I think the Zachxbt post about hardware wallets is being taken wildly out of context.
Using a jailbroken airgapped smart phone can have its benefits as a daily driver wallet, but the audience in which he said that in probably also wasn’t meant to be picked up by numerous news outlets and consumed by the masses.
Although the discourse caused by this may be valuable, this has opened our eyes to just how many people have sworn off hardware wallets due to missteps with the handling of customer data by wallet providers. Rather unfortunate.
Fundamentally we disagree because we still deal with users day in and day out with compromised seed phrases, and bespoke solutions don’t scale well. Proper Hardware wallets are still the strongest form of self custody that we have today that is accessible and will documented, especially now with clear text initiatives and hardware wallets with large screens.
Your security stack and behaviors aren’t about perfect or “doing what the pros do”, because we’ve dealt with developers and security professionals who have been hacked as well. Often. It should protect yourself from yourself, as well as reducing your overall attack surface.
Also, there is value in subscribing to a shared security model across the space that is proven, accessible, and easy to use. The amount of flexing like “never been hacked, just don’t click weird links dummy” we’ve seen on the timeline as a result of this debacle is maddening, but overall I am eager to see this conversation unfold, because it’s an important one.
We are team hardware wallet. Solidly on the team that “doesn’t want to have to trust a phone manufacturer with a million competing priorities to not accidentally leak my notes app logs in some SIRI AI training data when a rogue model erroneously sweeps a few thousand wallets for some Skynet, type shit.