Sometime(s) author, editor, technologist, cyclist, etc. Usual disclaimers apply.

UK
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Nog een vraag die je nooit in de klimaatkerk hoort -en dus ook niet in de media. —> Sinds ongeveer 1980 meten wetenschappers in Wenen dat er gemiddeld zo’n 23 W/m² méér zonnestraling het aardoppervlak bereikt dan vroeger. Niet omdat de zon plots feller schijnt. Maar omdat de lucht -gelukkig- veel properder is geworden en dus minder zonlicht tegenhoudt… Dat noemen ze ‘global brightening’-prachtige naam trouwens. Maar los vd naam: als er vandaag meer energie van de zon het aardoppervlak bereikt, is het logisch om te onderzoeken welke rol dat speelt in de opwarming. En ja, die vraag kan je perfect combineren met een CO2-fetish. 🤓 Deze ontdekking onderlijnt nogmaals dat het klimaatsysteem veel complexer is dan “meer CO2 = alle opwarming”. En dan hebben we het hier nog maar over 1 bijkomend fenomeen- en invalshoek. Echte wetenschappers onderzoeken alle relevante factoren en blijven die onderzoeken. Zeker als iets zo ongelooflijk complex is als ‘het klimaat’. —> Maar een ideoloog ziet maar één oorzaak. Dogmatisch. Denken-beperkend. “Het moet en zal CO2 zijn, wat anderen ook zeggen!” Opvallend toch dat CO2 van alle mogelijke oorzaken ook juist de enige is waarop je belastingen kunt heffen… tenminste als je ervan uitgaat dat de mens de bepalende oorzaak is. Schonere lucht belasten wordt iets moeilijker -maar niet onmogelijk natuurlijk. 🤡🙈 Zoals Abraham Maslow ooit zei: “If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”
103
380
1,105
38,758
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
The idea bricks only “last 60 years” must be a huge surprise to the late King Ur Nammu who commissioned a ziggurat made of bricks in 2100bc.👇 It is still standing and still has original bricks. Perhaps we should carbon offset bricks over not a 60 year period but a 4000 year one. Reckon that makes them about as sustainable (and recyclable) as you get. (Or just scrap the net zero nonsense with its utterly perverse incentives and outcomes 🤷🏻‍♀️)
Why are buildings far uglier today than in times past? Part of the reason is that regulations punish builders who use materials deemed to be high carbon. What materials does the government deem to be high carbon? Bricks. Yes, bricks. Mad regulations suggest bricks wear out and have to be replaced after just 60 years, which will come as a surprise to anyone, like me, who lives in a victorian house. In fact, @createstreets has estimated that nearly half the country's homes are made out of bricks that are more than 60 years old. These regulations have undoubtedly played a part in helping to shut down our brick factories. Production has collapsed from two billion bricks in 2022 to 1.3 billion bricks in 2024. We've accidentally created a de facto ban on one of the most sustainable building materials we have. Thick as a brick.
20
90
370
8,618
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Some works of moral/political/legal philosophy published in the 1980s: 1980: John Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights 1981: Robert Nozick, Philosophical Explanations 1981: Bernard Williams, Moral Luck 1981: Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue 1982: HLA Hart, Essays on Bentham 1982: Amartya Sen, Poverty and Famines 1983: Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice 1984: Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons 1985: Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy 1986: Martha Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness 1986: Joseph Raz, The Morality of Freedom 1986: Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire 1986: James Griffin, Well-Being 1987: David Wiggins, Needs, Values, Truth 1989: Onora O'Neill, Constructions of Reason It's fair to call this a golden age. And there was no Research Excellence Framework then either
11
41
203
14,597
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
"The great thing about Brexit is that it ripped away all the insulation between the dreams of the people and the decision-making of the elites. It dragged law-making back home by the scruff of its neck. It robbed our rulers of a hiding place, of that old snivelling excuse: ‘We have to do this, it’s what the EU wants.’"
Never forget how the elites responded to Brexit. They called us racists, fascists, pig meat (gammon). They did everything in their power to overthrow our votes. It was one of the most sickening assaults on democracy in our history, says Brendan O’Neill buff.ly/zUxWuGV
14
131
597
22,160
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Labour can: - Call Tories 'scum'. - Call Brexiteers 'worse than Nazis'. - Say Farage flirted with the Hitler Youth. - Compare Truss to a lettuce. But the Tories are apparently 'classless' for pointing out Bridget Phillipson is a terrible Education Secretary? 🤔 #TwoTierLabour
91
1,213
6,012
85,468
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Phillipson's claim that imposing VAT on private schools wasn't 'spiteful' would be more credible if she hadn't abolished the Latin Excellence Programme, canned the IB and slashed advanced maths in state schools. A small-minded ideology obsessed with cutting down tall poppies.
40
546
3,552
54,273
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
They're absolutely obsessed with diminishing Britain in any way they possibly can.
Lord Hermer resurrects Chagos Islands 'surrender' deal and tells MPs the Government is 'determined' to see it signed trib.al/zGTFt2O
11
57
665
15,898
This list of policy disasters has the makings of an important book. The three additional catastrophes I’d add are: First, the over expansion of universities. Using young people as debt mules and creating a sunken £400bn loan book by the 2030s is financial idiocy. It has also mismatched the aspirations of entire cohorts of British people with both their capabilities and actual economic opportunities. Thousands on benefits should be actually be doing the low skilled work presently done by third world migrants. Multitudes of degree holders should be working in trades. Secondly, reckless mass immigration. Importing millions of culturally dissimilar and unassimilable people is a huge social and economic time bomb. The evidence suggests groups that start ‘fiscally negative’ remain so. The rest of society will pay the price in perpetuity. Present open border and mass immigration policy is exacerbating the problem. Stop. Third, foreign ownership of British assets and vassalage to the USA. American tech, media and retail corporations have penetrated Britain to such an extent that a large proportion of the typical UK household budget is transferred directly out as monthly ‘rental’ payments. The inability of British governments to tax the profits of these multinationals properly illustrates our weakness. Years of indifference to who owns what has resulted in a secular deterioration in the UK’s annual primary income and NIIP. Can we correct it? Well, not under our establishment political class which prefers pretence to reality. If we are to gradually fix these problems considerable sacrifices will be necessary and we should start by recognising this.
Oh for fuck’s sake give it a rest… Brexit was FACTUALLY a de minimis footnote (I voted remain in 2016 so don’t even start…) when compared with a raft of the worst policy decisions imaginable since the end of WW2 across virtually all policy areas, by fuckwit politicians… To name some of the biggest offenders: - Most expensive energy in the developed world fuelling inflation across every good and service going - and net zero cultish insanity crippling our economy; we now make virgin steel only via emergency nationalisation in all but name - mainly because windmills and solar don’t produce the joules to produce concrete or steel, to build stuff - Shuttering North Sea oil whilst buying the same stuff from the Norwegians who banked the oil: two trillion in the tank, three hundred grand a head, a quarter of the budget paid forever - PFI. Blair and Brown fancied hospitals that didn’t trouble the books, so they put them on tick with loan sharks. £60b of buildings, £300b out the door, NHS still paying through the nose for a car park and a leaky roof. - Tories borrowed the best part of £400bn at 0%, the cheapest money in three hundred years, and what have we got for it? Furlough, a fortune in PPE that didn’t work, and ~£20b handed to chancers with fake ltd co’s. Nothing built. Nothing that pays you back. The lot, gone. And here’s the one nobody says out loud… Money was free. Risk free. Rates at zero for the best part of a fucking decade. If a govt or their perm secs had any sense that was the moment to issue a 30y infra bond and build the grid, the reactors, the track, the housing, lock the cost in at basically nothing and let it pay for itself for two generations. Norway would’ve had it done by lunch. We didn’t issue a penny of it. Now the long end’s at 5.5 and the door’s now bolted shut. We had the cheapest money in history and spaffed it all. - Capital markets that don’t work since Blair and Brown’s various legislative and regulatory changes, making pension fund allocations lower going into British companies, and making it harder and more costly to raise capital to grow and keep businesses here paying taxes and employing people - the collective cost of this to British households is conservatively estimated to be around £20trillion (per @andyroocraig’s figures) and countries that were literally communist within living memory are on track to overtake us this decade, on the IMF’s own numbers. Oh, and Mississippi HAS already overtaken us on GDP per capita basis (they are the butt of all poverty jokes in the US) - Brown flogged 395 tonnes of gold, over half the national reserve, in 17 auctions between 1999 and 2002, at about $275 an ounce, near a twenty-year structural low. They call it “Brown’s Bottom” for a reason. Pocketed $3.5b but I t’d be worth around $52b today. So that socialist genius cleared the lot at the bottom of the market and torched the thick end of £40b in one decision (because he like many politicians since the 90s is a retard with no real world understanding) - P90/P10 wage compression under social democracy is demonstrably worse than even the Soviets managed under Gosplan ffs - Selling off and sweating various other national assets to fund our absurd debt borrowing pile that has mostly been spaffed up the wall on zero return or loss making initiatives / welfare socialism etc - Series of the worst trade deals imaginable (pre and post Brexit) - Too much of people’s money tied up in the resi property Ponzi scheme doing nothing (other than now: losing value in realtime) - Planning laws that stop anyone building infrastructure on housing I could go on… Plus we have rising long yields now, which are (TL;DR) the price of having destroyed your own structural buyer base and then issuing into the gap while the central bank sells on top. Brexit doesn’t appear anywhere in that mechanism either. So, this creepy obsession you have with Brexit is weird, lame and entirely worn out. Bin. 🚮
17
137
660
31,905
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
We just forced a vote in Parliament to stop the Puberty Blocker trial. The Government voted it down. These children are perfectly healthy. They need our care and support - not to be experimented on with life-changing drugs. Expertly argued by my colleague @drcarolinej
391
2,738
11,141
248,537
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
I still laugh from time to time about a seminar I attended at Cambridge where anthropologists and moral philosophers were talking about morality in cross-cultural perspective and the subject of private property came up. After various know-it-alls suggested there was no deep basis for private property ("cultural construction"), an ethologist piped up, "Have you ever tried to take a banana from a gorilla?" and there was just dead silence for about a minute and then everyone pretended nothing had happened and just continued as they had been.
The concept of private land is actually insane if you consider it for even a moment
153
1,270
14,483
512,338
"In 627, the heat was so great in France and Germany, says the London Standard, that all springs dried up; water became so scarce that many people died of thirst." "In 1753 the thermometer rose to one hundred and eighteen degrees" google.com/books/edition/Gai…
14
214
539
15,908
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Poland’s “all-time” high temperature record of 40.2°C (104.4°F) was set on July 29, 1921. How did that happen when CO₂ levels were under 304 ppm? What we are seeing here is just weather, just like it was 105 years ago.
Temperatura powyżej 40 stopni w Polsce zdarzyła się tylko 3 krotnie od kiedy oficjalnie zaczęto mierzyć ją w 1779 roku. Niektóre modele przewidują temperaturę ponad 40 - aż trzy dni z rzędu - od niedzieli do wtorku. 247 lat pomiarów i zaledwie 3 pojedyncze dni teraz zrobimy w zaledwie... 3 dni. W dodatku w czerwcu - kiedy to rekordowe były zawsze lipiec i sierpień. A i tak znajdzie się debil z wypranym łbem, który powie, że to normalne.
129
996
3,964
70,467
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
'Dusk in Browning Street.' (c1954) Edward Seago painted many views of London throughout his career. His streetscapes from the 1950s are some of his most accomplished, showing to best effect his mastery of light and reflection.
3
57
306
6,279
So let me get this straight... When climate reconstructions show a Medieval Warm Period, we're told it was only regional and doesn't challenge the climate crisis narrative. But when Europe has a heatwave, suddenly a few hot weeks in one region are proof of a global climate emergency. Interesting how "regional doesn't matter" only seems to apply when it's inconvenient.
You should have seen the European heat waves in the Medieval Warm Peroid... at preindustrial levels of CO2.
76
496
2,309
49,038
France is in a heatwave. Meanwhile, almost nobody wants to talk about the fact that Europe has added hundreds of thousands of square kilometers of heat-absorbing concrete, asphalt, roads, parking lots, and buildings since 1950. We're told every hot day is proof of a CO₂-driven climate crisis. But replacing natural landscapes with giant heat-retaining surfaces couldn't possibly matter? That's not science... That's propaganda.
99
654
1,803
40,992
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Europe seems to be the only place that is getting these intense [and admittedly unusual] heatwaves on the regular. If CO₂ were the cause, we’d see this pattern everywhere. We aren’t. So, this is mostly an artifact of natural variability. To get a heatwave requires high-pressure ridging; emissions don’t cause them.
It's going to be forty fucking three degrees in my town in the fucking 𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 of France on Tuesday ! and if you don't believe we've fucked up the climate, you're a fucking idiot ! Excuse my French 🤡
222
332
1,954
89,523
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Always good to put asbestos in a product and then fan it into the surrounding area.
GO GREEN, GET ASBESTOS Asbestos from China discovered in 1,000 UK wind turbines Massive cover up as industry known for many months; scandalous Secretly replacing components, hoping would go undiscovered thetimes.com/article/573e5f7…
39
675
2,418
28,288
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
No child is born able to read. The brain ships with no reading region at all. It builds one, and the construction runs on the exact effort AI removes. Learning to read physically repurposes a patch of visual cortex. A spot in the left fusiform gyrus starts out tuned to objects and faces. Through months of effortful decoding, a 6-year-old converts it into the visual word form area, the region every literate adult uses to recognize words on sight. Stanislas Dehaene mapped it and called it neuronal recycling. Pre-literate kids show no special response to letters there. It shows up only as they struggle to read. The struggle is the build signal. When a child strains to sound out a word or hold a sum in working memory, focus chemicals like acetylcholine and norepinephrine flag that circuit as worth keeping. Effort is how the nervous system marks which synapses to strengthen. Low effort, no marker. Errors carry the same signal. The brain learns from the gap between what it predicted and what turned out true. Each wrong guess followed by a correction releases the dopamine that drives the rewire. Fluent, instant output produces almost none of it. The wiring locks in later, during deep sleep, when the circuits tagged that day get consolidated. Only the ones that fired hard enough to get tagged. A child who never strained tagged nothing to keep. Hand that child a model that returns the sentence or the answer on demand, and the strain, the errors, and the prediction gap vanish at once. The worksheet looks finished. The cortex that should have rewired underneath it never fired. The window is the urgent part. The tissue reading recycles is where childhood plasticity peaks, and ages 6 to 13 are when that repurposing is cheapest. Miss the reps then and the same wiring costs far more to build later, if it builds at all. Norway is the country that already ran the opposite experiment. In 2016 they gave a tablet to every 5-year-old, went all in on screens in class, and watched the results for a decade. Now they're pulling AI out for ages 6 to 13 and funding paper books again. A government reading its own data ahead of the curve. The biology is identical in every country. Norway just moved on it first. Watch how fast others follow.
Norway bans AI access in schools for kids ages 6-13, while also restricting AI for kids 14-16 to prevent academic decline
39
729
2,045
185,215
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
David Lammy has been told to ditch his dangerous plans to curb our right to jury trials and focus instead on filling empty courtrooms, with nearly 800 sitting days lost in April alone. Ministry of Justice data shows courtrooms sat empty for a total of 778 days in April. Across England and Wales, there are 532 Crown Court courtrooms — yet many are left unused on working days. In response to a parliamentary question from Shadow Justice Secretary @NJTimothy, Justice Minister Sarah Sackman revealed that between 41 and 86 courtrooms stood empty on each day of April. Nick Timothy said: “While David Lammy plans to restrict our ancient right to trial by jury, courts across the country are sitting empty for days at a time. “The Justice Committee was clear that there is little evidence restricting jury trials will save any court time. “Labour should drop its dangerous plans to end jury trials and ensure courts are operating at full capacity to clear the backlog.” Open the courts. Save jury trials.
48
1,084
2,985
24,965
Pavlov's Cat retweeted
Education has a serious habit of falling in love with beautiful theories and completely forgetting to check if they actually work. A brutal example was just published in the journal Review of Education by Clarence Green and Iain Giblin. They audited the "Pedagogy of Multiliteracies" a framework that has shaped international curricula and teacher training for 30 years. Introduced in 1996, Multiliteracies argues that traditional print is outdated and that schools should focus on "multimodal" communication (videos, audio, digital layout) and social diversity. The researchers screened 20,581 studies published over the last three decades. They looked for a basic scientific standard: any classroom intervention that measured actual K-12 literacy outcomes against a control group. They found ZERO. It is an entirely "empty review." We have spent a generation reshaping schools around an intervention that has never been empirically proven to improve literacy. Even worse, the framework's founders explicitly attacked explicit phonics instruction, calling it "authoritarian", a stance that flies directly in the face of modern cognitive science and reading data. Good intentions do not equal effective instruction. If a theory cannot survive a basic controlled trial, it belongs in a seminar room, not a classroom. I’ve broken down why our field is so uniquely prone to hiding behind noble ideas instead of demanding hard proof. open.substack.com/pub/ammara…
17
77
202
36,034