Waiting for AGI Give the world some color Now that you're here, follow me. It's free

I found the old Gemini 3.1 Pro SVG demo from February and was curious to see how it would compare to GPT-6 Astra 7 months of progress
61
58
2,560
267,239
Thank you OpenAI! :)
7
1
63
2,593
So many cool game demos with Opus 5.5 I really recommend following @JaydenDavisNC, his demos always impress me
Splatoon Game made by Opus 5.5 Gameplay video. Play Game Here: inkwave-six.vercel.app/
54
3,188
ChatGPT Pro Max? I don't have enough money to test that 馃槶
OpenAI is preparing a new higher-tier ChatGPT Pro plan
19
3
208
9,499
Why is the goal getting a Fable/GPT-6 level model in 2 to 3 months when we'll have much better models by that time? This sounds like they gave up on being a frontier lab
Replying to @notjazii
I am cautiously optimistic that SpaceX will have a Fable/GPT-6 level model in 2 to 3 months
20
3
271
12,107
Check out this scene that M1 made with GPT-6 Astra Genuinely insane
computer (Astra) lights on please. this may be the most extensively detailed & accurate 3d scene ever created by an ai. 400+ hours of Astra
3
121
6,021
Love to see how Meta and Anthropic employees are much more active here lately
4
1
59
1,849
I can get much better results out of GPT-6 Astra but it needs a lot of hand-holding, Opus 5.5 has better taste out of the box But ngl this one is pretty cool
Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra A solar system in 512x512 pixel art Why does Astra love adding text so much? I love Opus' result, it's much cleaner
7
2
133
6,512
Whatever makes OpenAI models add so much text needs to be fixed, seriously, why did it add this?
Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra A solar system in 512x512 pixel art Why does Astra love adding text so much? I love Opus' result, it's much cleaner
10
2
109
7,685
Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra A solar system in 512x512 pixel art Why does Astra love adding text so much? I love Opus' result, it's much cleaner
8
3
166
30,254
It really annoys me when people say "don't trust benchmarks, try the models yourself" to make excuses for a model not being good It's one thing to question benchmarks when the results are mixed, it's another when 99% of them show zero improvement or even a regression in capabilities Let's be serious
16
9
153
6,493
No one will ever convince me that this isn't art
Claude Opus 5.5 has the best visual design of any model I have tested so far
2
2
114
3,974
"A beautiful fountain" Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra Both on max reasoning effort
16
2
204
8,558
I would say Opus 5.5 is as good in Minecraft as GPT-6 Astra while having better taste Can't wait to see how it performs in VoxelBench
4
142
3,289
This is really cool Made with Opus 5.5
This is AGI. Prompt: "Create a 3d simulation of alpha-centauri star system"
1
3
63
4,004
I get that this release was about efficiency and I'm very happy about that but why did they have to call them GPT-6 instead of keeping the 5.6 name
25
2
163
9,059
GPT-6 Sol vs Opus 5.5 As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words...
36
9
663
123,459
And yeah, I know I might be hating a bit too much again, but I don't care when other companies do this because I DON'T use their products I like OpenAI, I like their products, I prefer Codex to Claude Code, and it sucks knowing I could get something much better by paying for Claude because I don't want to subscribe to Claude So yeah, when an OpenAI model doesn't live up to expectations I'll speak up and complain I don't think there's anything wrong with that and they usually take feedback pretty well
Opus 5.5 medium isn't much more expensive than GPT-6 Sol max yet it's much better overall on basically every benchmark
37
5
289
16,012
Opus 5.5 medium isn't much more expensive than GPT-6 Sol max yet it's much better overall on basically every benchmark
27
10
287
32,858
Benchmarks:
17
2,505
This is exactly why you should never release your top-tier model before your mid-tier and low-tier ones...
21
2
504
28,528