[🌲] POTENTIAL BINANCE HACK ONGOING - ONCHAIN

Its funny how some traders made a name for themselves on FOMO, then got a big offer and moved to PUMP only. Not only did they move, but they started shitting on FOMO as well Crazy🤣

If finding “extremely bundled” plays is this easy for your convenience, why isn’t Pumpfun adding any kind of warning for bundled plays launched on the platform to protect normies? Especially when most of these are launched , bundled and shilled by the same Pump Squads. So protecting funds only becomes a priority when your own funds are at risk, not when it’s users’ funds? I was told , ‘game is game’

this has been fixed, it was a bug on our end due to you transferring the position in pre-competition note that any other transfers in post-start are not counted - only off-platform holdings held before the competition started are counted as we didn't want to see tokens get sold off and rebought during the competition.

just so we can clarify what is going on here with @Pumpfun if their affiliated KOLs (all of whom are in a single pf squad who are currently in top 3 spot in their squad competition) bundle a coin, and all sell for thousands of dollars of profit, sending the coin crashing from 400k to 30k, that is considered acceptable within your terms and conditions but when another squad, not full of your paid KOLs, make money on a coin 'bundled' on robinhood chain, you void the entire trade based on it being on EVM, before retracting this as a violation of ts and cs, pivot it to bundling being the violation, and sending them to the bottom of the leaderboard? seems like a flagrant double standard and preferential treatment for your paid employees in a trading competition.

they did not. however, the PNL score they had on their extremely bundled token was removed. they are currently rank #492.

it has become complete counter-consensus to be bullish onchain now, have never seen sentiment this bad & ive been here ~9 years crypto twitter has forgotten that it requires actual work on the builder side to make coins do well, so many traders complaining about lower ceilings on coins and not nearly enough people actually trying to build interesting protocols and/or to change that dynamic

🚨LAWSUIT CLAIMS PUMPFUN INTERNAL CHATS SHOW IT WAS BUILT TO MAXIMIZE ADDICTIVE TRADING! In an ongoing class-action lawsuit against Pump.fun and related parties, plaintiffs allege that roughly 5,000 internal team messages reveal the platform was deliberately designed to maximize addictive engagement and fee revenue. According to the complaint, leadership discussed slot-machine style mechanics and acknowledged the product was built around users continuing to trade even when most lose money. The claims come from whistleblower materials cited in the amended complaint.

“Good things take time” is the biggest lie ever told. Good things take a competent team who knows which tools you need to succeed as a trader and knows how to ship them at record speeds. When we launched Pump Bridge yesterday, I said we’re dedicated to giving you the best possible onchain trading experience, no matter what it takes. We meant that - which is why we’re proud to take another HUGE step towards giving you the MOST edge on Pumpfun with EVM limit orders. Every social trading app had the chance to ship EVM traders limit orders for all relevant chains after months of pleas for a feature that massively puts them ahead - no one can babysit a trade 24 hours a day - yet no one even tried to ship a solution. We were late to crosschain trading, yet we were the first to ship limit orders on Solana and now EVM. That’s two MAJOR product releases in just two days. And there’s much more coming. As of now, we are the fastest shipping team in crypto. Your trading app should be shipping massive upgrades to your trading experience every single week. If they aren’t, it’s on you to decide which platform is best for your career as a trader. The sooner you join Pumpfun, the sooner you unlock the chance to become one of the Greats onchain. Sent from my Pumpfun App

The MOST REWARDING referral program in crypto’s history. We’re giving away ALL of the Pumpfun App’s revenue via rewards! - Your referral deposits $50 → both of you get $50 on top - ~10% reduced fees for your referrals - Referrers get a limited-time 4x boost Learn more 👇

AI will generate hundreds of billions of dollars in philanthropic funding openai foundation is donating ~$220B and Anthropic co-founders pledged to donate 80% of their wealth so we have a HUGE amount of work to do to ensure we’re allocating this capital well

We’re honored to welcome Prof. Karl Friston, world-renowned neuroscientist and pioneer of the Free Energy Principle, as a founding advisor to Kardashev Research. Together, we’ll explore the foundations of intelligence and the thermodynamics of self-organizing complex systems.

Point-form recap of the space discussing / brainstorming @Kardashev_AI - ICYMI: -Turning e/acc into a formal institution. The organizers want to move beyond memes, posting, and informal group chats into scientific papers, philosophy, policy proposals, and sustained influence. They said the nonprofit had been under discussion for over a year. -Leadership and initial setup. Beff/Gill would serve as chairman and help with fundraising while continuing to run Extropic. Maxwell, described as having worked with neuroscientist Karl Friston, would run the institute. A domain was purchased, but incorporation, legal structure, staffing, and budgets were still being worked out. -An unexpected financial windfall accelerated the announcement. Beff described unsolicited money arriving through X Money amid crypto/meme activity, reaching roughly $100,000 by late in the conversation. He said he had not launched or owned the associated token and intended to put the proceeds toward the nonprofit. Initial spending would cover legal fees, computers, basic AI usage, and a short period of operations before larger fundraising. -Creating a counterweight to effective altruism and AI-restriction advocacy. Participants argued that AI-risk organizations have far more funding and coordination than e/acc. They anticipated further funding from AI-company wealth and potential IPOs, and wanted an institution capable of responding with research and policy arguments. Those funding forecasts were speculative. -Researching intelligence across biological and artificial systems. Proposed work included thermodynamics, information theory, neuroscience, and alternative computing—especially understanding how intelligence emerges in different physical substrates, rather than focusing exclusively on conventional digital AI. -Exploring hybrid biological–silicon intelligence. One proposed experiment was to connect cultured-neuron computing systems from Cortical Labs with Extropic’s thermodynamic computing hardware. The aim would be to demonstrate a combined biological and artificial intelligence system. This was an exploratory idea, not an announced working prototype. -Developing a deeper intellectual foundation for e/acc. They discussed complex adaptive systems, active inference, economics, and how ideas spread and influence behavior. The ambition was to develop a substantial school of thought, with advancing civilization’s energy use and technological capabilities—the Kardashev-scale framing—as a guiding objective. -Protecting access to AI and compute. A recurring policy theme was the freedom to own computing hardware, train models, use open weights, and run inference independently. Speakers proposed a “First Amendment for synthetic thought” and a “Second Amendment for compute” as advocacy concepts. -Opposing concentrated control and regulatory capture. Participants worried that a few large AI labs could use regulation to exclude competitors and restrict independent AI use. They argued that centralized control, censorship, and authoritarian outcomes deserved greater attention in AI-risk discussions. -Studying markets as a mechanism for AI alignment. Speakers suggested that customer demand, competition, reputation, and liability could encourage useful, reliable models. They criticized safety certification that, in their view, could become procedural theater or shield companies from responsibility. -Connecting autonomous AI with crypto. They speculated about AI agents earning money and paying independent hosts for compute through cryptocurrency. Related ideas included community-funded model training, shared ownership of models, and distributing model revenue to contributors. -Debating nonprofit structure and independence. The group discussed research and lobbying entities, potentially using both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) structures. A DAO was floated, but the conversation leaned toward a simpler nonprofit structure. They also emphasized avoiding dependence on one dominant donor. -Reaching people outside the tech/Twitter audience. Ana and Shaw stressed that research alone would not be enough. Suggestions included AI-assisted journalist research and outreach, accessible explanations, cultural content, events, and concrete stories about benefits such as better healthcare, more family time, and greater prosperity. -Making optimism credible and actionable. An extended discussion connected pessimistic narratives with “learned helplessness.” Participants argued for a specific, believable picture of a better future that motivates people to act, while acknowledging that broad prosperity and managing job disruption require actual solutions. -Choosing research with tangible public benefits. A participant with lobbying experience suggested focusing on problems that policymakers and ordinary people already care about, particularly healthcare. Maxwell also discussed distinguishing recoverable crises from self-reinforcing catastrophes, using demographic decline as an example. -Next steps and community participation. The organizers planned to formalize the organization, raise additional funds, publish materials explaining its direction, and invite researchers, policy specialists, communicators, and supporters to contribute. No detailed launch schedule or finalized research roadmap was presented. -Other conversation and closing banter. Side topics included Extropic’s progress, AI documentaries and podcasts, crypto-community dynamics, memories of early e/acc Spaces, San Francisco culture, and restaurant automation. The late discussion about a massive nonprofit data center was joking rather than a concrete commitment.