Math ain't conscious. AI is not conscious. I am right about this. If you disagree you are wrong. This is a classic bifurcation between midwits and those that are actually intelligent. Don't end up on the wrong side, you'll look so stupid if you're saying models are conscious.

Legacy media REFUSED to show you a SINGLE SECOND of President Trump's speech and historic state dinner with Xi Jinping tonight at the White House So here's the ENTIRE thing, from start to finish, with translations for Xi's speech DO NOT LET LEGACY MEDIA KEEP YOU IN THE DARK

Artificial intelligence systems do not think, feel, want or understand. Avoid language that gives them human characteristics. This is called anthropomorphizing, when we ascribe human traits, emotions or behaviors to non-human things, such as animals or inanimate objects. Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it. apnews.com/article/openai-sa…

We’ve updated our timeline for full RSI to July 2027 instead of August after our eval of Opus 5.5. It’s telling that the biggest advocate for pacing is still very much racing ahead. Even the most rational can fall prey to this multi polar trap. The only solution is coordination.

Here are some vibe predictions of what I expect to happen in AI. Within 6 months: computer use big moment, office workers start adopting agentic AI in masse Within 12 months: we learn of communities consistent of thousands of autonomous agents interacting through the internet By end of 2027: AI revenues somewhere between $0.5-1 trillion By mid 2028: all millennium problems solved, AI is being used for all STEM work as much as today in math, breakthrough scientific advances in other domains By end of decade: robots aplenty, they work with precision, they are in the tens of millions and we are ramping up capacity to build more, fast. Job displacement is huge, AI is a huge political topic By 2035: AI reaches cognitive parity with humans in all domains, pro AI rights movements are picking up, economy is moving faster than >10%/year growth By 2040: there are >10x more general purpose robots than humans, economic growth is >30% year (10x faster than today)

i don't think nearly anyone, myself included, has truly internalized there'll soon be a machine better than us in every single intellectual & physical capacity deep down we all share a feeling that our 'entrepreneurship' or 'taste' or... is special & safe. it isn't. it's over

Many people think that LLMs are limited by human training data, but pretraining is just establishing a common sense baseline. Most compute goes into reinforcement learning now, allowing models to move beyond the human level by exploring themselves, just as they did with Go.

Read this. Read all of it. And then draw your own conclusion. My conclusion: he’s right on.

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free) • Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code era. Claude Code is still part of the assistance era - Jev is the next step Jev is x200 faster, x400 cheaper and has 0 hallucination. This is what comes after RLHF" In 17 minutes he explains why every model you use has a human-shaped flaw baked into it and why Jev is better worth more than a $500 Claude Code engineering course watch today, then read how to actually boost yourself x100 with Jev in the post below

"AI writes terrible code." Does it work? Yes. Do the tests pass? Yes. Can another AI understand and modify it? Yes. Then I have terrible news about how much your definition of terrible code matter. Humans aren't reading this stuff for much longer, many already stopped.