Building professional tools for getting more and better work done with agents. Founder of @hob_app Previously Director of Security Tooling R&D @OpenZeppelin

Las Vegas, NV, USA
Not just another agent orchestration tool. We're bringing the whole agent stack into one workspace so you can stop juggling new tools every two weeks.
hob is now available to everyone. The professional workspace for your whole agent stack. Try it today 👉 hob.dev
3
7
542
This should not bother you, offend you, or mess with your workflow. Inference is a commodity. Just swap out the best model every time there is a new best. This is why you dont want to couple your workspace to a single provider. always use the best, use hob.dev
Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo
72
Opus 5.5 makes so much sense right now.
ANTHROPIC JUST FILED FOR IPO The numbers are pretty wild since the growth is insane but so is the infrastructure bill: • Revenue: $4.59B (+1,088% YoY) • GAAP net loss: $41.97B • Compute spend: $7.3B (58% of total OpEx) • Cash: $20.3B
Community note
Anthropic confidentially submitted its draft S-1 to the SEC in June 2026, not today. The figures match Reuters reporting on details from its IPO prospectus. anthropic.com/news/confident… reuters.com/business/finan…
1
2
155
I mean, I guess you've already come to expect this... but this was live in hob within 20 minutes of announcement. 🏇
Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family. It’s a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, runs more than 30% faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.
2
2
112
We're in NVIDIA Inception 🟢 Who else is in? What's the most valuable perk you've actually used?
5
251
I worked 16 hours a day before ai, I work 16 hours a day with ai. Lesson in there?
2
4
89
Andrew D. Anderson retweeted
Replying to @finkd
Translation: "We're starting a new platform to harvest even more company data via our full technology stack & the Muse agent." Fixed it.
1
4
377
Had to try this "one line motion graphic prompt" from hob, using opus 5.5. Pointed it at the changes between last stable release and the release dropping tomorrow... zero extra guidance. Pretty impressive! Would benefit from a pro ofc, but just like it accelerated coding, now it will accelerate this creative work. Very cool!
3
102
Andrew D. Anderson retweeted
It’s also powerful enough to save “a billion lives.”
JUST IN: Bill Gates warns AI is powerful enough to cause "a billion deaths."
149
52
1,041
55,263
hot take: there is no such thing as an unnecessary feature anymore. If it sparks joy, build it. Keep your trajectory tight, but explore your inspirations too - it's never been cheaper or more fun.
1
3
67
This acceleration is fatiguing... unless you use hob.dev so that each new release is just another option on the same button. Then it's exhilarating. New toys! Stable workspace!
Once a month --> once a week --> every single day. Keeping up with new model launches is a full time job.
1
101
Andrew D. Anderson retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce calls to end mass KYC data collection, warning it puts crypto holders at risk of phishing and physical attacks. Pierce says the current KYC/AML system creates massive databases of sensitive information that can be hacked, leaked, or exploited. She's pushing for zero-knowledge proofs (ZK proofs) that could verify users meet regulatory requirements without exposing their personal information.
420
1,502
10,086
1,025,381
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to share this before it goes live, but I need people to know their agents don't need cloud browsers...
1
1
8
151
Agents are so capable today. You don't need someone else to host a browser so an agent can use it. We've had a browser in hob since v1, but v2 brings in deeper agent control functionality so YOUR agent can drive YOUR workspace including YOUR web. One app, your whole agent stack.
43
Big Corp wants you to think being your own cloud is scary. It's not. Do you have internet? Do you have a computer? Congrats, you're like three clicks from being your own agent cloud.
2
2
90
A liked my timeline before Meta showed up spamming @Muse and swearing like sailors. We didn't go mess up their unserious "Threads", why'd they have to come over here and mess up X? Is nothing sacred?
93
Repeat after me: I DO NOT WANT MY INFERENCE PROVIDER COUPLED TO MY WORKSPACE Thank you hob.dev for people who get it
RIP Cursor, the grok 4.7 release kinda screwed Cursor value because other models don't get enough usage it's extremely limited so having cursor is purely for grok and composer which both are pretty much behind at the moment. I don't see the point of having cursor sub right now.
1
4
199
The comments here are amazingly negative. All zombies and mutated organisms... people, the path to curing disease, extending life, and ushering in a litany of medical breakthroughs is laid out before us. Take your minds out of the horror films and start solving real problems.
BREAKING: Anthropic’s new wet lab produces its first discovery, with nearly 1,000 Claude agents autonomously uncovering a novel enzyme system after 21 hours of work.
1
111
Now hear me out ... the agent does the coding but only reveals it / commits it after you solve some very challenging leetcode problems. Seriously though, I get sad reading this and I hope we can make the agentic engineering experience engaging enough to keep the og engineers.
Holy cats I did not expect this post to blow to the far reaches of the internet. Since the internet loves to spin everything to fit their own biases, time to clear things up a bit: - Yes, I am seriously considering a career outside of software development. Most professional software developers I've talked to that have been in the industry for a long time feel the same as me—overwhelmed and/or bored. People that weren't developers before don't seem to care or understand this. But it's also kind of hard to switch careers when you're almost 40, so maybe I'll be stuck doing this until we're all robot slaves on UBI. -About half the comments misunderstood why I want to leave software development. I want to leave because I'm bored. I've coded for 20 years, enjoyed it very much, and now I don't code. Not a very surprising outcome. I'm sure if you took any craft tradesman and put them into a factory to build the same thing, 90% would want to quit. - No the industry is not dead, it's just shifting. I just have no interest in shifting with it. There will be less software engineers for sure but they aren't going away entirely. - I will still continue to support my assets and release the assets I had planned (Water Pro v4, Fire Pro, potentially the rivers add-on not sure yet). After that, I have no idea what I'll do. - People seem to think I am anti-AI. This is hilarious because I've always been very transparent about my AI usage and talked about it on here often. Personally do I think AI is good for humanity? Absolutely not. But as someone who is self-employed, it's either adapt or die. -For some reason people think my post was engagement bait or grifting? What better way to get new customers than to tell them "Hey, you can make all of my assets with AI in 10 minutes so I'm closing shop!" Tongue-in-cheek obviously, but what a ridiculous take on my post. Alright, done talking about this.
110
Solo founders are filling up my timeline... people... having cofounders is 100x more fun. No comparison. 100x interesting, 100x fun. Your agents wont tell you when an idea is bad, you're being unimaginative, etc. You need a human cofounder more than ever in the age of agents!
1
47
Andrew D. Anderson retweeted
There's something deeply unsafe about safetyism. We wish people a safe flight—yet flying commercially is almost perfectly safe. We don't wish people a safe drive—yet US roads are the equivalent of a 737 crashing every 48h, killing everyone aboard. But we scare people when they get in an airplane but not when they get in a car. The biggest opportunity we have to improve road safety is self-driving, yet there's lots of anti-self-driving safety talk, and self-driving is held to a *dramatically* superhuman safety bar. The din about AI safety has reached extreme tenor—yet there have been zero material safety incidents. And the positive benefits of AI could improve and save many lives. But the safetyists say we must slow down. We destroyed the nuclear power industry in this country nominally out of safety concerns, yet joule for joule nuclear power is *by far* the safest form of energy, even accounting for Chernobyl (a genuine disaster) and Three Mile Island (generally a non-event). Building and fire codes are supposedly there to protect us from unsafe buildings. But actually the red tape makes development slow and sometimes impossible. So the safetyism protects us from jobs, innovation, and reindustrialization. TSA was there nominally to protect us from terrorist threats—yet to the extent it pushes passengers at the margins from safe airplanes to dangerous roads, it actually kills not just time and money but actual humans. Safetyism is deeply unsafe.
91
114
959
45,125