Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @CNBC
Interesting
691
291
11,849
1,646,549
Replying to @CNBC
weird that advertising your mental illness isn't a career advancer
72
197
10,799
109,033
Replying to @CNBC
53
258
6,215
81,322
Replying to @CNBC
Pronouns = high likelihood of mental instability and / or marxist indoctrination
25
84
3,313
50,057
Replying to @CNBC
They/Them is like a face tattoo. It’s not a guarantee that the employee is gonna be a problem in the workplace but it ups the odds significantly
24
64
2,935
75,956
Replying to @CNBC
Imagine not wanting an annoying ass HR complaint / lawsuit filing liability being hired voluntarily Costing you millions down the road cause you asked them to use “boys” restroom like the other guys in the office
21
54
2,706
57,603
Replying to @CNBC
Good. Unqualified people should not be hired for positions that can be filled by sane individuals.
13
34
2,506
50,146
Replying to @CNBC
I can’t imagine why
8
2,201
36,965
Replying to @CNBC
Because they might as well be writing “I’m mentally ill” on the application. Of course they’re not hired.
20
31
2,073
37,179
Replying to @CNBC
I'd imagine giving your employer the chore of addressing you in an entirely unnatural way may be a non-starter I fear.
19
23
2,032
45,490
Replying to @CNBC
“Resumes that reveal mental illness tend to be overlooked.” Shocker.
11
22
1,718
25,783
Replying to @CNBC
Lol. They aren’t being “overlooked”. Pronouns in a resume are the best thing to come along in hiring. Instantly a red flag to the bottom of the pile if not the garbage can.
17
13
1,713
27,682
Replying to @CNBC
How strange that companies would be less likely to hire people who demonstrate narcissism, fragility, attention-seeking & anti-scientific beliefs in their job application. Next thing, you'll be telling us people who are drunk at their job interview are less likely to be hired!
20
42
1,530
25,107
Replying to @CNBC
Yes, difficult people often are passed over.
17
7
1,389
64,568
Replying to @CNBC
2
7
1,400
33,895
Replying to @CNBC
Pronouns are a sign of narcissism.
15
20
1,497
33,790
Replying to @CNBC
There is a very understandable reason for this.
29
67
1,185
31,431
Replying to @CNBC
Nobody wants to deal with more headaches, complaining and mental illness Any logical employer is throwing your resume in the bin when they see “they/them”
9
12
1,320
19,400
Replying to @CNBC
It’s more than that, resumes with ANY Pronouns in bio are being tossed immediately. Nobody wants to work with perpetually offended people. Is this not an obvious thing?
17
20
1,121
29,948
Replying to @CNBC @kristinawong
I mean if you only have one position open how can you hire 'them'?!🤷‍♂️😂
33
39
888
43,539
Replying to @CNBC
As they should.
7
44
651
20,133
Replying to @CNBC
I am shocked that litigious people who try to force everyone around them to walk on eggshells are being overlooked.
1
10
650
10,927
Replying to @CNBC
Makes sense since most job postings are for one person and not multiple people
10
5
543
23,835
Replying to @CNBC
Any form of pronouns listed on applications or social media should be a red flag to potential employers looking for qualified and effective workers, rather than those likely to demand preferred or protected class status once hired. This is especially true of smaller businesses that cannot financially absorb the potential legal problems posed by hiring those who might be more concerned with social justice issues, than doing their jobs.
15
11
377
73,588
Replying to @CNBC
Because it's an enormous red flag.
2
1
544
28,024
Replying to @CNBC
What hiring manager in their right mind would hire a narcissist? If you have pronouns, you're a narcissist.
11
8
455
8,372
Replying to @CNBC
3
14
410
11,250
Replying to @CNBC
Y’all just now figured this out huh?
5
5
293
11,881
Replying to @CNBC
Weird. You’d think that hiring all of “them” for the price of one would be a steal of a deal.
17
2
287
19,794
Replying to @CNBC
Well yeah. A resume which literally mentions one's mental illness is not likely to get one a job.
2
7
450
8,040
Replying to @CNBC
When you have continually displayed you're likely to spend much more time sat in HR whining about how everyone is preventing you from existing, than doing the job you're paid for, it's hardly surprising.
6
2
263
8,241
Replying to @CNBC
I'm trying to hire an employee not a gang.
2
6
215
29,199
Replying to @CNBC
Of course they/them would be. As an employer, why would you want to walk into a problem and risk it at all? The pronouns are a signal to an employer that this person could be hard to deal with or find all the problems within your business. It’s natural to want to avoid this risk.
9
205
12,849
Replying to @CNBC
People that are looking to create conflict with employers through minor indifferences are likely to be overlooked. There I fixed it.
3
209
9,223
Replying to @CNBC
If I were a business owner, I’d put all resumes with pronouns in them where they belong…in the trash.
13
6
176
3,684
Replying to @CNBC
Why wouldn't companies overlook them? Why would you want a whiny, entitled brat who demands constant attention and plays the victim?
2
4
218
2,859