Now I architect bare-metal AI systems. But TaskForceAI’s multi-model adversarial debates were born from the architecture I use to Red Team all AI output.
The prefrontal cortex trained in the Trivium of Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric--Harnessing human thinking engines, reliably optimizing their output for Millenia--yes, it works for mechanical thinking engines, too. I built the proof. Receipts available.
Since Elon Musk employs 160,000 people directly, and Elon Musk indirectly employs an estimated 350,000 to 784,000 people through his business ecosystem, a SMART society would try to create MORE Elons.
300 to 400 Elons WOULD EMPLOY THE ENTIRE U.S. WORKFORCE.
Despite having hundreds of mosques in New York, mass street “prayers” are becoming a staple of life in the Big Apple.
And it’s not prayers, my friends, but assertion. They are claiming turf, like hyenas pissing to mark territory.
Despite having hundreds of mosques in New York, mass street “prayers” are becoming a staple of life in the Big Apple.
And it’s not prayers, my friends, but assertion. They are claiming turf, like hyenas pissing to mark territory.
It is an absolute joke that so-called "AI gurus" still tell people to start prompts with "Act as an expert fill-in-the-blank." Because of how these models are trained via RLHF, assigning a persona doesn't give you an expert's actual skillset—it just triggers a semantic output filter. The AI puts on a costume, mimicking the vocabulary and "airs" of a professional without adopting their functional worldview or methodology. Stop asking the machine to play pretend. If you want expert results, dictate the exact rules, constraints, and professional frameworks it must apply. Demand a calculation, not a cosplay.
Why is it axiomatic that your vote only counts if the winner shares your skin color?
If I am a white man in a 90% black city, how am I NOT racist to claim the winner has to be white?
How am I disenfranchised if I get to vote for the candidate whose character I prefer?
.@GadSaad agrees with Orwell: it takes an intellectual to come up with truly stupid ideas. When academics are disconnected from reality or accountability, bad ideas spread like parasites. While STEM professionals have to answer for their mistakes, humanities professors build theories that no one ever has to test. That lack of accountability is exactly how toxic ideas take over a university and eventually a culture. If these professors can't survive the scrutiny of their own ideas, should they be teaching our children? Watch here 👉l.prageru.com/49RBlY7
To solve any problem, ask first, Has anyone ever solved... followed by an accurate description of the problem. If anyone has ever solved it, your question is answered. If no one has solved it, ask, what has prevented humanity from solving this problem? Remove that obstacle by going through, around, over or under it--or deleting it.
The left: Stop saying we are pushing for illegal immigrants to vote in elections
Also the left: All we’re saying is we want illegal immigrants to vote in elections