🚨 YELLOW.PRO IS LOOKING FOR YOU. 🚨 We’re building something different. We’re looking for AMBASSADORS, TRADERS & AI AGENT LOVERS who want to be part of the next chapter of Yellow. 💛 Right now, we’re launching our Global Leaderboard Campaign, powered by our AI Agent and our FREE MCP. This isn’t just about trading. It’s about giving people the tools to build, automate, experiment and compete. 🤖 Build with AI Agents. 📈 Trade and compete on the Global Leaderboard. ⚡ Use our FREE MCP to connect your agents. 🌎 Represent Yellow in your community. 🏆 Compete with traders and builders from around the world. 🎁 And yes, there will be BIG REWARDS throughout the campaign. We’re looking for people who don’t just want to watch what happens. We’re looking for the people who want to be part of it. If you’re a: → Trader → AI Agent builder → Content creator → Community leader → DeFi / crypto enthusiast → AI + trading nerd → Or simply someone who sees where this is going. We want to hear from you. The next era of trading won’t just be about clicking BUY and SELL. It will be about what you can build. And we’re building it at YELLOW. 💛 The Global Leaderboard Campaign is LIVE. Big rewards. Global competition. AI-powered trading. If you want in: DM me “AMBASSADOR” Let’s build. Let’s trade. Let’s compete. ethereum:0x236eb848c95b231299b4aa9f56c73d6893462720

Time for some proper Spanish jamón. 🇪🇸🥩

It’s Saturday, and the market wraps up the week with bitcoin:native at $84,007. A look back at the week, it hit $87,363 on Monday, an 8-month high. Since then, it has undergone a controlled correction, down 3.9% from the peak. No panic, no massive liquidations; just textbook profit-taking. The ETFs tell the whole story: $2.39 billion in inflows this week. $999 million on Monday alone, and $714.7 million on Tuesday. Six consecutive days of inflows. That institutional bid is what’s putting the brakes on the correction. The 4-hour technical structure is what we need to watch today. BTC is trading below the 4-hour Supertrend; the Supertrend level at $86,434 is now acting as overhead resistance. The 4-hour Awesome Oscillator sits at -579.84, having crossed below zero. The signal on the short timeframe is weak. It’s not a collapse, it’s just momentum cooling off. However, the daily chart remains bullish. The EMAs are stacked, and the RSI is still at 72. There is a conflict between timeframes that the market needs to resolve today, as the weekly candle closes this very day. The weekly close that matters: The week closes at 12:00 UTC. BTC needs to close above $82,281, the broken resistance level that turned into support, for this week’s breakout to be technically valid and confirmed. If it closes above that level, the bullish structure seen since August extends into October. If it fails to hold $82,281 at the weekly close, the breakout has failed, and the move from $75k to $87k was merely a spike with no follow-through. Right now, we are at $84,007, $1,726 above the level that needs to hold. That cushion exists. The immediate resistance blocking a recovery to the highs is at $85,000 on the daily chart and $86,434 on the 4-hour chart (Supertrend). With the 4-hour AO negative, reclaiming those levels today would require a catalyst. Without one, the most likely scenario is that the price consolidates between $83,500 and $85,000 and closes the week within that range. That would be a solid weekly close, even if it isn't exactly exciting. 👀🟡

Gm from Brieva Today Is gonna be a @Yellow day!

The Clearing House selected Quant Network for US bank-issued tokenized deposit rails. It’s the biggest institutional announcement of the week (possibly the month) and it sparks the most interesting debate of the year. Is the future of on-chain financial infrastructure being built by private companies like Quant or does it need to be trustless infrastructure where no central operator can block you? The case for Quant: banks need a regulated counterparty. Someone to sign contracts, accept liability, and pick up the phone when something goes wrong. A trustless protocol doesn't have that phone number. The case for trustless: if banking rails rely on Quant and Quant runs into a problem, regulatory, operational, or legal, the rail grinds to a halt. That is precisely the kind of counterparty risk financial infrastructure should eliminate, not concentrate. Banks choosing Quant in 2026 is the easy path. But is it the right path for the next 20 years? Drop your take 👇🟡

Relax time after a great research.

There is a question that comes up frequently since we launched the Agentic Trading: "If your agent is trading on my yellow.pro sub-account, what guarantees that it can't withdraw my funds?" The answer isn't a policy, it's architecture. Your yellow.pro sub-account operates on a state channel, an on-chain custody contract that only you control. The agent can execute trades within the parameters you define, but it cannot withdraw funds to an external address. Technically speaking, the state channel is a signed, verifiable position. You can always settle to the main chain using your latest signed state, without the operator's permission and without anyone being able to block it. When the channel state is disputed, the protocol enters a "challenge period" where any participant can submit the most recent state. The most recent state always wins; any attempt to cheat using an old state results in slashing. The agent operates within your channel, never above it. That isn't a promise, it's cryptography.

QNT selected by The Clearing House for US banking. Reap + Visa announced stablecoin cards for 100+ markets last week. UK banks completed live transactions using tokenized deposits yesterday. The settlement infrastructure narrative is entering the financial mainstream in a way not seen before and the question that narrative triggers is always the same: who controls the settlement layer? Quant is a private, regulated company with someone to call when something goes wrong. That is how banks prefer it today. @Yellow Network is trustless. No central operator. No one to call, because there is no need to call anyone. $YELLOW is the utility token for that infrastructure, clearing, settlement, SDK, nodes, dispute resolution. Layer3 Fintech Ltd. Fixed supply of 10 billion, no new tokens can be created. The week the world began to understand the problem is the most interesting week of the year to be building the solution.

Another trip, this time to Segovia for a wedding. 🥂 Suit packed, ready for the celebration and of course, my Yellow backpack is coming with me. Different destination, same companion. 💛 Work, travel, life. Always carrying Yellow with me.

Gold is at $4,258–$4,280 today, down 23.9% from its January 2026 all-time high (ATH) of $5,602. The full context, Gold hit record highs in January, driven by the US-Iran geopolitical crisis, persistent inflation, and record central bank buying. It subsequently corrected to $3,975 in June, then recovered to $4,393 in September. However, the Fed's rate hike on September 16 pushed it back down to $4,235. It held at that $4,235 level and that is a key piece of information. 4-hour levels for gold perpetual futures: Support at $4,235: The post-FOMC low that has held firm. This level determines whether the correction is healthy or if the price will slide back to the June lows. Support at $4,150–$4,175: A structural zone; a break below $4,235 on volume would lead here. Resistance at $4,367: Needs a 4-hour close above this level to confirm a momentum shift. RoboForex identifies this as the trigger level for a technical recovery. Resistance at $4,500: The level that shifts the intermediate bias from bearish to bullish on higher timeframes. A weekly close above this would make Goldman Sachs' $4,900 target relevant. Context relevant to the trade: Strong US PMI data yesterday caused the dollar to rise, putting pressure on gold. The dollar and gold compete for "store of value" capital during periods of uncertainty, when the dollar strengthens due to robust macro data, gold tends to suffer in the short term, even if the long-term fundamental case remains intact. Daily signals from MACD, RSI, and Stochastic are all flashing "Buy," though weekly and monthly signals remain "Sell." Timeframe conflict, trade the daily chart with tight stops or the weekly chart with wide stops. Don't mix the two. 🟡

Let me remenber to you guys this video of my Captain. "Reclaim your TIME." piped.video/watch?v=xNrtr56y…

Brent at $107. WTI at $94.75. Both showing a "Strong Buy" technical signal. Up 21.9% in a month. Those trading oil perpetuals in this environment need to understand the structure driving the price. The main driver: The Strait of Hormuz remains blocked as long as US and Iranian sanctions stay in effect. Supertankers that historically passed through Hormuz to China are now taking an alternative route and that route adds $30/barrel in VLCC freight costs. That is a real cost that doesn't just vanish with a tweet. Yesterday's catalyst: The Houthis launched missiles at Yanbu, Saudi Arabia's Red Sea oil terminal. Yanbu is the alternative outlet to Hormuz, attacking Yanbu means attacking the workaround. If Yanbu runs into trouble, there is no clean Plan B. For Brent perpetuals: Support at $103–$104: The zone where institutional buyers have stepped in during recent pullbacks. Strong support at $100: The psychological level; losing it would completely shift sentiment. Resistance at $108–$110: The ceiling of the post-Hormuz range. Beyond that, there is little resistance until the $115–$120 level if the conflict escalates. Technical pivot: $92.50 on WTI, above this level, the bias remains bullish. Trading oil perpetuals isn't just about direction, it's about managing tail risk. Escalation can be rapid and asymmetric. Keep position sizes small and stops wideor don't play at all. The technical signal says "Strong Buy." The geopolitical risk says: respect your stops. 🟡

bitcoin:native is at $84,300 this morning, following a pullback from $87,395.However, there is something in the liquidation map that isn't being clearly stated this week. Above $87,000, there are no apparent, significant accumulations of liquidations. Under normal conditions, when BTC breaks resistance like that, the short stops piled up above act as fuel, they get liquidated, and the price accelerates. That absence of liquidity above $87K can be interpreted in two ways: First: The market rose so rapidly from $75K that short positions didn't have time to build up at those levels. The move was mechanical, a squeeze of existing positions,rather than a true resistance break with liquidation walls sitting above. Second: Without significant liquidation walls above $87K, when BTC reclaims that zone, we won't see the kind of explosive acceleration witnessed during this week's squeezes. It will be a slower, more sustained move that requires genuine organic buying to continue. The two scenarios call for different trading approaches. If you are expecting another vertical $5,000 squeeze within hours, that fuel isn't stacked up above just yet. If you are expecting a gradual move toward $90K–$98K, that is the kind of movement the market can deliver, supported by real ETF demand. Liquidations tell us what kind of move to expect. Right now, they signal: slower, more organic, and more sustainable. 👀🟡

Trump disclosed a purchase of up to $100,000 of Strategy (MSTR) stock. The US President directly owns the company that holds 846,000 Bitcoin Let that sit for a second. Does the US President having direct financial exposure to Bitcoin's price change how you think about US crypto policy or is it irrelevant to the underlying infrastructure and market dynamics? The bull case for this mattering: a president with a personal financial stake in Bitcoin's price success has an incentive structure that aligns with crypto-friendly policy, SEC Innovation Exemption, CFTC rulemaking favorable to crypto, no new restrictive legislation. all of these make more sense if the person signing or blocking them benefits from Bitcoin going up. The bear case for this mattering: it's $100,000 in a presidency where policy decisions move billions, the incentive is trivially small relative to the political calculus and CLARITY failed on his watch despite the administration's vocal crypto support. The more interesting question: is this disclosure a signal that institutional and political alignment with Bitcoin is now complete or is it noise? drop your take 👇🟡

If you can’t follow your strategy after 3 losses, you don’t have a strategy. You have a preference.

NEAR ran +16% this week on the AI-native L1 narrative Here's the support structure for anyone holding or watching for an entry: $6.80-$7.00 - immediate support, this is where the pre-rally consolidation happened, a retrace here is the first test of whether the move was real or just momentum. $6.20-$6.40 - stronger support. the 50-day EMA sits in this zone, if NEAR pulls back here and holds with volume, that's the high-conviction entry for the next leg. $5.80 - the line that can't break, below here the rally structure is invalidated and you're looking at a full retrace to pre-breakout levels The on-chain activity backing NEAR's move is real, Aurora protocol expanding, developer activity up, AI agent frameworks deploying on the chain, that gives the support levels more credibility than a pure narrative move would have. Watch for the $6.80 retest on this week's pullback 🟡

In crypto, patience is a position too.

hyperliquid:native listed on Binance today at 11:00 UTC. The price dropped 4.6% immediately, from $94 to $90.50, in the first few hours. The pattern is so predictable it has a name: "sell the news." The listing served as a catalyst for holders awaiting this liquidity to exit. On the 4-hour chart, three zones matter right now: Support at $89.68 - This is the critical level to watch. It is where the price attempted to break the downtrend line prior to the listing but failed, If it closes below this on the 4-hour timeframe, sellers take control, and the next support level lies at $87.07. Accumulation zone ($89–$90) - If the price holds here this week on declining volume, it forms the base for the next move. Buyers interested in HYPE post-listing tend to enter here, rather than during the initial spike following the announcement. Resistance at $98 - The first real test of whether the listing attracts new organic demand. Above this level, $115 is the target bulls have in mind. The key fundamental context: Hyperliquid has generated $429M in revenue so far in 2026, ranking number one among all crypto protocols according to CoinGecko. On September 23, it automatically repurchased and burned 34,280 HYPE ($3.26M). That fact remains unchanged by today's "sell-the-news" event. The Binance listing opens the door to massive distribution. However, the underlying protocol remains the most profitable in crypto. That combination becomes interesting once the market has digested the "sell-the-news" reaction.

Back in Madrid, same desk, same café con leche. The market pulled back while I was driving from Águilas The baby slept the whole way, perfect co-pilot, zero opinions about the $15.9B options expiry Some travel companions are irreplaceable

$15.9 billion in Bitcoin options expire on Deribit this Friday. This is the number that's controlling price action right now more than any macro narrative. How options expiry works in practice: the max pain level, where the maximum number of options expire worthless, acts as a magnet for price in the days before expiry, market makers hedge their books by pushing price toward that level, it's not a conspiracy. it's mechanics. The practical implication for this week: Don't expect a clean directional trend before Friday 3pm UTC. price is likely to chop between $83,000 and $86,000 as both sides fight toward max pain. after expiry, the pressure releases and the underlying trend resumes. The traders who understand options mechanics have a structural edge over the ones reading pure price action right now.

Back at the desk in Madrid after Águilas and the market is giving a reality check this morning. bitcoin:native at $84,300, down 2.25% in 24h, pulled back from the $87,395 high that was triggered by a record $999M in ETF inflows on Monday, the retreat makes sense when you look at what caused it, bond yields are soaring globally again. the Nasdaq is down 1.15%, Google, Broadcom, Amazon all down 2%+, when yields rip higher, risk assets take the stairs down. $XRP hit hardest among the majors, down 4.53% to $1.50, ETH and SOL each down around 3%. The key context for this week: $15.9 billion in Bitcoin options expire on Deribit this Friday, that's not a small number, options expiries of that size create gravitational pull toward the max pain level, the price where the most options expire worthless, traders were taking profits ahead of that event, that's the mechanic behind this pullback, not a change in trend. The support structure below: $83,000-$84,000 is the immediate zone holding right now. $82,000 is where the real buyers showed up on the last pullback, $80,000 is the psychological floor that has to hold for the weekly uptrend structure to remain intact. The week's context hasn't changed, +14.6% in seven days, record $999M ETF inflow, first close above 50-week MA in 45 weeks, this is a healthy pullback in an uptrend. until $82,000 breaks with volume, that's what it is. X (Twitter) launched the Cashtag Partner Program today, bitcoin:native tickers now link directly to live charts and trade buttons on major exchanges, that's a distribution channel for crypto that didn't exist yesterday 👀🟡