Host of the Catholic Steel Man • Theologian • Writer • Educator | Unlocking Scripture through biblical typology, Catholic theology, and salvation history. 🇻🇦

Massachusetts
📢 Attention Christians of X! I’m thinking about launching a live Bible study series — If interested, fill out the quick Google Form attached. Takes 60 seconds Would love to get this going! 👇 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
7
114
The Catholic Steel Man retweeted
If anything the “Beareans” disproves Sola Scriptura & affirms the requirement of Authoritative teaching/Magisterial guidance as with Philip & the Eunuch also in Acts….
Replying to @MrCasey62
It basically affirms the Catholic approach - which is that Oral Teachings of the Apostolic Tradition cannot conflict with Scripture but do not need to be directly found in Scripture - see Road to Emmaus - Christ revealed New teaching that could only be found in OT after Oral guidance - not prior…..
3
3
15
358
The Catholic Steel Man retweeted
Interested in the Portuguese King who saw a vision of Christ? Listen to me, Prof. Nogueira (aka The Catholic Steel Man) below 👇 nitter.net/i/spaces/1pKkOXLonZoKj
2
5
146
Is the Catholic Church foretold in Genesis? Adam’s side. Christ’s side. The Bride. The Church. Sure seems like it! The biblical connections are far deeper than they first appear. Thanks again @Burgess7281975 Watch here 👇 #Catholic #CatholicChurch #CatholicFaith #CatholicTikTok #Genesis #Bible #BibleStudy #Scripture #BiblicalTypology #CatholicTheology #OldTestament #Faith #JesusChrist #SalvationHistory
7
4
21
469
0:00 Was the Church Foreshadowed in Adam’s Side? 2:55 Why Adam & Eve Typology Matters 6:35 What Is Biblical Typology? 13:51 Adam as a Type of Christ — Romans 5 15:25 Genesis 2: Adam’s “Side” & the Creation of Eve 20:59 John 19: The Church Born from Christ’s Side 24:58 Calvary, the Eucharist & the Sacrifice of the Mass 28:04 Adam’s Skull at Golgotha 33:45 Did Satan Understand Christ’s Plan? 41:00 Why the Fulfillment Must Be Greater Than the Type 45:05 Ephesians 5: Christ & His Bride 50:30 Adam & Eve, Marriage & the Mystery of the Church 54:42 Is the Church Visible? — 1 Timothy 3:15 57:09 Does This Typology Point to the Catholic Church? 1:03:07 One Kingdom, One High Priest, One Church 1:04:07 Final Thoughts: The Profile of Christ’s Bride
68
Faith, Kings & Empires w/ Prof. Nogueira (The King Who Saw Christ) nitter.net/i/spaces/1pKkOXLonZoKj
1
5
127
Sources for my Lecture Frei António Brandão, Crónica de D. Afonso Henriques. Porto: Livraria Civilização Editora, 1945. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Ourique” britannica.com/topic/Battle-… Brigham Young University Humanities Center, “Origin Story” humanitiescenter.byu.edu/ori… Hispania Sacra / CSIC hispaniasacra.revistas.csic.… University of Queensland eSpace espace.library.uq.edu.au/vie… Alexandre Herculano, História de Portugal
42
The way people like @needGod_net use Scripture is deeply problematic. Your interpretation is NOT a universal Truth. Watch my response below 👇
Ryan’s go-to move has always been to keep the argument strictly on Scripture, where his own interpretation becomes the controlling authority. But asserting an interpretation DOES NOT establish it. If his reading were the obvious Christian understanding of Scripture, we should expect to find it in the historic Church. St. Ephrem (Nisibene Hymns 27:8), St. Augustine (De natura et gratia 36.42), and even Luther all agreed. So even if we grant Ryan his "inference" (which is massively incorrect but for the sake of argument) we are still left with this fact: for more than 1,800 years, no major Christian thinker interpreted the text the way he does.
9
12
79
4,189
Due to his strong personal convictions, Yeshua Cat wishes to stress that this meme in no way endorses a belief in the occult. @yeshuacat70mb @Brosephos
1
11
203
I’ve seen worse…. Have you ever been to a Republican or Trump Rally? - People cheering and listening to every word he says (even though much of what he says contradicts Christ) - Singing and chanting the YMCA while your golden calf parades on stage
Catholics: Remember kids it’s ALL about Jesus. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
8
45
6,419
Fitting that he has a picture of a cat (because he is acting like a 🐈‍⬛) as he denies doing a debate with me. QP two of my comments today and we disagree then when I say we can have a fair moderated debate on a show that is well respected he backs out.
Yeah… cause I totally believe you would speak in fairness… especially as you want me to have the debate on a Catholic show. Especially as debates really don’t do anything to expose truth. But are used to farm clips for people to say “you owned him.”
3
6
557
The Catholic Steel Man retweeted
Ryan’s go-to move has always been to keep the argument strictly on Scripture, where his own interpretation becomes the controlling authority. But asserting an interpretation DOES NOT establish it. If his reading were the obvious Christian understanding of Scripture, we should expect to find it in the historic Church. St. Ephrem (Nisibene Hymns 27:8), St. Augustine (De natura et gratia 36.42), and even Luther all agreed. So even if we grant Ryan his "inference" (which is massively incorrect but for the sake of argument) we are still left with this fact: for more than 1,800 years, no major Christian thinker interpreted the text the way he does.
I asked this Catholic: If you simply read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, would you come away believing that Mary was sinlessly perfect? This is what he said.
53
20
268
20,447
Aaaaaaaaaaaaand Where is the author of Hebrews, Clement, and Hermas in this picture?
Catholics asking “Who wrote your Bible?” will never not be funny.
4
18
1,008
The Catholic Steel Man retweeted
Here’s the final episode of our 7 part series on 1 Clement. We end by taking about Clement’s Catholic worldview. Give it a listen.
NEW episode of On the Journey! @mattswaim, Ken Hensley, and @KennyBurchard conclude their series on St. Clement of Rome, and what he tells us about the Early Church: piped.video/watch?v=BGfNgoN2…
1
7
21
804
Been going back and forth with @mikeproverbs10 which I am happy to do. Now, I am a father, husband, theology teacher, catechist, adjunct History professor so I am vey very busy. I offer to have @Sacramentshow host a scheduled debate that is moderated and fair and he just dodges and wants to continue arguing here and then says I am "running away". No, YOU are clearly running away. You are just not an honest man and I am sorry that you feel this way.
no but I'm here now why are you running away
5
1
14
602
The Catholic Steel Man retweeted
Before we get to St. Joseph as a model of Christian fatherhood, I feel we should first consider the Patriarch Joseph. While primarily a type of Christ, Joseph from Genesis also gives us a biblical pattern that helps us understand St. Joseph. He is betrayed, sold into slavery, falsely accused of a grave crime. And yet he never allows suffering to excuse unfaithfulness, bitterness, or vice. He remains chaste, humble, responsible, and faithful. Been thinking a lot about both Josephs lately. Curious what you think, @riecker.
1
3
145
Repenting and trusting? Sounds like works to me.
If your religion requires your good works to get you into Heaven, it is false. Only repenting and trusting in the finished work of Jesus will get you to Heaven.
10
3
48
1,302
Bible Believing Christians? Which ones: the ones who believe you can’t lose salvation or the ones who say you can? The ones who say baptism saves or the ones who say it doesn’t? It’s so tough to choose because they all admit that their interpretation doesn’t lead them to err and yet have such vastly different views on Salvation.
Do the Roman Catholics who debate bible believing Christians, know they have zero authority to understand or to interpret scripture?
9
3
56
1,596