America First! MAGA! 🇺🇸 1A. 2A. Retired Aerospace Engineer. PureBlood_CountryBoy. Free_Will_Emergentist 😋. Increasingly Misanthropic. 🚫DMs

America's Heartland
Locus of control is a psychological concept that describes how much you believe you have power over the events in your life. If you have an internal locus of control, you tend to think your actions shape your outcomes. If it’s external, you’re more likely to see luck, fate, or other people as in charge. It’s about where you place responsibility: inside yourself or outside in the world. Zero-sum thinking is the mentality that one person’s gain must come at the expense of another person’s loss. Positive-sum thinking refers to the mindset that focuses on creating situations where all parties can benefit rather than competing for limited resources. It emphasizes collaboration & negotiation to expand the available resources, leading to win-win outcomes for everyone involved. With that said... Lower cognitive ability (IQ), external locus of control (low personal agency) & zero-sum thinking reliably predict stronger opposition to free-market capitalism. These traits often manifest as viewing economic outcomes as rigged—where "winners" must be cheaters because positive-sum growth feels implausible. It explains a lot of visceral anti-capitalist sentiment.
4
7
36
1,920
Under dem rule, things get progressively worse.
MIDTERMS ALERT 🔔
4
87
Dark Skies retweeted
It’s strange how the people who call Trump a Nazi or Hitler are the same people screaming End the Jews. So strange 🤔
85
193
1,759
12,260
We received our $90 Social Security kickbacks from Trump today 😃😃
2
1
2
141
France has entered the zone where recovery is quite unlikely.
looks like a zombie movie
1
1
14
195
Interesting. My question would be over what span of time would the universe begin to wake up? 100,000 years? A million years? Both are very short time frames. Perhaps longer??
What if superintelligence isn’t an accident?
1
3
124
Very often true 🤣
23
AI Truth... A language model is a machine that has read an enormous amount of human writing & learned which words tend to follow which other words. When you ask it something, it does not look out at the world. It produces the kind of answer that, based on all that reading, usually comes next. The model has no eyes, no instruments & no private line to the facts. It only knows what people have already written down. On the other hand, people write a lot of true things, especially when being wrong has a cost. Engineers describe bridges that have to stand. Doctors describe treatments that have to work. Scientists describe measurements that other scientists will check. Those careful descriptions show up again & again in the writing the model learned from. So the “most typical continuation” is often the accurate one, not because the model checked reality, but because reality already shaped what people wrote. Asking AI a question is like asking someone who has read every cookbook ever printed how to boil an egg. They have never boiled an egg themselves. They are repeating the pattern of what cooks wrote. Most of the time you still get a boiled egg, because cooks were describing a real process. Sometimes you get a confused or outdated answer, because some of the books were wrong, joking, or arguing with each other. The model is not limited to copying old sentences. It can stitch pieces together into an answer nobody wrote before. That new answer can be right, or it can be smooth nonsense. Newer systems can do more than guess from old writing. They can look something up, run a calculation, or compare an answer against a source. That is still not the same as knowing the world directly. It is an extra check bolted on afterward. So the simple version is this: the model does not know what is true. It knows what people tend to say. When people were careful & reality was pushing back on them, what they tend to say is often true. When they were guessing, arguing, or performing, the model follows that instead & it cannot always tell the difference. This means most of today’s AI is a very good reader, not a witness. AI has no direct contact with the world. It learned by absorbing what people wrote, said, coded & argued. So its answers are shaped by that record. Where the record is thick & reality kept correcting the writers such as medicine with outcome data, engineering with things that break, arithmetic, well-tested code , the AI is often right, sometimes remarkably so. Where the record is thin, disputed, fashionable, or full of confident guesses, the AI still answers in the same smooth voice. It is following the pattern of how people talk, not checking whether the talk was true. A model of how humans describe the world is not a model of the world. AI can recombine descriptions into something new & sometimes that new thing is right. It can also recombine them into something nobody meant & stated with the confidence of a textbook. Without a way to touch the thing being described, it cannot tell those apart on its own.
58
This is great advice. Thank you AI, robotics & the great new age of abundance.
We spent 200 years training humans to act like machines. Punch in. Repeat. Don’t feel. The machines finally showed up for their own shift. Go be a human again.
3
48
I've always considered it quite low-brow to blame others for your own shortcomings. These people have no self-respect and don't understand personal responsibility.
Anyone else still waiting for the white privilege card they say we have? 😎🇺🇸
2
27
Dark Skies retweeted
Criminals and goat fukers
26
135
282
2,850
Vigilance always.
While AI sharpens its wits, we should not blunt ours. Critical thinking remains our most potent antivirus.
30
Dark Skies retweeted
16
81
242
2,258
15
12
49
553
How many will not accept the pill because of their irrational hate?
To everyone hating AI or SI, however you prefer to call it: one day you might be diagnosed with cancer or another disease that today could kill you within just a few months or weeks. But very soon in the future, you might simply go to a pharmacy, take a pill developed by superintelligence, and live like nothing happened. So keep hating the technology that might one day save your life.
2
3
70
1 of 2 The largest non-polar desert in the world is the Sahara Desert, a subtropical desert in northern Africa covering about 3.6 million square miles. Note: the continental United States is about 3.7 million square miles in area. The Sahara is known for its hot & arid climate, with temperatures that can exceed 122°F during summer. The Sahara's vast area & unique environment make it a significant geographical feature on Earth. Did you know that not that long ago, much of what is now the Sahara supported grassland, wooded savanna, rivers & large lakes? The “Green Sahara” refers to the most recent African Humid Period, roughly 11,000–5,000 years ago. The popular claim that it flipped into desert in about 500 years (or a few centuries) comes from real paleoclimate evidence, but the full picture is more mixed... the drying was driven by slow orbital change, amplified locally by feedbacks & it did not happen everywhere at the same speed. During the Green Sahara, Lake Mega-Chad was the giant early-to-mid Holocene lake that filled the Chad Basin. At its highstand it was the largest freshwater lake in Africa & one of the largest pluvial (characterized by abundant rain) lakes on Earth. At maximum, it covered about 140,000 sq. miles. That is larger than the modern Caspian Sea & roughly 1.5 times the combined area of the five North American Great Lakes. It was on the order of 620 miles long, 370 miles wide & up to about 540 feet deep in places During that humid phase, Earth’s orbital precession shifted the timing of perihelion so that Northern Hemisphere summers received more solar radiation. Stronger summer heating pulled the West African monsoon farther north. Rainfall across large parts of the Sahara had been high enough to sustain permanent or seasonal lakes (including a much larger Lake Chad), wetlands & vegetation. Rock art & archaeological sites show people herding cattle, fishing & hunting animals such as hippos, crocodiles, elephants & giraffes in areas that are hyper-arid today. Similar green phases have recurred roughly every 21,000 years for millions of years, paced by the same orbital cycle. The green phase ended after the mid-Holocene peak. Less rain reduced vegetation cover; less vegetation increased surface albedo & reduced moisture recycling, which further weakened the monsoon. That vegetation–atmosphere feedback is the main reason models & some records show a nonlinear response: a slow external forcing can produce a relatively fast regional shift once a threshold is crossed. Studies show the African Humid Period ending around 5,500 years ago, with the rise in wind-blown dust occurring in less than about four centuries & some interpretations put the vegetated-to-desert shift in one to two centuries. Records from the western margin also suggest the end of high rainfall was abrupt (within a few hundred years) at individual sites, though the timing was earlier farther north & later farther south. Human populations adapted or moved as lakes shrank & pastoralism spread. There is also a debated hypothesis that grazing itself may have slightly delayed the final collapse relative to a pure climate-driven timeline, but orbital forcing remains the primary driver. In short, the Sahara entered a major drying phase around 6,000–5,000 years ago, and some of the best-resolved dust & rainfall proxies show that shift compressed into a few centuries in places. Across the whole region, however, the change was staggered, and “became a desert in 500 years” is a simplification of a threshold response that was rapid locally but not instantaneous or uniform everywhere. For those interested... Earth’s axial precession (the slow wobble of its spin axis) is the effect people usually mean when they link orbital geometry to large climate swings. It is one of the three Milankovitch cycles that pace the ice ages.
2
1
139
2 of 2 The axis does not point in a fixed direction. Gravity from the Sun & Moon acting on Earth’s equatorial bulge makes the axis sweep out a cone, like a spinning top slowing down. One full circuit relative to the stars takes roughly 26,000 years. At the same time the elliptical orbit itself slowly rotates (apsidal precession). The combination—called climatic precession—shifts the timing of the seasons relative to perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) & aphelion (farthest point) on a cycle of about 19,000–23,000 years. Right now perihelion falls in early January, so Northern Hemisphere winters occur when Earth is nearest the Sun & summers when it is farthest. Roughly half a precession cycle ago (about 11,000–13,000 years), the opposite was true: Northern Hemisphere summers coincided with perihelion. That made northern summers hotter & winters colder, strengthening the seasonal contrast. Because most of the land that can grow large ice sheets lies in the Northern Hemisphere, the intensity of high-latitude summer sunlight is especially important. Milder summers let winter snow survive & accumulate; stronger summers melt it. Precession therefore helps control whether ice sheets expand or retreat. Precession does not act alone. Its climatic effect is modulated by the other two orbital cycles: • Eccentricity (the orbit’s stretch from nearly circular to mildly elliptical) varies mainly on ~100,000 & ~400,000 year rhythms. When eccentricity is higher, the difference between perihelion & aphelion distance is larger, so the precession signal is stronger. When the orbit is nearly circular, precession has little effect on seasonal insolation. • Obliquity (axial tilt) oscillates between about 22.1° & 24.5° every ~41,000 years (present value ~23.4°). Higher tilt increases seasonal contrast at high latitudes in both hemispheres. Together these cycles change the distribution of sunlight by latitude & season by up to ~25% at mid-latitudes, even though the total annual energy Earth receives changes only slightly. Paleoclimate records (deep-sea sediments & ice cores) show that glacial–interglacial cycles over the past several hundred thousand years line up with these orbital rhythms. From roughly 1–3 million years ago the dominant beat was the 41,000-year obliquity cycle; after the Mid-Pleistocene Transition the ~100,000-year eccentricity-modulated pattern became dominant. Feedbacks (ice-albedo, greenhouse-gas concentrations, ocean circulation) amplify the relatively modest insolation changes into the full ice-age swings of several degrees & large sea-level shifts. These orbital variations operate over tens to hundreds of thousands of years. After reading about how these cosmic players are the big dogs in climate change over time, blaming cow farts is even funnier.
93
Bingo!
Do you agree with Warren Buffett here? It seems like common sense to me. Thoughts?
1
29
The Ararat–Doğubayazıt highlands area contains ancient marine sedimentary rocks that were later raised by tectonics millions of years ago. It has experienced ordinary river floods & volcanic mudflows. There is not however, any scientific evidence of a recent, complete inundation of the region of the kind required by this Noah's Ark debacle. Geologists have long identified the boat-shaped outline as a natural feature: a doubly plunging syncline (a folded sedimentary structure) modified by erosion & volcanic mudflows from the Tendürek field. A 1996 study in the Journal of Geoscience Education by Lorence Collins & David Fasold, concluded from petrography & field relations that the “iron fittings,” “petrified wood,” & linear “walls” are weathered volcanic minerals (limonite, magnetite), metamorphosed peridotite & andesite/basalt clasts concentrated along bedding in the fold. Recent ground-penetrating radar & soil-organic claims (higher carbon or organic matter inside the outline) have not produced identified wood in published analyses & do not overturn that geological account.
1
114