500+ AI creators. One powerful network. 🌍 What if your next AI campaign could reach the right creators, the right audiences, and multiple communities — without chasing creators one by one? That’s what we’re building at CreatorFlow. 🧵

STOP telling ChatGPT “edit my photo.” That’s why the results look fake and overdone. Use these instead:

Made with Seedance 2.5 Prompt: VIDEO CONCEPT: Create a 30-second ultra-realistic personal video of a young woman visiting a tiny late-night tattoo studio with her friend. She is not getting a tattoo. Instead, she is helping the artist choose between two tiny temporary flower designs, then testing one on her wrist. The video captures the nervous laughter, close-up details, and her genuine reaction when she sees it. The entire scene should feel intimate and spontaneous. FORMAT: 30 seconds • 16:9 • 1080p • photorealistic live-action • raw handheld consumer-camera footage MAIN CHARACTER A young Korean woman in her early 20s with long straight dark-brown hair. She wears a loose black zip-up jacket, faded blue jeans, simple white sneakers, and a small silver ring on her right hand. Keep her face, hairstyle, outfit, ring, body proportions, and identity completely consistent. LOCATION A tiny independent tattoo studio in Seoul, South Korea, around 11:30 PM. The studio is located above a quiet street and has: - Warm desk lamps - A small tattoo chair - Wooden work table - Framed original artwork - Ink bottles - Paper sketches - Small plants - Metal shelves - Concrete walls - One large window overlooking the quiet street No recognizable tattoo artists, brands, logos, or copyrighted artwork. CAMERA / VISUAL STYLE The video is recorded by her friend on a small consumer digital camera. - Handheld - Slight natural shake - Close imperfect framing - Autofocus occasionally shifts between her face and the temporary tattoo - Warm indoor exposure - Slight digital noise - Natural skin texture - Mild motion blur - No stabilization - No artificial bokeh - No commercial beauty lighting TIMELINE 0–5 SECONDS — THE DESIGNS The camera enters the studio. The woman sits at a small table looking at two tiny flower sketches. She looks between them. She points at one. “This one?” The artist nods. She looks toward the camera. “Or this one?” --- 5–10 SECONDS — TESTING IT The artist prepares a small temporary tattoo transfer. The woman holds out her wrist. The camera moves closer. She watches carefully. She looks slightly nervous but amused. --- 10–16 SECONDS — APPLICATION The temporary flower design is pressed onto her wrist. She keeps her arm completely still. The camera focuses on the artist's hands. The paper is carefully peeled away. The small flower design is revealed. --- 16–21 SECONDS — FIRST LOOK She rotates her wrist toward herself. Her expression changes into a genuine smile. She looks at the camera. “Wait… I actually like it.” She turns her wrist under the light. --- 21–26 SECONDS — CLOSE-UP The camera moves very close to the tiny flower. The details should look physically printed on the skin rather than digitally composited. She gently touches the edge of the design. She laughs quietly. --- 26–30 SECONDS — WALKING OUT She puts her jacket back on. The camera follows her toward the studio door. Before leaving, she raises her wrist toward the camera one more time. She says: “Maybe I'll get the real one someday.” She laughs. The door closes. End. AUDIO Natural studio ambience only: - Quiet conversation - Paper movement - Small table sounds - Clothing movement - Door sounds - Distant nighttime traffic - Soft room tone - Natural laughter NO BACKGROUND MUSIC. REALISM / PHYSICS The temporary tattoo must conform naturally to the shape and texture of her wrist. Skin should stretch subtly when she moves her hand. The transfer paper must behave like real thin paper. Hands and fingers must interact naturally. Lighting reflections must remain consistent across skin and objects. No digital-looking tattoo edges. NEGATIVE PROMPT CGI, 3D render, plastic skin, beauty filter, artificial face, face morphing, identity drift, extra fingers, malformed hands, duplicated people, floating tattoo, digitally pasted tattoo, unrealistic skin texture, impossible reflections, excessive HDR, oversaturation, artificial bokeh, cinematic commercial lighting, perfect stabilization, exaggerated acting, subtitles, captions, logos, watermarks, recognizable brands, copyrighted artwork, wardrobe changes, hairstyle changes, continuity errors, background music. FINAL LOOK Make it feel like a friend casually filmed a late-night decision that wasn't supposed to become a video. Keep the imperfect camera movement, natural pauses, quiet laughter, autofocus mistakes, ordinary studio clutter, and realistic skin detail. Nothing should feel staged or overly cinematic. Personal, spontaneous, slightly messy, and believable.

Apple sold you an iPhone with its top camera settings switched off. On purpose. $1,200 for a camera you've never actually used. Six settings are off by default, and they're the ones that can make your photos look dramatically better. Fix these 6:

You can read about refraction 10 times, but seeing light actually bend is what makes it click. In Gauth Academy, Infinite Mode turns the concept into a 3D visual explanation you can follow as the light moves between different materials. Feels much closer to understanding the idea than memorizing the definition. Explore Gauth Academy at gauth.com/course

I’ve used noise-cancelling headphones for years without really understanding what they were doing. Watching ANC visualized as opposing sound waves makes the whole thing instantly obvious. Gauth Academy’s Infinite Mode is really good at this kind of concept—taking something invisible and making it understandable through 3D visuals. Check out Infinite Mode at gauth.com/course

This film cost $29,575 and took 10 days to make. AI ≠ Cheap Our Nexus feature will still cost millions next year. But it'll look like a $200M film. I have a Claude skill you can copy that makes this easy. Full process and Dreamina prompts below👇🏼🧵

Wrote it yourself, but AI detectors still flagged it? 😳 Let Walter make your writing sound unmistakably YOU! @walterwrites_ai trywalterai.com/ai-humanizer…?…

Have you heard of this novel? It’s the “literary back-to-school phenomenon.” It’s the winner of the Prix Fnac, the Prix Méduse, the Prix Première Plume, strongly tipped for the Prix Renaudot, and it’s in the running for the Prix Goncourt, Femina, Médicis, and Décembre. Oh yes, it’s also in the process of being translated into 20 languages. Well, according to Pangram, this novel was written almost entirely by an Artificial Intelligence. We tested several passages, at various points in the manuscript, and got almost always the same result: 100% AI (see the first two chapters in the tweet below). Let’s recall that Pangram is by far the most reliable AI detector: its false positive rate is 0.0041%, or about one human text out of 24,400. Out of 996,273 texts prior to 2022, Pangram classifies only 14 (0.0014%) as partially written by AI. The probability that twenty passages from the same book (and there are far more than 20 flagged sections in the novel) are misidentified by Pangram as being produced by an AI is therefore 0.0041% to the power of 20, or 0.1802 × 10⁻⁸⁵ %, which is 0 followed by 85 zeros after the decimal point. Wouldn’t it have been more honest for the author to credit their co-author?

I produce audiobooks for a few indie authors. Using the free v4 to send them some samples has been a big unlock.

Made with @claudeai Opus 5.5

Tavus gave me early access to Griffin, and this genuinely feels different from talking to a chatbot. It sees you, reacts in real time, and can even interrupt you mid-conversation. Face-to-face AI is getting very real, very fast. Congrats @tavus and @hassaanraza tavus.io/griffin

❌ iPhones that AREN'T WORTH A DAMN: ・iPhone 16e ・iPhone Air ・iPhone 17 Pro ・iPhone 14 Pro ・iPhone 17 Pro Max ✅ iPhones you SHOULD buy ↓

OpenAI devoted an entire keynote speech to discussing a team of agents, whereas Teamily simply released their February financial statements without much fanfare.

Ling-3.1-flash just showed what happens when an AI model is tested outside the chat window. Compiler development. Rust optimization. Pyright. Three.js. Agent workflows. Healthcare reasoning. 560B total parameters. 25B active/token. 1M-token context. If the open-source release matches these results, developers will have a lot to explore.

Inworld provided the voice models and serving infrastructure, while Ultravox handled the agent side. It seemed like a fairly obvious synergy, to be honest.

I just open sourced the resilia's song ad skill that does it all for you Resilia runs 3000 ads and their winning format is the long drama song ads sometimes 7-10 minutes long - I built a skill that does it all, creates a perfect script with a hero's journey - Creates the song for you - Create the timing map - Creates the shot sheets - Creates the videos - Edit it all together Arcads & Higgsfield wants you to pay thousands of dollars for their agent to do what your claude can do for free I initially released it inside Maxfusion MCP but after great demand and huge success I now give it to everyone for FREE. Comment SONG and I'll DM you the full skill instantly

We're releasing HeyGen Video, built for businesses that need production-quality video without production-level costs. Pricing starts at $0.01/s through October (50% off) Built on @Minimax_AI H3, post-trained by HeyGen. Learn more: developers.heygen.com/heygen…

switching from what i use now would depend on one thing: how reliable is it across back to back attempts? does each new take look roughly the same quality or does it vary a lot between runs?

What makes Vivix A1 interesting is that the character isn’t just talking back. It can move through the scene, react to what’s around it, and keep listening while you interrupt or redirect the interaction. That’s a much more interesting direction for real time AI characters than another fixed talking avatar. @VivixLabs_HQ