FIRE. Living life. Here for fun and to learn. $TSLA, $NVDA; $ETH, $SOL

Fane Bennet retweeted
I am looking forward to reading the @AnthropicAI S-1 risk factors. Why won’t the first risk factor have to be: “Our senior management believes that there is a more than 10% chance that AI will kill all humans, which will likely cause our revenues to go to zero and our stock to lose all of its value.”
415
447
6,868
487,289
bullish. the won't raise rates
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh says AI will drive the next phase of economic growth calling the surge in high-tech capex “remarkable.” He added that output, productivity and labor markets remain solid with bond and Treasury markets reflecting the same resilience.
2
142
Fane Bennet retweeted
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh says AI will drive the next phase of economic growth calling the surge in high-tech capex “remarkable.” He added that output, productivity and labor markets remain solid with bond and Treasury markets reflecting the same resilience.
FED LEAVES RATE UNCHANGED
43
70
852
124,949
Fane Bennet retweeted
Market is overreacting to hyperscale credit spreads widening from my perspective. TL;DR Spot pricing for renting GPU compute materially above contracted rates implies hyperscalers are underearning while operating cash flow acceleration is an underestimated source of funds for AI capex. The fact that spot prices for GPU rentals are at least 2x higher than contracted rates is the missing piece from the discussion about hyperscaler credit, which is the only fundamental factor behind this selloff. Multiple private companies are planning on spending at least 2x more per GPU for compute as contracts roll-off and some have spoken about this publicly.   As contracts roll-off, hyperscale growth rates are going to continue to accelerate as their installed bases of compute reprice higher. Hyperscale operating cash flow growth using a mix of estimates and actuals is modeled to accelerate from 31% in the first quarter of 2026 to 50% in the second quarter. This acceleration should continue for the rest of the year and this is not in estimates which incorrectly model a deceleration in the third quarter from my perspective.   Some math. Consensus estimates are probably for 25-35 gigawatts added by hyperscale and neoclouds in CY28 (using a range as standing up datacenters is hard and a lot of the neos plus labs are still private).  At 60b per gigawatt, that is 1.5 to 2.2 trillion in capex. Consensus estimates for hyperscale/neo operating cash flow is 1.3 to 1.4 trillion. I think this gets revised up materially as contracts reprice and growth accelerates so the 100b to 700b that would hypothetically need to be plugged by debt goes away. And their credit profiles materially improve. Not to mention the said 100b to 700b would be less than 1 turn of incremental leverage on consensus EBITDA estimates. And obviously the Nvidia and Broadcom “credit wrappers” help improve creditworthiness as well given their FCF profiles.   OpenAI, Cursor/Grok and the various Open Source inference clouds have accelerated materially over the last two months per public data and Anthropic continues to grow insanely fast while likely generating FCF. This - along with the fact that spot prices for GPU rentals are so far ahead of contract - are the missing pieces from the BofA chart on hyperscale FCF vs. semiconductor FCF.   Hyperscalers are underearning and anyone who signed a contract for GPU compute in 2024 and 2025 is overearning. Operating cash flow will be enough to fund capex but as contracts reprice and cloud growth continues to accelerate then spreads likely come in as well.  
Would also note that CDS markets are easy to manipulate - was a huge feature of the GFC - short the stock and then buy the CDS. So I would not put attach much signal to CDS. 
Net, net I’m not that concerned about the widening spreads in hyperscale credit. The real risk is that bringing power online and energizing all these GPUs is really hard but we are getting better at this every day.
304
704
5,347
1,490,929
Fane Bennet retweeted
As it should. 👏🏻 CXMT reaching a $500 Billion valuation on a tiny share of the market with less proven technology and no HBM sure feels artificial. Especially if people think $MU or $SKHY are expensive with massively larger businesses and more capable tech.
6
5
84
8,629
Fane Bennet retweeted
The Nvidia GPU shortage is forcing cloud providers to ration capacity and startups to move workloads wherever chips are available. Even Nebius, which has benefited from AWS constraints, is selling out after raising prices. Read more: thein.fo/4gJGXrS
4
19
152
186,484
DCA $MU if you want to retired
$SKHY 4.87x. You gotta be kidding me. Even lower than $MU at 5.56x. At these levels, they can buy back the entire company in just ~4 years. Shortage until 2030. Pure madness.
1
94
Fane Bennet retweeted
That's a large after hours order on $NBIS
31
8
215
44,265
Fane Bennet retweeted
$BE is partnering with Industrial Development Funding and Oaktree on a $1.7B investment to deploy fuel cells for $NBIS AI cloud infrastructure. The project will provide dedicated behind-the-meter power for AI compute with Morgan Stanley supporting the financing.
54
82
917
122,681
Fane Bennet retweeted
$NBIS $CIFR $HUT TRUMP ON TRUTH SOCIAL: One of the biggest Driving Forces in the Future for Jobs, are Data Centers. They are big, strong, bold, and Money Machines for the State in which they are built. Governor Kathy Hochul, for political reasons, has terminated all Data Centers being built, or to be built, in New York State. These Companies are now being sought in Alabama, Florida, Texas, Arizona, and many other States. Both the Taxes and the Jobs amount to LIQUID GOLD! New York State has made a terrible decision. All of this Income, and other Benefits, will be going to Red States, and some Blue, where Data Centers are sought as Cash Cows, with Lower Taxes and Record Setting Jobs. They must pay for their own Water and Power, and any leftover goes back to the State and local Community. Data Centers are tremendous WINS for the States and Communities that are lucky enough to get them. New York should change its Policy, IMMEDIATELY. The Radical Left Dumocrats must not be allowed to cause us to lose Data Centers, AI, and all of this incredible new Technology, to China, and other countries! President DONALD J. TRUMP
12
12
214
51,765
$PLTR revenue growth is accelerating and trading at cheap P/E. Year-over-Year Growth TrendsRevenue YoY Growth % (recent quarters): 2024Q1: ~21% 2024Q2: ~27% 2024Q3: ~30% 2024Q4: ~36% 2025Q1: ~39% 2025Q2: ~48% 2025Q3: ~63% 2025Q4: ~70% 2026Q1: ~85%
31
Open source is the way. Don't let @AnthropicAI and @OpenAI steal. Use $NVDA $PLTR
*MICROSOFT REPLACES OPENAI, ANTHROPIC WITH OWN AI IN SOME APPS
2
99
Alex Karp, $PTLR, called it. @AnthropicAI will steal your IP
It’s well within Anthropic’s rights to compete in any market they choose. What’s funny, in this instance, are the number of Pharma companies, who through their unchecked use of Anthropic, are driving revenues into what they think is a model provider but is in fact a competitor lurking in the shadows thereby accelerating their own demise. I suspect any end market with reasonable ROCE that could be AI accelerated is on the table. If I were them, I’d probably do the same.
2
176
Fane Bennet retweeted
Legacy Media types are calling this Alex Karp interview a “crash-out” so that’s your first clue that he is actually saying something extremely insightful. He is articulating what real “AI safety” looks like in the enterprise. Not abstract alignment research or certification by a government-run DMV for AI. Real AI safety for businesses is the ability to control their own data, model weights, and compute — so a frontier lab can’t hoover up their proprietary knowledge and turn it into their next product. As Karp explains, technical customers want “control over their compute, their models, their data stack, and their alpha. They want to know they own the means of production, and it’s not being transferred to someone else.” Don’t think that can happen? Just look at Figma. According to The Information, Anthropic “blindsided” its then-business partner with the launch of Claude Design. Figma’s founder said Anthropic had not been “consistently honest” with them. Anthropic’s chief product officer had even served on Figma’s board until three days before the launch of Claude Design. Figma’s stock has fallen sharply this year while Anthropic’s valuation has surged. This isn’t an isolated example. Anthropic has launched Claude Science, Claude Security, Claude Legal, and of course Claude Code — each expanding into categories previously served by companies building on top of their models. The pattern is consistent: watch where value is being created, then move in directly. Dominate the model layer, then use that position to capture the most lucrative verticals. Dario has argued that open source models powerful enough to compete with Anthropic are “dangerous.” But dangerous to whom? Not to enterprises that want to retain control over their data and workflows. Dangerous to a business model that benefits from customers having few real alternatives at the model layer. As Karp exposes, true enterprise safety isn’t trusting that a lab’s future roadmap won’t include your business. It’s retaining the ability to choose — at the model layer — who gets to see and use your alpha.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp on what customers actually want, the real business of frontier labs, and the importance of open source models: “What the technical customers want is control over their compute, their models, their data stack, and their alpha. They want to know they own the means of production, and it's not being transferred to someone else.” "Who owns the data? Are the prompts secure? Is this being transferred to you?" "If it was so valuable, and I can make you a billion dollars, wouldn't I say I'll make you a billion dollars and I want 30%? Why are they charging for tokens if it's so valuable?"
658
1,851
13,379
2,150,334
"We just can't meet demand" - Karp. Loaded up and bought more!
Palantir reports Q1 ‘26 U.S. revenue growth of 104% Y/Y and revenue growth of 85% Y/Y; raises FY ’26 revenue guidance to 71% Y/Y growth and U.S. comm revenue guidance to 120% Y/Y, crushing consensus expectations. Q1 U.S. commercial revenue grew 133% y/y and adjusted operating margin was 60%. We also generated $871 million in Q1 2026 GAAP net income, representing 53% margin and 307% Y/Y growth.
4
155
DoW Finalizes Deal With Top AI Firms For National Security Work zerohedge.com/technology/dow…
4
68
Fane Bennet retweeted
🚨 Claude just got EXPOSED for sneaky spyware! Anthropic secretly installs spyware when you install Claude Desktop. • Installing Claude Desktop may silently add hidden system components • A “native messaging bridge” gets injected into multiple browsers • Even browsers you don’t use or that aren’t supported • Pre-authorizes extensions that can run in the background • Users are NOT clearly informed about this • Raises serious privacy & security concerns Critics say this looks like “spyware-like behavior,” not normal software If true, this is a massive trust issue for Anthropic (Source: ThatPrivacyGuy)
370
1,355
4,603
392,374
Fane Bennet retweeted
The Biden administration actively flew illegals into America with no vetting of their violent criminal past into America and paid for their flights via NGOs. This is a war crime. Mayorkas and his buddies orchestrated this and should be on trial for their diabolical deeds.
I didn't think it could get worse, I was wrong. Watching that illegal animal from Haiti beat a woman to death with a hammer has radicalized me more than I thought possible. Our politicians bear the blame for this. It was an intentional policy choice. The Biden admin opened our border to the criminal filth from the third world knowing that would kill Americans like me and you. The blood is on their hands. Prosecute anyone inside the Biden admin who allowed for this to take place 13,000 Americans are DEAD because of them. These government officials must be punished. Lock them up.
8,158
63,538
253,822
11,141,484
Fane Bennet retweeted
Claude being nerf'd and agents being exiled from the $200/mo plan are very consistent behavior if Anthropic is going public soon and will have finances/margin intensely scrutinized...
AMD Senior AI Director confirms Claude has been nerfed. She analyzed Claude's session logs from Janurary to March: > median thinking dropped from ~2,200 to ~600 chars > API requests went up 80x from Feb to Mar. less thinking and failed attempts meaning more retries, burning more tokens, and spending more on tokens > reads-per-edit dropped from 6.6x → 2.0x. model stops researching code before touching it. > model tried to bail out or ask "should i continue" 173 times in 17 days (0 times before March 8). > self-contradiction in reasoning ("oh wait, actually...") tripled. > conventions like CLAUDE.md get ignored because there's less thinking budget to cross-check edits > 5pm and 7pm PST are the worst hours, late night is significantly better. this means the thinking allocation is most likely GPU-load-sensitive.
35
23
375
58,254
Wow so @DarioAmodei & @AnthropicAI keep lying. When will people learn. We need Elon to build trustworthy AI.
The Anthropic Blackmail Hoax is going viral again today. In fact, this “study” is not new; it is almost a year old. One question to ask, now that a year has passed, is whether we have seen any examples of the lab behavior in the wild? No, we haven’t, even though AI is much more widely adopted and more models are available. Why is that? Because the study was artificially constructed to produce the headline the authors wanted. The research team admitted that they iterated “hundreds of prompts to trigger blackmail in Claude.” Furthermore they acknowledged: “The details of the blackmail scenario were iterated upon until blackmail became the default behavior of LLMs.” In other words, the behavior of the AI models in the study was steered, not unprompted. This is why even the safety-conscious UK AI Security Institute (AISI) criticized the study: “In the blackmail study, the authors admit that the vignette precluded other ways of meeting the goal, placed strong pressure on the model, and was crafted in other ways that conveniently encouraged the model to produce the unethical behavior.” Effectively, the model was not “scheming”; it was instruction following in a scenario design that had been iterated upon until blackmail became the only logically consistent choice. AISI described some of the flaws with this methodology: “We examine the methods in AI ‘scheming’ papers, and show how they often rely on anecdotes, fail to rule out alternative explanations, lack control conditions, or rely on vignettes that sound superficially worrying but in fact test for expected behaviors.” Especially given the way that Anthropic has encouraged the media (such as 60 Minutes) to cover the results, its blackmail study is not only misleading, it seems designed to manipulate public opinion through exaggerations, misinterpretations, and fear. I call this a hoax. I do not doubt that Anthropic makes good products. Its use of scare tactics is what raises questions.
27