Context over headlines. Facts over narratives. Noise gets filtered.
North West, UK
- Tweets 31,530
- Following 5,095
- Followers 2,816
- Likes 36,344
#MidtermsAreComing
Americans you know you have a duty to your forefathers.
Be the land of the brave, home of the brave and get rid of the tyrannical control over your once great nation.
Half way to getting him out. Thank you for your attention in this matter.
🇺🇸
3
1,227
Oh no. I understood perfectly. You’re confused, and apparently operating at the very zenith of your intellectual capacity, so this may require grown-up assistance.
The analogy attempts to establish that birthplace doesn’t alter ancestry. Nobody disputes that.
But you’ve confused biological species with nationality, citizenship and national identity. They’re fundamentally different concepts.
A dog cannot become a horse. A person can become a British citizen. And being born in Britain may confer citizenship, depending on the law and parental status.
The analogy doesn’t deconstruct my worldview. It exposes your inability to distinguish between concepts.
Repeating a logical fallacy until your echo chamber applauds isn’t critical thinking. It’s intellectual karaoke.
You've failed to understand the point of the question, and mistook that as the question being nonsense.
It's used a lot because it's effective at deconstructing your worldview, and people with that worldview have no good response to it.
12
8
657
No. It’s a dog.
If the stable is in England, it’s an English dog. If it’s got a British passport, it’s a British dog.
If its parents came from Germany, it’s still a dog born in England.
Provided it isn’t dangerous and is properly cared for, it’s welcome.
And that’s as far as your ridiculous analogy goes.
It didn’t arrive on a boat. It isn’t going to rape the cat, steal your job or take over your neighbourhood.
It’s a dog, mate.
Stop panicking. And stop confusing biology with nationality.
27
11
161
7,638
This isn’t debate, Bob. It’s a rehearsed ambush masquerading as intellectual superiority.
You arrive armed with practised soundbites, verbal sleight of hand and loaded questions, ready to pounce on unsuspecting members of the public.
“If a dog is born in a barn, does that make it a horse?”
That’s not critical thinking. It’s a crude analogy dressed up as an argument. We’ve seen Toms do it and all you are doing isn’t copying a known shill format.
These rhetorical tricks have been around for centuries. The only innovation is filming them, selectively editing the encounters and harvesting clicks.
You’re not educating anyone. You’re exploiting sentiment, manufacturing confrontation and mistaking an unprepared person’s hesitation for an intellectual victory.
The ability to memorise a comeback doesn’t make you clever. And humiliating strangers doesn’t make you right.
You’re not demonstrating critical thinking, Bob. You’re demonstrating how easily it can be replaced by performance.
It’s political clickbait masquerading as debate.
Lefty demands our debate stands be SHUT DOWN… then REGRETS going on camera.
The Left have ZERO critical thinking skills.
73
34
310
27,011
He’s waving at America’s hopes and dreams.
LOL - Trump stops mid helipad to wave and salute nobody.
Watch at 0:21, the camera zooms out to show.
Natalie Harp can also be seen on her way to Marine One. #TravelWithNatalie
159
You’re an MP, Rupert. Your duty is to promote calm, stability and confidence in our country.
Instead, you repeatedly stoke division, inflame tensions and flirt with the prospect of civil unrest.
You don’t seem interested in putting out fires. You stand there with a box of matches, hoping for a spark.
That’s not leadership. It’s utterly disgraceful.
403
30
150
14,682
Someone should Auto-Tune Doolan. At least his sermon might be entertaining.
Quoting scripture over Tommy Ten Names doesn’t make him righteous, Ricki. It just makes you a backing singer in the gospel choir of grifters.
Even God deserves better PR.
The nation and the Lord stands with you @TRobinsonNewEra.
“Many are the afflictions of the righteous: but the LORD delivereth him out of them all.”
Psalm 34:19
1
152
Montgomery, you’ve managed to quote the Bill of Rights while spectacularly missing its meaning.
That passage rejects papal authority over England, not foreigners living here.
And the delicious irony? The same Bill of Rights established the reign of William III, a Dutch prince who arrived with a Dutch army.
Your own historical evidence demolishes your argument.
Try reading the history, not just borrowing its words.
legislation.gov.uk/aep/Willa…
parliament.uk/about/living-h…
Our ancestors, 336 years ago, wrote into the English Bill of Rights:
"No foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."
They were right.
1
761
Stockholm syndrome? Hybristophilia? Or just good old-fashioned cult-of-personality hero worship?
You’re travelling to a courthouse like it’s a celebrity meet-and-greet.
A court appearance isn’t a badge of honour, and being someone’s number-one fan isn’t evidence of their innocence.
227
It’s a matter of common decency, isn’t it, Hurst?
Nobody suggested every Reform councillor is guilty by association. The question is whether a political party tolerates, excuses or challenges disgraceful behaviour within its ranks.
And dragging child sexual abuse into the argument as a cheap political punchline doesn’t make you clever.
It makes you part of the problem.
Accountability isn’t collective guilt. You really ought to know the difference.
Perceived hurty words by a handful of Reform councillors apparently means the whole party is like that.
I guess using this method means the Labour Party is one massive paedophile ring.
5
19
835
Alex, what an extraordinary display of intellectual arrogance.
You’re a former UKIP spin doctor, a seven-month Brexit Party MEP, a Reform adviser and a broadcaster. That’s political communications experience, not an automatic qualification to lecture the public on intelligence operations while dismissing everyone else as idiots.
And your own record warrants scrutiny.
In 2019, you called questions about Cambridge Analytica “libellous”, before Channel 4 obtained a recording contradicting your denial. You subsequently acknowledged working on Kenya’s election campaign through its parent company, SCL.
Rather awkward for someone demanding impeccable sources and professional credibility.
Then there’s Nathan Gill, your former political colleague and employer, imprisoned for accepting pro-Russian bribes. To your credit, you reportedly approached police voluntarily. Unlike your sweeping accusations here, that was a genuine, documented foreign influence operation.
So where is YOUR evidence?
Name the individuals supposedly encouraging riots. Identify their actions. Produce the intelligence linking them to this CRINK/OPEC+ conspiracy.
Nobody sensible wants Molotov cocktails on British streets. Opposing violence is not the same as demanding political silence.
You have every right to an opinion, Alex. So does everybody else.
What you don’t have is some divine authority to declare dissenters intellectually inferior.
Your entire post is an exercise in sneering condescension, unsupported accusations and theatrical self-importance.
Political spin isn’t intelligence. Name-calling isn’t expertise. And a thesaurus isn’t a substitute for evidence.
For someone so contemptuous of keyboard warriors, you’ve produced a remarkably convincing audition for the role.
European Parliament, official record:
europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/9…
Cambridge Analytica revelations:
thejournal.ie/brexit-party-m…
Nathan Gill conviction and Phillips's reported cooperation with police:
theguardian.com/politics/202…
Many on this site don't understand the first thing about the propagation of rioting in some countries in Europe.
They are armchair anarchy-mongers who mistakenly think we need destructive drama. Just because their shallow lives lack true valour and depth, we don't want molotov cocktails on our streets just to titilate these keyboard warrior wankers.
They don't know a thing about that which they proselytise, but love circle jerking to the sound of their own voices as they rabidly salivate at the prospect of civil unrest like rubbernecking ghoulish perverted fantasists, who have clearly never experienced a day in their life more challenging than observing a shoplifter at Swindon's Outlet Village.
They are fidgeting toddlers without a jot of real world experience in this domain, no genuine intel on emerging crises other than what they see on social media, nor valid source networks from within operations that can substantiate even one of their thrusting postulations. How pathetic they look to those who have a genuine comprehension of the things they are squealing about with missplaced zeal.
They have no literacy in the network of the CRINK-cum-Opec+ nexus of influence. Even more ironically, they don't realise they are actually part of it.
They equally have no workable answers nor solutions beyond their aggrandizing strident mantras on X catered to a boneheaded algorithm that gives their tiny pipsqueak balls a little thrill.
The disdain I have for these cosplay crusaders multiplies by the milisecond.
They are part of the problem at this point, as the dangerous cocktail of ego and ignorance mixed with online faux dopamine has become.
There is a reason not one viable person with real world, professional experience in geopolitics, politics, intelligence and strategy ever joins their knuckleheaded chorus nor shows them any support. Because to anyone with even just one line on their CV pointing to relevant experience, they look like a bunch of drooling pillocks.
1
2
19
1,759
Basil, your talent for turning complex events into anti-immigration propaganda is becoming predictable.
France’s protests began over underfunded schools, teacher shortages and deteriorating public services. Rising living costs and fuel prices brought students, unions and Yellow Vest protesters together.
Violence followed. That doesn’t magically make immigration the cause.
And unless you can produce O’Brien’s actual words, you’re attacking your own paraphrase.
Evidence, Basil. Not insults.
AP:
apnews.com/article/dd78a1a2b…
Reuters:
reuters.com/world/europe/fra…
James O'Brien says it is only racists who will claim the France riots are about immigration
Is he deluded, terminally thick or an outright liar?
7
2
6
1,210
Your numbers show changes in payroll totals, not proof that British workers were “replaced”.
HMRC also notes nationality is taken from the National Insurance registration record, so some people later naturalised as British can still be counted as foreign nationals.
The “cheap labour” line is shaky too. HMRC’s own release shows median monthly pay in Dec 2025 was £2,576 for UK nationals, £2,625 for non-EU nationals and £2,717 for EU nationals.
And “millions of Brits are unemployed” is misleading. ONS put UK unemployment at 1.778 million for May–July 2026. The bigger number being pushed around is usually out-of-work benefit claims, which is not the same thing.
Also, “11 million came here” is gross inflow, not net migration. People also leave.
Links:
gov.uk/government/statistics…
ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabo…
migrationobservatory.ox.ac.u…
FOUR out of every FIVE jobs created in Britain between 2014 and 2025 went to foreign nationals.
Millions of Brits are unemployed and yet the Tories filled hundreds of thousands of British jobs with cheap foreign national labour.
Since 2020:
In London: Brits lost 26,500 payrolled jobs while non-EU foreign nationals gained 465,200.
Scotland: Brits lost 53,000, non-EU foreign nationals gained 130,200.
Midlands: Brits lost 55,100, non-EU foreign nationals gained 375,700.
All because the Tories let over 11 million people come here, despite repeatedly promising to cut immigration.
Many British people’s futures have been ruined as a result.
Reform will end the mass immigration scam for good and put British workers first.
1
859
Valentina, a police officer has been shot. Two suspects are being hunted. Their religion hasn’t been established.
Yet you’ve already declared the shooter Muslim.
Your evidence? A city’s demographics and disabled comments.
That’s not reporting. That’s religious scapegoating dressed up as breaking news.
An injured officer deserves justice, not to have his suffering exploited to spread hatred.
Facts first. Prejudice never.
news.sky.com/story/police-of…
A muslim shot a police officer this morning. You can tell because:
-Comments are turned OFF.
-Gun are BANNED in England.
-Nottingham is full of muslims.
🚨Muslims DESTROY every country they touch. LOOK at France🚨
13
28
306
41,986
Basil, the sheer malice in this post is breathtaking.
You’re positively salivating at the prospect of stripping British-born people of their citizenship because of their parents’ origins.
Two British citizens commit the same crime. One goes to prison. The other faces exile because of their ancestry.
That’s not justice. That’s discrimination dressed up as patriotism.
And your gleeful declaration that a British passport will mean nothing? Think about what you’re celebrating.
You’re advocating a country where citizenship is conditional on your bloodline. Where some British children grow up knowing they’ll never be considered quite British enough.
Criminals should face justice. Equal justice. Not a two-tier system determined by their family tree.
The most revealing thing here isn’t Restore Britain’s proposal. It’s your absolute delight at the prospect of treating fellow British citizens as foreigners.
That’s not patriotism, Basil. It’s cruelty masquerading as national pride.
And the fact you consider it a triumph says considerably more about your values than theirs.
🚨BREAKING: THIS IS A GAME CHANGER
Restore Britain have just announced they are willing to deport SECOND GENERATION MIGRANTS
Yes - That is the children of migrants born in Britain and therefore have British passports
If they commit serious criminal acts, bilateral agreements will be set up with third countries to DEPORT THEM
This is the first time in modern history a mainstream political party has agreed to do this
This is HUGE, it cannot be understated the magnitude of this announcement
Your British passport means nothing
You will not be protected by a Restore Britain Government
You will be deported from our country
The overton window shifts once again
Restore Britain are not messing around
Time to sign up patriots
This is our chance to get our country back
18
10
41
4,505
