If you think empathy is a "toxic" trait, you're a special kind of awful.

You already declared yourself an enemy to Whites. This is why I loathe people like you. You're cowardly. I'm Comanche. When the Whites entered our hunting territory and tried to settle it, we fought them and drove them back for almost a century. We warred with them. There was no posing as a friend, or impersonating a White person and trying to undermine them from within. We fought them openly, in the way of men. Then, when the White won, we had peace, and that was the end of it. Your kind cannot do that. You lie and lie and lie and cheat and lie and one day you're angry and you declare war and then the next you mewl and cry like a woman that you're not being included in the category that you just declared emnity for. I laugh at you. I scorn you. I declare you weaker than a woman. You bring shame upon all those of your blood and your name I will not say aloud without spitting.

All Trump had to do was not go to war in Iran until after the midterms. Economy was picking up. Prices falling. Sentiment optimistic. Gas at $2 in many states. All he had to do was not go to war in Iran until after the midterms.

An interesting development for one of the last major providers of transgender medical procedures for children in California.

your wife is indian.

These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it. One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.” Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t. Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question. Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 WISCONSIN JUST GOT ABSOLUTELY SCREWED BY THE REFS. NOTRE DAME CLEARLY DID NOT RECOVER THE FOOTBALL WHILE IN BOUNDS, AND THE REFS STILL GAVE IT TO THEM. A COMPLETE GAME-CHANGING PLAY THAT GOES AGAINST WISCONSIN. 7-POINT SWING. WOW.

Last night refs have been part of crazy rulings before such as the CMU untimed down vs Oklahoma State, Minnesota vs Michigan 2024 onside kick. Research done by @ironfbstats

The clock is at 0:00 and the defender hasn’t touched the ball yet.

College football is so back holy fuck what an ending to this Michigan game 🤯