More bad news on the new Harry Potter show. Not only is Snape now black, but #malfoid is now a boy :(

🚨💥GREECE 🇬🇷 Here is Greece's Border Force firing live ammunition at a boat full of illegals and pushing them back into Turkish waters. Greece has passed a law that will deport all illegal immigrants arriving from Africa. Should all European countries implement this decision?

The men on the Clancy jury should keep mentioning how hot they think she is in order to reverse psychology the female jurors into hating her

I think that Trump renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America is pointless and stupid. Wanna know what else I think is dumb? The fact left-wingers are triggered about this after they spent the last decade plus renaming sports teams, public schools and universities, streets and highways, food and condiment brands, and redefining half the dictionary altogether. Here’s a list of some in case you forgot: • Washington Redskins ➡️ Commanders • Cleveland Indians ➡️ Guardians • Stanford Indians ➡️ Cardinals • Loudoun County Raiders ➡️ Captains • Edmonton Eskimos ➡️ Elks • Columbus Day ➡️ Indigenous Peoples’ Day • Lee–Jackson Day ➡️ eliminated • Robert E. Lee High School ➡️ John Lewis High • Jefferson Davis Highway ➡️ Richmond Highway • Mount McKinley ➡️ Denali • Fort Bragg ➡️ Fort Liberty • Fort Hood ➡️ Fort Cavazos • Boy Scouts of America ➡️ Scouting America • Aunt Jemima ➡️ Pearl Milling Company • Uncle Ben’s Rice ➡️ Ben’s Original • Eskimo Pie ice cream bars ➡️ Edy’s Pie • Land O’Lakes ➡️ removed the Indian, but kept the land • Illegal alien ➡️ undocumented worker • Hispanic ➡️ Latinx (a term Hispanics did not want and do not use) • Mother ➡️ birthing person • Anchor baby ➡️ child of noncitizens • black ➡️ Black • Breastfeeding ➡️ chest feeding • Inmate / prisoner / convict / felon ➡️ justice-involved person • Ex-con / ex-felon ➡️ returning citizen • “Gender” as a biological fact interchangeable with “sex” to being a social construct • Fat ➡️ plus-sized • Master bedroom ➡️ primary bedroom • Manhole ➡️ utility hole And so on and so on. . .

Carney walked out of U.S. trade talks at one minute to midnight and called it a war. It isn’t about tariffs. It’s a midterm operation, and Scott Bessent is fighting the war Carney doesn’t want you to notice.

Jason Arday wasn’t a fantasist or serial liar. He wasn’t a poster boy for the woke-Left or an unfairly hounded victim of the far-Right. Jason Arday was a criminal, and he chose suicide rather than face the consequences of his crimes. In the UK, fraud is formally prosecuted under the Fraud Act 2006. This defines fraud as false representation, which means lying or misleading someone intentionally; as failure to disclose information you have a legal duty to share; or as abuse of a position of trust. A person is guilty of fraud if he knowingly commits the above offences in order to make a gain for himself or another, or to cause loss to another or expose them to the risk of loss. The gain or loss may be money or other property, including intellectual. A person guilty of fraud is liable, on conviction, to imprisonment for up to 10 years, or to a fine, or to both. Criminal prosecutions for fraud are handled by the Crown Prosecution Service. Civil actions are pursued by victims to recover lost money. Jason Arday was guilty of committing all three categories of fraud; but whom did he defraud, and of what? The first group of people defrauded by Jason Arday is the British taxpayer who funded the various grants he was awarded to gain his degrees at Bachelors, Masters and Doctoral level. None of his degrees should have been awarded, and he never should have received the funding to undertake them. So the British taxpayer has been defrauded of money that should have gone to a genuine student or students producing work of benefit to our society, not DEI rubbish about decolonising the very academic institutions he was defrauding. To be sure, Arday himself wasn’t responsible alone for this fraud, and the various academics who oversaw his theses and the boards that awarded him the degrees are also guilty of fraud, and should be investigated and, if found guilty of complicity to defraud the British taxpayer, compelled to refund the cost of the funding. The second group of people defrauded by Jason Arday are the academics who were not awarded the positions in academia he was granted. Following the awarding of his fraudulent academic credentials, Arday was appointed to a bewildering succession of positions, including, in 2018, a senior lectureship at the University of Roehampton before he had published a single academic paper; an associate professorship, two years later, at the University of Durham; a professorship, two years after that, at the University of Glasgow; and, finally, a year later, in 2023, a professorship at the University of Cambridge. In a mere five years, therefore, Arday went from an unpublished student to a Professor earning in excess of £100,000/per year at one of the highest ranked universities in the world. These positions, and the financial rewards and career benefits they brought Arday, should all have gone to academics with real degrees, who had conducted real research and written real books that made significant and, given the seniority and prestige of these posts, contributions to the field of sociology ranking with the best sociologists in the world. The third group of people defrauded by Jason Arday were the scholars whose dissertations, articles and books he plagiarised in his own, fraudulent academic work. It is sometimes hard for non-academic to understand the seriousness of plagiarism, particularly in an academic context. It means, first of all, that the plagiarist is unworthy of trust, and should never be allowed anywhere near an educational or pedagogical context in which they have authority over children, as Jason Arday was. But in more legal terms, plagiarism is theft. Academics have one form of capital, and it isn’t money. It is their intellectual property. Research, for an academic, is grabbed in the evenings they don’t spend with their wives or friends and the weekends of a professional life otherwise taken up by teaching, marking, and the growing administrative burden of the modern academic. Actually publishing an article or book typically requires the awarding of a grant sufficient to absent them from such work. When Jason Arday stole their work, he stole that grant, he stole those weekends, he stole those evenings, he stole their ideas. And by publishing their work as his own, he also stole the publishing opportunities and consequent career advancements denied to the plagiarised academics in favour of his fraudulent research. Again, Arday himself wasn’t only responsible for this fraud, and the editors and other people responsible for overseeing the integrity of academic and other scholarship are complicit in his defrauding of these plagiarised scholars. The fourth group of people defrauded by Jason Arday were the scholars who were not awarded the publishing contracts for books that were passed over for the garbage that Arday published. These included such titles as Dismantling Race in Higher Education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy, which was published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2018; Cool Britannia and Multi-Ethnic Britain: Uncorking the Champagne Supernova, which was published by Routledge in 2020, which is the sort of thing a hack like Owen Jones might write but is not consistent with a Professor of Sociology at Cambridge University; We See Things They'll Never See: Love, Hope and Neurodiversity, a sort of self-help book through pop songs published by Princeton University Press in 2025; and his memoir, Great and Unfortunate Things, which was published this year by Simon & Schuster, and which, again, is not the academic work expected and required of such a senior academic in such a prestigious institution. Again, Arday was not alone in defrauding genuine academics out of the book deals they were passed over for this tripe, and it’s indicative of the commercialisation of academia in the UK that academic positions are now awarded not on the academic worth of the candidate’s research but on the book sales of fluff like this that is paid for and promoted by publishers more interested in a DEI readership than in academic rigour. The fifth group of people defrauded by Jason Arday, and by far the most with a grievance against him, are his students. In the time he occupied these elevated academic positions, Arday would have taught, or occupied the position of teaching, thousands of students. They or their parents will have paid thousands of pounds each, up front or in the student debts they have accumulated, to be taught by someone unqualified to do so. Not only have they been defrauded out of their money, they have also been defrauded out of the education they paid for. For the rest of their lives, there will be a question, not least in their own head, of the value of the degree they were awarded studying under this fraud. If they themselves go on to be academics, their every job interview will have the shadow of his fraud hanging over them. Reports have now come out that numerous students did, indeed, complain about the lack of teaching they received from Jason Arday, and they were greeted with the same response that investigative journalists received when they researched the actual qualifications and academic and other claimed achievements of this fraud — that is, they were accused of racism. I sincerely hope that every student taught by Jason Arday pursues claims for the return of their fees and compensation for the loss of the education against every university at which he taught them; and I hope that these are sufficiently ruinous to bring these institutions down as a warning to other UK universities of the costs of being complicit in this fraud. Once again, charges should be brought against not only the universities whose purpose is to oversee academic excellence and not the enforcement of DEI policies of racial discrimination against White people, but also against the specific academics who created Jason Arday. That includes the thesis supervisors and examiners who passed his racist dribble, the heads of departments and schools who hired him, the board members of the DEI committees who promoted him, and all the other sycophants who celebrated his fraud. And, finally, the sixth group of people defrauded by Jason Arday is the British people. Arday sat on numerous charities, boards, committees and other DEI institutions not only funded by the British taxpayer but devoted to the erasure of British culture and the demographic replacement of the British people in our homeland. To this end, Arday was awarded numerous honorary doctorates, fellowships and academic awards and given a correspondingly wide public platform to spread his message of hate and racial discrimination against White people. Given the infiltration and indoctrination of every UK institution, of which the department of sociology at Jesus College, Cambridge University, is only one example among hundreds of thousands, and which includes our schools, councils, cultural institutions, media, police forces and law courts, it is highly unlikely that Jason Arday would have faced the prosecution and justice he deserved. UK courts have repeatedly made it clear that, if you’re Black, you can rape a White woman or stab a White man and received desultory and minimal sentences far lower than the White people who protest the rape or killing, and Jason Arday would have been treated no differently. It was the reporter who tried to investigate his fraud that was the object of a police investigation rather than Arday, and he would, at worst, have been sufficiently publicly disgraced that he couldn’t hold an academic post for a year or two before being awarded an even more lucrative and prestigious post at some US university devoted to the advancement of ‘scholars of colour’. I am not happy that Jason Arday took his own life. I wanted to him to face the full force of the law under UK legislation, and for him and those who aided and abetted his fraud to pay the costs in fines, prison sentences and institutional bankruptcy. I would also hope that his example would force a review of and removal from British public life of DEI criteria, which have never been written into any UK legislation but which have been enforced on the British people by every institution, business and employer in the UK. Arday is only one of tens of thousands of DEI hires who occupy senior positions in the public life of Britain who are also frauds, and who are committing the crime of fraud against the British people they have artificially and fraudulently been given authority over according to DEI criteria. As I said, I very much doubt that any due process, legal or otherwise, would have been implemented in what the UK has become; but now, with Arday’s suicide, any attempt to do so will be met from the woke-Left as a ‘desecration of his name’, etc. Jason Arday’s final crime, therefore, was committed against White people, who will continue to be subjected, after his death, to the unrelenting attacks on our race, our culture, our history, our identity, our values and our continued existence to which the fraudulent life of this Black criminal was dedicated.

This is clearly a sign from God that we need to build several orbital kinetic strike weapons

The affordability discussion is an issue and will be an issue in the midterms. It has always been an issue, but much bigger since the dems under the dotard Biden decided to flood the country with trillions of printed paper dollars and 10s of millions of illegals. Prices are sticky and mass deflation leads to economic destruction at the great depression levels so it's a tricky balancing act. The goal is disinflation turning to a small benign deflationary push on certain items, not massive deflation. That goal is being met, mostly, as the rate of inflation has come down over the last 18 months. The Trump admin has done a lot to reduce the problem with millions deported, lower taxes, lower prescription drug prices, lower home prices, lower interest rates, increasing supply through deregulation, lower energy prices before the Iran conflict and keeping them from returning to the biden highs during the conflict, increasing wages, rearranging the government spending, laying off government employees and on and on. It's a much better trend today than under Biden and the dems. Is it perfect? No. Will it ever be perfect? No. Is it good? Yes. Will it get better if the dems win Congress? Definitely not. Are there ways to reduce your expenses and keep the same standard of living or even increase it? Yes. Do you have to live on rice and beans to do it? It's much quicker if you do, but it's not needed. All it really takes is a couple mins of thought before you spend your hard earned money on stupid stuff or stuff that you could easily do for yourself with a little effort. When I went to the grocery store under Biden and the dems I saw my ability to keep pace destroyed every time as food prices seemed to rise daily. Today, when I go, I still bitch about the cost, but at least I don't see the massive daily increases that I saw under Biden. Now I can managed my budget without worrying about what type of increase the next day will bring. Now, I have the ability to pick and choose options depending on price. Competition is returning instead of constant inflation on all products, all the time under Biden and the dems. It will take more time, but things are better today than they were 2 years ago and the future looks brighter today than it did 2 years ago. I don't want to go back to the economic horrors we had under dem leadership and I think if people really stop and consider what things were like back then, they won't want to go back either.

Homer describes Helen as white and everything else is mental gymnastics. I want to prove to you once again that those who pretend to be educated are the truly uneducated ones otherwise they act in bad faith. Odysseus left the island of Calypso and continued his journey of return to Ithaca as he should, alone on a raft, without gods or men with him. He sailed on the open sea for 17 days. On the 18th, while land appeared in the distance, Poseidon, who was returning from the land of the Ethiopians, saw him and raised a storm. Odysseus’s raft was shattered and Odysseus found himself in the waves with a magical veil that Leukothea had given him in the midst of the sea-tempest. For two days he struggled with the waves. On the third day, with the help of Athena, he managed to approach the land through the mouth of a river. Salvation, mental or physical, comes only when you are ready to do everything for your survival. Take a look at the name "Leukothea" that Homer used. "Leukothea" was named thus from the white waves because she threw herself into the sea and committed suicide. I love philosophy, but I also love philology. The word “leukos” exists in the Greek language and the word is Homeric, that is, it is found in Homer. According to the LSJ dictionary it means: light, bright, of colour, white, of the human skin, white, fair, of persons, white-skinned etc. So then we come to the famous word of recent months that characterizes Helen of Sparta and not only her, however. “But Iris came again as a messenger to white-armed Helen” – Homer, Rhapsody Γ, line 121 Eλένῃ λευκωλένῳ = to white-armed Helen The word “leukōlenō” is composed of the words “Leukos” (which means the colour white as we said above) and the word “ōlenē” which is the arm. Thus the word means “the one who has white arms.” Homer describes Helen, Andromache, Hera, Persephone, female slaves, and handmaids, all of them, as “white-armed,” meaning white skin. There is literally no other translation on the LSJ lexicon. Nothing about working classes. But the word “leukos” exists as a compound and also non-compound in many places within the Homeric epics to denote the whiteness of the skin. He applies the exact same epithet to all women: goddesses, noble mortals, and slaves alike. The LSJ lexicon lists only one meaning: “leukolenos” means “white-armed,” having white arms, literally white skin. Nothing about working classes in the 1200 BC. For the Greeks there were no criteria based on skin colour, yet there were the words to describe the colour of the skin. As for example the Ethiopians. It comes from the word “aithops” which in Greek means: the one who has a fiery appearance, as if he has been burned, the black, the dark one. The Greeks saw the Ethiopians and named them according to their black skin. Simple as that. The Greeks were always localists, tribalists and racialists. Always proud of their city and their origin. In fact they were so racialist that a few years later, together with the founding of the Olympic Games as well as other panhellenic festivals, they also had the Hellanodikai. The Hellanodikai investigated the origin and the bloodline of every athlete who was obliged to prove that he was Greek and not a barbarian and foreigner. Non-Greeks were forbidden to participate in the games which were held in honour of the Gods of Olympus. They want to convince you that these Greeks lived in a multicultural Greece in 1200 BC and in 800 BC and in 500 BC. Soon they will tell us that against the Persians the Greeks also had Africans helping them in the battles or they will tell us that Socrates had an African Ethiopian pupil. The Africans have their own history and the Greeks have ours. You are the racists, those of you who try with lies to falsify and change with propaganda and with the promotion of pseudo-history without historical sources the truth about my civilization and my ancestors. You are the real racists. Homer Pavlos

Always the trans flag colors.

“Do you guys remember Peanut? Peanut the squirrel. And they killed him. Killed him like a dog. That’s who these people are. We can’t ever forget that.”

Several ways forward here given the choice of Roberts/Barrett to nullify the 14th Amendment and extra-constitutionally replace it with their own language: 1) Nullification. States issue birth certificates, and they can just stop issuing them to non-citizens. Roberts/Barrett can deal with the fallout and litigate each birth individually. 2) Pack the court. If Robert wants to be a politician who writes laws instead of a judge, then he can fight with 10 more unelected legislators in robes. 3) Deny entry to all pregnant foreigners. 4) Deny entry to all female foreigners. 5) Require sterilization of all foreign visitors prior to entry. 6) Dissolution of the Union. A nation which can’t even restrict who gets to be a citizen isn’t a nation. 7) Amend the Constitution. This is pointless, because once a judge decides he can rewrite the Constitution at will (as Roberts and Barrett did today), the actual text is meaningless. But this is what most GOP politicians gravitate towards because they are useless. If you think all these options are not great, understand that that is what happens when unelected judges decide that they are in charge of the country and get to write its laws.

RT if you are anti-Islamocommie

When I got arrested for Nazi Pug, I got held in jail until my court date due to the "serious nature" of my "offence". But the guy who threw a toddler into a crocodile enclosure to try and have him ripped limb from limb has already been bailed the very next day. Clown country.

OpenAI uncovered a China-linked campaign that tried to turn Americans against AI data centers by posing as regular people online. The posts focused on rising electricity demand, water use, and the impact of large data centers on local communities. OpenAI investigator Ben Nimmo said the campaign was “jumping onto the bandwagon of a genuine pre-existing domestic debate” rather than creating a new issue. According to OpenAI, the operation tried to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” but showed little sign of impact. Nimmo said, “We didn’t see any signs that they succeeded.”

Canada’s chief export is seething resentment

It’s so mysterious when a big new game fails. Maybe if they made the characters even uglier it would have succeeded.