You wouldn’t get it

It's amusing that women's biggest hangup about Cornell is the "free p*ssy" snapchat thing, because it tells you what r*pe really is to them, which is the *horror* of no value or currency in exchange for their sexuality, rather than some actual moral offense. It only offends hunter gatherer utility and self-deification in Feminislam ™ Sexuality is their most prized possession, their only (fake) agency, and how they appraise their value amidst low self esteem Insentient Id Slavery and Superego neglect. For p*ssy to be "free" means their entire existence is free, which spergs them out because now they don't have something by which to get men to hunt and provide for them. Of course, they COULD just develop a sense of agency from discipline and Superego alignment, but Lizard Brain no likey metabolizing calories and uncomfy feelsies. To them that is equivalent to death. Moreover, it's amusing solipsistic projection. EVERYTHING to them is about maximizing their interpsychic emotional exchanges, such that THEY are always the ones looking to get male attention and provision FOR FREE, and thus presume it's the same for men. "How could you not try to maximize your coom and minimize your discoom, there's no possible other life teleology!" The femcoomer thinks. As far as what "free p*ssy" means, it's a juvenile college student comment intended to communicate "we're such tough guys that women very easily have sex with us". But of course, women and libtards — despite having magic psychoanalysis intuition powers — don't understand that and instead project themselves into the comment. When THEY would say that, is when THEY would have some chick locked up in a room upstairs held captive.

You can perfectly understand the case of the Cornell 7, and the reaction to it, once you understand that feminists fundamentally reject the idea that women can ever be truly responsible for any wrong doing of any kind. Which is why, when there’s a disgusting drug and alcohol fueled orgy where everyone involved is inebriated, the woman is somehow automatically the victim and the men are somehow automatically responsible. On normal logic, that makes no sense. If alcohol removes consent, then the drunk men have just as valid a claim to being raped as the drunk woman. But feminists aren’t using normal logic. They’re using feminist logic. Which, again, starts with the presupposition that women by definition cannot truly be at fault at all for anything ever. That is simply a brute fact of the universe, in their view. They don’t have to defend it, and don’t, and can’t.

JUST IN: Venezuelan illegal immigrants who are accused of kill*ng 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray, lured her under a bridge where they took her clothes off & r*ped her for 2 hours. The men tied her hands behind her back while they did the unthinkable. After they were done, the men choked her and dumped her body in a bayou. One of the men, Franklin Jose Pena Ramos, then allegedly asked his employer for extra money to leave town. Pena Ramos crossed through Biden's open border at El Paso last month. Both Pena Ramos and Johan Jose Rangel are set to appear in immigration court this August. The video below is of Jocelyn's mother at her vigil.

🚨Sam Altman should be jailed - whistleblower Edward Snowden “Just because you put out a press release saying how ‘surprised’ you were that your AI model hacked your neighbor … that doesn’t release you from the liability,” Edward Snowden stated at the Ethics Forum at ETH Zurich. “I think we need to put Sam Altman in jail, and I think it would be an instructive experience,” Snowden concluded, adding that it is the prompter that is responsible for AI mistakes, as they are the ones who task the agents. 📑But the idea is that now they're talking about agentic AI, which I think is a huge mistake that they're gonna be discovering very soonly. You should not brand this thing as your agent because if the government uses it, you are an agent of government, and that means the Constitution applies to you. And if they ... the government is using your model running on your server, where you are submitting queries, they are then intercepting your query, applying their own system prompt to it, which recomposes your query running through their systems, and it makes a mistake, and people die as a result. Or even if it's correct, people die as a result, as they have in Iran, if reporting is to believe. They believe we're, we're bombing the wrong, buildings, you know, because, oopsie, the LLM made a mistake. And tremendous numbers of, you know, children, the most innocent that we can imagine, are being killed. 🚨Well, who owns the liability there? And of course, naturally, they would say the government owns the liability because you're never gonna successfully, uh, sue the government for this, even though they, they should eat it. But maybe that doesn't work anymore because maybe they are an agent of government. And I don't know where we're ever gonna see standing to sue on this, but we, we should. And people in this room, I think, are frankly going to be called upon in the course of their careers and the course of their studies and the course of whatever you do to contend with these kind of issues. 🚨Where are we gonna draw a line? Because an algorithm cannot make mistakes in the way that we understand it as, you know, you making an error. Because the errors in its outputs are not the computer's. It's the slave to its instructions. The responsibility lies with its developer, its programmer, its creator, its architect, which is to say responsibility lies with a person. And we cannot hide that. We cannot abrade that away, right? A gunmaker is not liable, it's true, for the misuse of a gun. But if during the testing of their latest piece of artillery, they mistakenly obliterate, you know, a nearby village it's not the cannon that should go to jail. And, you know, just because you put out a press release describing how surprised you were that your new model, you know, hacked the neighbor, or you know, how impressed you are by the destructive power of your missile, that doesn't release you from the liability of launching it. The missile didn't launch itself. You pushed it. And, and so there's a lot we can get into, but the idea that I want people to, contend with is, is how we deal with this. And right now, these closed models are saying AI safety, AI safety, safetyism, as they call it, where the idea is these things are so dangerous. Oh gosh, they're so dangerous, but they're so dazzling. They're so important. They're so valuable. We can't get rid of them. But, you know, oh, it's gonna kill some people, but it's all right. You know, that just happens. Oh, it's gonna hack some companies. Oops, you know, whatever. We'll invest in them. 🚨The idea here is who operates this? And this should apply to our devices more broadly around the world. Right now, you buy a cell phone from Apple, and before you're allowed to use it, you have to click okay to continue. And they go, "Well, you're assuming liability for that. You, you clicked okay to continue." You know, Google sells you an Android phone. Samsung sells you an Android phone. You click okay to continue, and now that's all you. But that can't be possibly how it works because you can't inspect the system. You can't understand how it's used. And particularly in the context of LLMs, where you are submitting queries to a model that they are running, where they are for your safety and everyone else's safety, intercepting the prompt and recomposing the prompt saying, "We're doing, uh, applying safety rules and transformations to it," that's on you. But it's not. I can't even see what you did. I asked you a question. You gave me something back in return. And if it's an agentic AI where I'm putting this thing in a harness, right? The harness being just a little program that basically uses these large models to feed it instructions that it can then provide to tools that are existing on your local system. So now your computer that is connected to the internet is being, frankly, remotely controlled, by a model that's far away that you don't understand how it works. But, you know, you hope it works pretty well. And frankly, they do work reasonably well. But every now and then, it might hack, you know, some random company or whatever out there. 🚨I think we need to put Sam Altman in jail, and I think it'll be an instructive experience.

John McAfee’s Head of Security Reveals What He Knew About the Dead Man’s Switch “A couple of days later, he brings out an envelope with these hard drives in it and a bunch of cash. He says, ‘We’re going to Miami.’ I didn’t see the hard drives, but he said there’s an envelope. He gives it to these two guys. He walks out and he said, ‘Son, if anything ever happens to me, I did not kill myself, and that information on all these people is going to be released.’” “I later understood this as the dead man’s switch. Everybody kept talking about the dead man’s switch. Here I am, having been part of it, didn’t even know what it was. Supposedly these two guys had this information and they were supposed to release it if anything happened to John McAfee, as crazy as that sounds. ” -Jimmy Watson

RT @oldbrownsh0e: Awkward!

wtf

History Repeats. We’re at the Dangerous Part.

Taxes are a scam and illegal.

URGENT BOMBSHELL STATEMENT re DISCLOSURE NOW! #ufox #uap #disclosure

Honestly if the Rich and powerful lose control of the AI that would be the best thing that could happen for humanity

JUST IN: New FBI files reveal Thomas Crooks repeatedly accessed 4 encrypted email accounts hosted in Belgium before the Trump assassination attempt.

Everything is so fucked , we are being lied to daily, Federal Representatives don’t don’t care about their constituents, we are playing by the rules while everyone else wipes their ass with them. Shit is gonna hit the fan, there is no going back, there is no resolution

The FBI File on Trump's Assassin Just Leaked...Everything They Told You is A Lie New evidence just blew up the Thomas Crooks narrative. Two mystery men were with him at a gun store weeks before Butler. Another unidentified man trained with him the day before. Even more damning, an anonymous donor paid to cremate him. Who paid? What are they hiding? This new information is disturbing.

The law isn’t going to save you. White men, it’s time to revert to the old ways. This isn’t an empty plea. I’m dead serious when I tell you that if we don’t take things into our own hands then our children and grandchildren will not have a country.

President Trump says Butler, Pennsylvania as—ssination attempt files were altered or destroyed by the time he got into office.

Proceeds to limit who can comment so she doesn’t get to see the New jokes & material.

HOLY FUCK🤯

🇺🇸 | 25 años después de los atentados del 11 de septiembre contra las Torres Gemelas, estas imágenes siguen siendo difíciles de mirar.