Seeing a lot of zk FUD on the TL today so let's actually talk about this properly.
On-chain privacy isn't going anywhere. It's also never going to be the only way the system works.
Here's the actual mechanism: once payments, agents, and identity move onchain, the reporting infrastructure that already tracks traditional finance moves with it.
Public chains are transparent by default, so that infrastructure ports over easily. Privacy tech resists that porting. That's exactly why it keeps getting squeezed.
We've watched this pattern three times, and each one is worth being precise about:
- Monero got delisted from major exchanges because compliance teams can't report what they can't see
- Tornado Cash is still live, but its founder is fighting a real prison sentence
- Silk Road shows this goes back further than crypto natives think. Even pseudonymity, not full privacy, got unwound in court
The mainstream rails will keep pushing for privacy they can live with, not privacy they can't see into. Full default opacity survives in the corners.
That's not a knock on Monero. I respect exactly what it represents: default privacy, real fungibility, no company to lean on. That's rare.
So privacy stays. It becomes a feature you switch on, not the operating assumption for the whole system. More than one approach gets to exist.