These sort of unwritten arbitrary-yet-sacrosanct rules help identify outsiders and preserve cultural identity. Culture only lasts if it has walls.
“My late brother Francis, staying with a French family to improve his knowledge of the language, was helping himself to cheese at dinner. The plateau included a wedge of brie, and the inexperienced Englishman, instead of slicing along the side, cut off the point, or nose. His hostess, exercising that special French skill in making foreign visitors feel at ease, remarked: ‘Je n’ai jamais vu personne qui découpât comme ça le nez d’un brie.’ Francis said that he distinctly heard, in the air above the family dining-table, the sharp hiss of the circumflex over the third person singular of the past subjunctive.” — John Sturrock, London Review of Books 1996
31
In the real world whether you're a Catholic, Protestant, Jew, etc, there are only two options at the top of the ballot and you're picking one of them. Being Catholic doesn't put you beyond politics, and you sound like pretentious (and dishonest) when you pretend it does.
I'm not a Republican or a Democrat, I'm just Catholic. You've never debated anyone like me.
1
69
Stupid arguments over "rights" are all you're left with when you discard nature and ends. An ai doesn't have a rational nature, a baby does. That's the difference.
I'd like to remind everyone that if babies have rights then they have duties and responsibilities too.
27
It's funny how even in this psychotic resistlib fantasy scenario step one is "America crushes Canadian forces instantly."
Theo Moudakis’s latest cartoon imagines what a U.S. invasion of Canada would look like.
2
45
Aquinas distinguishes three mental states we often conflate: Knowledge, when something follows clearly from something certain, and once grasped isn't a matter of choice. Opinion, something arbitrarily chosen. Belief falls in between, it's neither arbitrary, nor held by necessity.
"Can you change your beliefs?" is one of my favorite questions to think about. Because like, not really. I can't decide to wake up tomorrow believing something different. But why not? It's just thoughts. Path dependency? The minds of my past selves constraining present me?
1
38
So for belief, you have some reason for holding it, but there's an element of choice involved. You could deny it if you wanted.
1
14
People on both sides don't want to hear this but the issue is complicated. Disability payments have actually been shown to INCREASE rates and severity of disability. But it's not because people are lying, it's because you create a mindset of dependency.
Sean Strickland is an idiot. Always has been, always will be. It's a good thing he can fight, because he would probably be homeless if he actually had to think for a living. VA Disability is a short cut so the Government doesn't have to live in court dealing with Occupational Disability Lawsuits 24/7/365. If they want to get rid of VA Disability, as it currently stands, that's fine with us...as long as you also allow us to sue the Government for Disability Compensation like civilians get to do with their employers. If you think the Government is in debt now, imagine the lawsuits for millions in compensation every year from service members getting out. We currently cannot sue the government for disability like civilians can with their employers. The attorney fees alone would probably cost the government more than VA Disability does. The US Government is getting off super cheap with VA Disability. Focus on your next fight Sean. Damn, that boy stupid.
31
"Let death and exile and every other thing which appears dreadful be daily before your eyes; but most of all death: and you will never think of anything mean nor will you desire anything extravagantly."
Tucker Carlson recounts a private meeting where Donald Trump dismissed serious concerns over a potential war with Iran by casually telling him, "In the end, we're all dead anyway." "I said to him, shocked, 'But what about our kids, our grandkids, our country?'
Made with AI
31
No matter how much they deny it, the atheist's values will eventually reduce to nothing more than maximizing physical pleasure and minimizing physical pain.
I know that among my followers, MAID is reviled. But I'm actually a supporter of it. Having recently had a relative die horrifically, with pain that MAID could have alleviated, my support is stronger than ever. First, just look at the reasons people do MAID:
1
28
Wow can't wait for the day we can finally buy sourdough in America.
the hell going on in USA
1
2
27
Wow can't wait for the day we can buy steak fries in America.
Replying to @ayeejuju
no wonder our cancer rates the highest in the world
Community note
The US does not have the world's highest cancer rate. Per GLOBOCAN 2022 (IARC/WCRF) age-standardized incidence data, Australia ranks highest at ~462/100,000, followed by New Zealand and Denmark; the US ranks around 4th-5th at ~367/100,000. worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankin… wcrf.org/preventing-can…
1
1
10
This is the response you always get when you point out that things have ends. But notice that the very language of "perception" answers the question. Different agents have different perceptions; that's not a contradiction, that's how perception works!
Replying to @AdAltum @xwanyex
What’s “bad” for the rat is “good” for the cat. Which perception of reality is the correct one? The rat or the cat?
1
1
40
A rat sees the world from an inch off the ground, the cat from 10 inches, which perception is correct? They both are! There's no contradiction there!
8
This highlights something important, which is the fallacy being used to attack such people is of the form "If you can't articulate it, it isn't real." We live in an age where descriptions are treated as more real than the realities they're meant to describe.
"‘Who are we?’ is a question that the English never needed to ask themselves because they instinctively knew who they were. England was simply ‘home’." — Sir Roger Scruton, England: an elegy
2
32
Wayne keeps pushing this position that ends (as opposed to means) are totally arbitrary and undecidable (which is why he calls them "preferences"). But that's obviously false! We can absolutely compare ends, Aristotle begins his work on ethics by doing exactly that!
If ethical philosophers were honest they’d name the field, “Preferences.” Oh, wow, you can give *reasons* for your preferences in this specific domain? Wow, you’re so right — that’s completely different from all other kinds of preferences.
2
24
It's really easy to say that happiness is a better candidate for the end of human beings than getting cancer! That's not "just a preference," and it's crazy to say it is! Wayne is going against common sense here, despite his "I'm just stating the obvious" schtick.
13
You'll know things are better when these doctors start going to prison.
35
Effective Altruism is terrible but the criticisms are full of positions that are just as wrong. "Happiness doesn't even matter," "One human life is worth sacrificing every animal on earth," "There's no such thing as right and wrong," these are all also terrible positions.
41
Effective Altruism is terrible but the criticisms are full of positions that are just as wrong. "Happiness doesn't even matter," "One human life is worth sacrificing every animal on earth," "There's no such thing as right and wrong," these are all also terrible positions.
63