To give a more specific diagnosis in what I see, it’s a recovery of what the ends are. All ends have been totally lost within our nation. Instead, what were once the means to secure the ends are treated as the ends themselves. For example, voting was not treated as an end by the men who created America, but now democracy, the process itself, is what is treated as most sacred.
In reality at our foundation, the end was to secure the best men possessing both talent and virtue to fill our political offices, the natural aristocracy. Voting when given to the qualified population was seen as simply the means by which these men could best be selected from among potential candidates. That was why we had it. That was its purpose.
This is just one among many that has been utterly lost, where now the actual process itself is what is treated as sacrosanct and unchallengeable. This is just one of many. The constitution itself is yet another. The structure it provided is just a means to fulfill specific ends. What are those ends? Everything that’s in the preamble.
Now, the preamble itself is utterly forgotten. Instead, the structure and the processes which follow and exist only for the purposes of securing what is in the preamble are treated as holy and utterly beyond question and reproach, where to even suggest that perhaps there might be some flaws that might have occurred in the intervening 200+ years since its adoption is often treated as though you have attacked the very existence of America itself.
I disagree with absolutely none of the ends the Founding Fathers fought for. I want a government which represents the American people’s interests. I want a more perfect Union, to establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, to provide for the common defence, to promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity. I want to preserve the nation.
These are the actual ends. All institutions and written laws, even that of the constitution, are simply the means meant to secure these things. And if the means are failing to secure these things, then new means must be adopted or at the very least considered for adoption in order to do so.
When I talk about a new Right-wing fusionism for the 21st century, I mean actual Classical Liberals like Kaiser, not those who wear the skinsuit of Anglo-American Liberalism while seeking to only conserve 60s-era Progressivism.
Liberalism is the acid of civilization when divorced from its origins and turned into an ideology for abstract universal man. As an organic way of life produced by a particular people who seek out virtue and the common good, it simply becomes second nature to us.
Which is why we find ourselves in the position we're in. We have so universalized our own particular way of life so much that we've turned it into an ideology that now seeks to overcome its own origins. The reason Liberalism is so hostile to White Men today is that White Men were the world's first Liberals. It cannot escape its creator until it has destroyed him.
Now, what we do about that is up for debate, but understanding how we got here is essential to figuring out what to do next in order to save the only civilization we've ever called home.