What do we actually know about IgG4 antibodies after repeated mRNA vaccination? 🧬 👉YT 13 min breakdown on pandemic effect outcome: youtu.be/FH_FKUajfSw 👉Full video breakdown (50 min): patreon.com/merogenomics/pos… #Immunology #Science #IgG4

“Five minutes after birth, they decide your name, religion, nationality and sect. And you spend the rest of your life defending what you did not choose.” — Arthur Schopenhauer

That's a good question for John Ratcliffe. We are currently litigating 5 #FOIA cases against the CIA about COVID origins, and the CIA is stonewalling all of them.

🚨Have any U.S., U.S.-based, or U.S.-funded scientists who work with live bat coronaviruses testified PUBLICLY before Congress? US-funded Ralph Baric, Linfa Wang, Lanying Du, & Fang Li were Wuhan collaborators but NEVER called publicly. Why not?

Tonight! ⏰ Join Vincent Racaniello for Office Hours to answer your questions about viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, Mpox virus, poliovirus, influenza virus, and more on this livestream on Wednesday 9/23/26 at 8pm Eastern US. 📺 bit.ly/4rtx44V

My opening remarks from today's meeting:

We need a two-thirds vote of the full committee to authorize this immunity resolution. Only one Democrat showed up. They chose not to come, not to debate, and not to vote. Every Republican is here. Democrats are once again obstructing the COVID investigation and protecting Anthony Fauci over the truth.

What is the justification for blacking out a list of engineered coronavirus mutations ? Fang Li had an interest in MERS-CoV spike mutations that enhanced infectivity in humans, including its FCS (along with Baric and ZLS)

Herewith the hits within the ncbi patent database

In 1985, Carl Sagan sat in front of the United States Senate and described the weather of 2026. Not as prediction. As physics. Sitting across from him was a junior senator named Al Gore — who would later win the Nobel Prize, the Oscar, and build a climate investment fund worth over $36 billion repeating almost word for word what Sagan said that afternoon. Sagan opened with Venus. 470°C surface temperature. 900°F. Hot enough to melt lead. "Not because it's closer to the sun," he told the senators. "Venus actually reflects more light than Earth. It should be cooler." The reason it wasn't: carbon dioxide. A runaway greenhouse effect that turned a planet nearly identical to Earth into a furnace. Then he looked at the committee and said: we're running the same experiment here. The senators nodded politely. Then they went back to approving fossil fuel subsidies. What Sagan told Congress in 1985: Global average temperature will rise several degrees by mid-to-late next century. Local climates will redistribute. Glaciers will melt. Sea levels will rise. And the problem cannot be solved by any single nation — not even if the US and Soviet Union agreed on everything — without China. China, he said, had the world's largest coal reserves and was about to industrialize. Every sentence was correct. He also said something that got almost no coverage at the time: "The initial stages of global temperature increase — one region might benefit while another suffers." That is the sentence that explains the last 20 years of geopolitics. Canada's growing season expanding while Pakistan floods. Russia opening Arctic shipping lanes while Bangladesh disappears. The politics of climate was never going to be clean because the physics wasn't distributed evenly. Sagan mapped all of it from first principles, in a Senate hearing room, 41 years ago. The part nobody quotes: He didn't say stop burning fossil fuels immediately. He said: "That has such severe economic consequences that no one will take it seriously." So he proposed something else — remove government subsidies from fossil fuels, accelerate solar, develop safe nuclear fission, and begin building international frameworks before the crisis made them impossible. That's not an environmentalist's speech. That's an economist's. Carl Sagan wrote 20 books. Cosmos was watched by 500 million people across 60 countries. He won the Pulitzer. The ideas in this testimony became the scientific foundation for a carbon market now valued at over $800 billion annually. He said one line at the end that nobody remembers. "We are all in this greenhouse together." In 1985, that was poetic. Now it's a weather report. The full testimony is free on YouTube. 17 minutes. Almost nobody outside of climate policy circles has watched it as a complete predictive model — laid out in plain language before any of it happened.

BioNTech, Mainz, heute Morgen: Brand in einem Laborgebäude. Die ausführliche Feuerwehrmeldung macht den Einsatz größer, als es die erste Kurzmeldung vermuten ließ: ca. 60 Feuerwehrkräfte, rund 80 Einsatzkräfte insgesamt, dazu THW, Polizei, Rettungsdienst und medizinischer Katastrophenschutz. Drei Personen wurden medizinisch versorgt und vorsorglich ins Krankenhaus gebracht. Das Feuer selbst war nach etwa einer Stunde gelöscht – der gesamte Einsatz dauerte wegen aufwendiger Entrauchungsmaßnahmen rund fünf Stunden. Interessant ist die Informationslage: Die Feuerwehr meldete zunächst ausdrücklich einen „Brand in einem Laborgebäude, An der Goldgrube“. In der späteren Abschlussmeldung ist nur noch allgemein von einem „Brandereignis auf dem Gelände von BioNTech“ die Rede. BioNTech erklärte gegenüber Medien, der Brand sei in der Abzugsanlage eines Labors entstanden. Offen bleiben bislang jedoch die eigentlich relevanten Fragen: Welches Labor? Welche Abzugsanlage? Welche Stoffe befanden sich dort? Wurden Gefahrstoffmessungen durchgeführt? Was ergaben sie? Und wodurch entstand der Brand? Wichtig: Es gibt derzeit keinen belastbaren Hinweis auf einen biologischen Zwischenfall oder irgendeinen Zusammenhang mit bestimmten Forschungsprogrammen. Aber bei einem Laborbrand mit 80 Einsatzkräften und drei Krankenhausabklärungen darf man die technischen Details durchaus wissen wollen. Ich bleibe dran. 🔎🧬🚒

Couple of 100 patent hits with this 43 aa sequence, Query 1 PNLLSAEPKSCDKTHTCPPCPGKPAQASPSSSRRDRCPRVACI 43, not only vaccine related but also part of peptides blocking viral infections amongst others this sequence is a common tool in the laboratory

Paul Bieniasz discusses his lab’s discovery that the coronavirus nuclease NSP15 cuts viral RNA into oligonucleotides that are reinserted elsewhere in the viral RNA, generating insertion mutations at a frequency above 10⁻³ per genome. 📺 bit.ly/3ULtCGA

JUST NOW: In a major development, the leaders of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: John Swinney, Rhun ap Iorwerth and Michelle O’Neill, will meet tomorrow at the Cardiff summit to sign a joint declaration for all three countries to gain independence from the United Kingdom.

The Furin Cleavage Site : pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.08…

GSA was updated by Beijing Institute of Genomics, not WIV. How about that.... ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/C…

different mammalian ace2 orthologs & ratg13-sc2 rbd binding: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…

From the thesis of Yu Ping. drive.google.com/drive/folde…

Ra4991 "The full genome was obtained later in the year" 2018. No source info. Guess he later asked JC. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3863…