The US bank call reports for the June 30 quarter are now out. This is several days faster than before and with fewer late filings. What can one learn from a close reading of call reports?
1.A few banks file bank level call reports to the FDIC before they report their earnings via SEC filings. Occasionally, the earnings results are quite different than expected.
2. Press releases usually only reveal nonaccrual loans (sort of equivalent to 90+ day delinquent). Call reports are the only place that you will see loans 30-89 days past due or restructured loans. The first shows the pipeline into nonaccrual, the second shows a sneaky back door out of nonaccrual.
3.The call report is 15 days faster than the 10-Q filing in showing what loan categories are driving credit problems.
4.If the stock is not a SEC filer, like so many bank microcaps, the call report is much more granular information than you will get from a one page press release.
Since X's blue checkmark allows verbosity, I'm lowering my asset threshold at the bank level from the $1 billion to $500 million. I will still only mention banks with a 100 bps move in a loan quality category. To underline how significant a move that is, neither
$CCB -44% on Thursday or
$GBFH -30% the same day exceeded that level!
Three publicly traded banks had multiple levels of deterioration:
$BANC had losses up 233 bps annualized across multiple categories, yet still had nonaccruals up 108 bps, mostly due to construction deterioration. So, the kitchen sink was not thrown out.
$NEWT had losses up 320 bps and 30-89 days delinquent loans up 305 bps. The fruits of doubling the loans in the last 12 months are still ripening.
$NEWT has not yet reported quarterly earnings.
$CASH had 30-89 days delinquent loans up 180 bps and nonaccruals up 320 bps. This may be seasonal, but it wasn't this seasonal last year.
There's a special category for
$IBOC. It has 5 bank subsidiaries: two have minor issues in early delinquencies and two others have massive C&I nonaccruals. The total for the banks shows net income up slightly over 1Q while nonaccruals are up 79%.
$IBOC has not yet reported quarterly earnings.
These 7 banks had significant deterioration in loans 30-89 days past due. This is a category with a lot of false alarms, so it can mean everything or nothing.
$DENI has some issues in owner-occupied commercial real estate (CRE)
$MVLY has issues with investor CRE
$MPCB has problems with C&I
$ORPB has a bad construction loan - can't remember any problem there before
$QNTO has problems across many categories. Can't remember when they didn't have problems.
$TYBT, a darling for some, has C&I issues.
$USMT has both C&I and owner-occupied CRE problems.
Loss content is usually highest in construction and C&I problems.
There's a loophole that allows banks to keep 90+ day delinquent loans off nonaccrual if they're super confident in collecting. Nobody is overusing that loophole as it has been replaced by the restructuring loophole.
The restructuring loophole was heavily used by
$EFSG, a small western PA bank, for weak CRE loans.
Before we get to the nonaccrual loans, a bit about their relationship to loan losses. Essentially, consumer loans seldom reach nonaccruals, they are contractually written off as losses after a certain number of days (90, 120 or 180). Commercial nonaccruals drive future commercial loan losses and commercial losses are much more volatile than consumer losses. As since the stock market really dislikes volatile losses, we pay disproportionate attention to nonaccruals. The corollary is that commercial losses reduce the pool of nonaccruals, so taking a loss and watching nonaccruals fall is OK while taking a loss and watching nonaccrual rise is really bad.
$BSBK had a 200+ bp jump in nonaccruals due to investor CRE
$CZWI had nonaccruals up 100 bps on investor CRE despite somewhat higher losses. They have attracted an activist.
$CNBB had nonaccruals up 110 bps on owner-occupied CRE. Losses are minimal.
$EGBN took big writedowns and saw nonaccruals drop commensurately
$FINW has had consumer losses surging 4 quarters in a row, but the margin is surging too, so it's likely a mix shift. I don't know them.
$DE had a $60 million jump in loan losses at its bank sub. Delinquencies plummeted. I bought lots of parts for my equipment.
$MRBK had nonaccruals rise 100+ bps in construction lending. It's a mystery how they have problems in their booming region.
$MCB had losses up $120 bps on multifamily (thanks Mayor Mamdani) and C&I. Nonaccruals only fell a third of what they should have
$NODB had nonaccruals rise 150 bps on a owner-occupied CRE loan (or two)
$OSBK had nonaccruals rise 160 bps on investor CRE.
$PBNK had a 4.00% loss rate due to C&I, the nonaccruals fell commensurately
the bank sub of Pitney Bowes
$PBI had somewhat higher loan losses
$SOUB had 8% losses and finally (?) cleared its backlog of problems.
$SSBI had 4% losses and did the same.
$XYZ's Square sub had losses up 280 bps from 1Q
Finally, Korea's Woori Bank had a significant jump in nonaccruals as a CRE loan went bad.