ExecDirector @_innercompass | well paired w/ @lauradelano | depsychiatrizationist l verstehenmaxxing

New England
My ADHD/stimulant story, as told to Ethan Brooks for @TheAtlantic, for a podcast feature called Scripts—about the pills we take for our brains, and the stories we tell ourselves about them YouTube: piped.video/B1GnowLnpdc?si=sva0… podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
1
9
61
30,360
CAN SSRI/SNRI withdrawal be WORSE than heroin/opioid WD? Is yr opinion from direct, personal experience? X limits poll choice to 4 so if you’ve w/d from BOTH, plz vote via replies (& btw if you were only on drug LESS than 90 days and WD was mild, this poll isn’t rly for u bb)
30% Yes, but no direct WD exp
0% No, but no direct WD exp.
60% Yes-I w/d from SSRI/SNRI
10% No-I have w/d from opioid
10 votes • 3 days
1
1
2
68
Of all the many, many, many critiques that can be made of things Sec. Kennedy has said, his comparison of coming off serotonin-modulating drugs to coming off heroin has been one of the MOST activating for many people on all sides of the discourse I think it’s notable that many of those people who feel strongly aligned with him on this issue tend to have more direct personal experience with opioid/SSRI/SNRI withdrawal, while its generally those WITHOUT as much direct personal experience who are more comfortable laughing at the notion (or, in many cases, seizing on THIS particular opinion as if it’s PROOF of his overall ignorance/lunacy)
I don't agree with everything RFK Jr says but I think the mainstream media owe him an apology on this account. I have had many patients say that they found coming off antidepressants harder than coming off heroin. And now there is large-scale data to back up those anecdotes. This of course is distinct from addiction. The pre-requisite for withdrawal is physical dependence which is a predictable physiological response that is the consequence of adaptation to a drug. Physical dependence does not involve compulsion, craving, etc. Opioids cause addiction because of their reinforcing euphoria which antidepressants do not do. But they are both cause physical dependence and evidently comparable levels of withdrawal for the higher risk antidepressants.
3
120
wow that's crazy man
Crazy, unexpected science news today: the brain is actually 2 colocated but independent organs that develop from 2 totally separate progenitor cells in early development. Big implications for some research areas (eg ALS) & for creating ethical brainless clones for transplant.
48
434
3,788
129,977
Can anyone point me to something I saw recently claiming that the two halves of the brain develop as seperate organs entirely?
2
2
284
Cooper Davis retweeted
Btw this is why I love @_innercompass because, as I see it, they provide a platform and map for sharing your story in a way that confers structural power for you. Not strips you of it. @Cooperdavis @LauraDelano
2
7
162
Watch out y’all I’m Back on my Lee J. Ames sh*t Except now I’m in my mid 40’s and can afford nice Japanese pens
1
6
257
Cooper Davis retweeted
One of the stranger surviving books of Renaissance geometry. An unknown 16th century artist made 36 sheets of colored perspective studies, then populated them with birds, animals and other tiny figures. There is no text explaining what any of it means.
20
332
2,069
32,152
Cooper Davis retweeted
This conversation in the NYT shows that the conversation on SSRI use is moving away from merely smearing critics towards more constructive engagement. Yet it still sidestepped a lot of the substance of critiques. The most shocking part was where Dr Rostain casually admitted that he didn't know whether one of his patients tapering off SSRIs after long term use was suffering from withdrawal or relapsing. How is it acceptable that after 40 years on the market an expert in the field doesn't know how to recognise SSRI withdrawal? Wouldn't it have been a good idea to establish this before 1 in 6 Americans were put on these drugs?
7
26
93
4,021
Feeling a bit “off.” Think I’ll chat with a bookish schoolmarm to obtain pills that change my brain in ways that can’t be observed or fully understood, leaving me with side effects that will be misinterpreted as underlying illness and years of labyrinthian psychological agony, where previously-straightforward emotions become looming and kaleidoscopic. After that I will get Jersey Mike’s.
5
343
Spoiler alert: NO unlimited choices are available. We just need to talk to each other with more care, more skill, and more faith. come see me and @awaisaftab talk about them in real life this coming January 26-28 in Boston conference.theinnercompass.o…
When It Comes to SSRIs, Are Our Only Choices “Safe & Effective” or “More Dangerous Than Heroin”? My New York Times op-ed and bonus content psychiatrymargins.com/p/when…
3
13
693
I'm glad to see @nytimes continue to engage the issues of overprescribing, overmedicalization and drug harm seriously. Their coverage is getting more constructive. I AM, however, a little perplexed: Why is the portion of the MAHA Report that establishes the prevalence and severity of harms to public health being called an "attack"? It reminds me of a recent @MensHealthMag headline about "The War on Antidepressants." Framing this vital public health discussion in violent terms is, at best, inappropriate. At worst, it is manipulative, harmful and inflammatory. Do you care about tackling these thorny, sensitive and incredibly serious issues? Not just SSRIs, but the future of mental health more broadly? Please consider joining us in Boston, Jan 26th–28th, for the next @innercompass conference. Tickets sold out fast last year. We've doubled both the size and the duration, and we still expect more demand. Consider grabbing "early bird" 🐦‍⬛ pricing while it's still available. (As always, if cost is an obstacle, reach out directly for community member pricing and accessibility options.) conference.theinnercompass.o…
"Bedard: You mentioned the MAHA report. So that was, for folks who may not know, earlier this year. There was a report that came out about the use, the potential overuse, of psychiatric medications, and then specifically around the challenges around deprescribing and concerns about prolonged withdrawal that actually ends up making people feel worse than whatever their initial reasons for going on the meds were. In response to that, I think for the first time, the American Psychiatric Association got together and put out a statement, I think, about deprescribing. One criticism I’ve heard that strikes me as somewhat legitimate is that that report was overdue, that thinking seriously, in public, about the challenges around deprescribing is something that we should have done before — we, in medicine, should have done before MAHA came out with its attack first. Rostain: I agree 100 percent. I mean, we had not spent enough time asking the question: Why are we giving so many meds to some of our patients? Especially in psychiatry. And one of the first things I’ve always done when people come to see me is if they’re on four or five different medications, the first thing I ask is, “What can we take you off of?” But it’s great. Even if the prompt was kind of a smack in the head, it is time to ask what medications we are prescribing. How are they working for our patients?
1
4
11
561
"Bedard: You mentioned the MAHA report. So that was, for folks who may not know, earlier this year. There was a report that came out about the use, the potential overuse, of psychiatric medications, and then specifically around the challenges around deprescribing and concerns about prolonged withdrawal that actually ends up making people feel worse than whatever their initial reasons for going on the meds were. In response to that, I think for the first time, the American Psychiatric Association got together and put out a statement, I think, about deprescribing. One criticism I’ve heard that strikes me as somewhat legitimate is that that report was overdue, that thinking seriously, in public, about the challenges around deprescribing is something that we should have done before — we, in medicine, should have done before MAHA came out with its attack first. Rostain: I agree 100 percent. I mean, we had not spent enough time asking the question: Why are we giving so many meds to some of our patients? Especially in psychiatry. And one of the first things I’ve always done when people come to see me is if they’re on four or five different medications, the first thing I ask is, “What can we take you off of?” But it’s great. Even if the prompt was kind of a smack in the head, it is time to ask what medications we are prescribing. How are they working for our patients?
2
2
5
2,031
Haha I haven’t even read the article yet but the AI art and the headline are just so funny It’s not a war folks It’s not a state of armed conflict against a particular set of pharmaceutical consumer products People are just starting to wonder if it’s a good idea for -millions of men, women and children -to take SSRIs daily -for months and years -with no plan to stop And that conversation is now happening among the broader public for the first time in many many decades That’s not a war, ya goofballs
The War On Antidepressants Has Officially Arrived menshealth.com/health/a73586…
7
21
86
5,078
Cooper Davis retweeted
We’ve taken experiences that are part of being human and turned them into symptoms to treat. It’s a cultural shift @HHSGov and @RobertKennedyJr are now speaking to directly: have we begun medicalizing problems that were never medical to begin with?
3
23
71
2,397
Cooper Davis retweeted
Taking nootropics and peptides so you can lock in and post about taking nootropics and peptides so you can afford to buy more nootropics and peptides so you can
17
21
1,014
16,997
Fielder is the most uncomfortable auteur of our most uncomfortable age
1
1
392
Big pharma is easy to hate on, but what about micro pharma?
This vial contains a new drug called PAC-3310. It was designed by ChatGPT, and I synthesized it in a chemistry lab I built in my garage. PAC-3310 is a new selective M4 muscarinic receptor agonist for treating schizophrenia - similar to the recent breakthrough drug Cobenfry, but improved. (1/7)
2
2
12
617