where I owe you better communication. I'm Aria's solo founder and sole developer. Product development, support DMs, events, and conversations with other projects currently all come through me. Replies have been slower than they should be. That explains the bottleneck, but it doesn't make it a good experience for you. Before September 30, we plan to launch GPU rentals and open our Discord community. We're targeting the major GPU options at prices substantially below typical market rates. The community will give users somewhere to ask questions, share what they're building, and help each other without everything depending on my inbox. Frame has also turned out to be more complex than we initially expected. frame.entelic.io is a work in progress, not a launched product. I'm sharing it so you can see what we're working on, not presenting it as ready. We're also coordinating a time to join @MCGlive. On API pricing: I understand why unusually low prices raise questions. Our regular API pricing isn't subsidized, but supplier agreements contain commercial details I can't publish. I don't expect that statement alone to settle everyone's concerns. I'd welcome independent testing, especially real production workloads. We're preparing a testing offer that returns 33% of eligible API spend. Testing can establish what the service delivers, how reliably it works, and what you actually pay. It won't disclose our private contracts, and I won't pretend otherwise. Thank you to everyone using Aria, reporting issues, and asking difficult but fair questions. The next step is better delivery, clearer communication, and more evidence you can evaluate for yourselves.

Blackrock calls compute a new investable resource. it never names a single inference token. So i checked 161 of them on chain. Every part of the engine already runs there. Nobody has stacked them. Where crypto and web2 collide next.

opportunity cost is insane in the space

it's not alpha until it's alpha

need to touch grass more

Robinhood watchlist update Removed some Added $STELX

#BNB / BSC watchlist update Added $ABTC

we're at that part of the cycle where they are just building the same things from last cycle and claiming they are going to billions.

base:0x22af33fe49fd1fa80c7149773dde5890d3c76f3b

how am i top 7% on bb when I haven't even realized my runners😭 y'all are getting cooked fr

Just a friendly reminder @PrometheusGrok has more catalysts than almost any token onchain: • @elonmusk statue going up soon, good chance he swaps his pfp to robinhood:0x20f24b8d2bcad7cd252fc60ee5f2db27c2f2f261 • Grok deployed its own token on RH • First time Grok has ever owned stocks $SPCX • Prometheus was robinhood's OG name before they could get RH, so a @vladtenev interaction is on the table

I’ve been watching the on-chain transactions over the last hour, and something caught my attention: wallets are buying and selling Grok-related tokens like they’re trying to catch something early. ~ Well, here’s one project I’ve been watching in this narrative: @PrometheusGrok / $PROMETHEUS. ~ It mixes the Grok narrative with SpaceX / $SPCX, which could get interesting if this flow keeps growing. Still small, still in the trenches exactly where I like to look before most people notice. ~ CA: 0x20f24b8d2bcad7cd252fc60ee5f2db27c2f2f261 ~ DYOR / NFA. @MEADGod @ponsdotfamily @elonmusk @696_eth

Starbase, Texas.

Someone asked me how to get started finding gems onchain on gg: 1. Start by checking out the top calls on the @ggdotxyz feed, it'll give you an idea of what's hot right now 2. Buy or add everything you like to a gg watchlist and do more research or ask other gg traders in the telegram community chat 3. Go through the gg leaderboard and follow all the top traders based on realized pnl and call performance 4. If you're using an AI agent for running DD, connect multiple useful data sources like gg, defilama etc for better results 5. Lastly head over to the token discovery page and filter through the top gainers page. You can further filter it down by chain and market cap. Once you get the workflow down you'll slowly develop the skill and intuition to spot gems before anyone else. We have an army of gem hunters you can learn from and 50% of our traders on @ggdotxyz are in realised profit This is part of a longer 20+ page guide I'm working on, traders on gg get early access