The Department of Education has had 45 years and trillions of dollars. The report card is in. On the 2024 Nation’s Report Card, only 35 percent of high school seniors reached proficiency in reading. Only 22 percent reached it in math. Nearly one in three seniors scored below basic in reading. Nearly half scored below basic in math. Eighth grade reading is at its lowest point since 1990. The slide began well before the pandemic. Spending did not. Federal education outlays exploded while results went the other way. Since 2000 the Department’s spending rose by hundreds of percent even as its own workforce stayed relatively small. Per pupil costs climbed. Proficiency did not. A bureaucracy that cannot produce literate, numerate graduates has no claim on permanence. An elected administration tried to do what failing institutions rarely do. It cut staff. It canceled grant streams it judged ineffective or captured by ideology, including about $600 million in teacher training awards the Department said were tied to divisive programs rather than classroom results. That is not cruelty. That is the job of an executive who answers to voters. Unelected judges keep blocking the exit. This week a federal judge in Massachusetts vacated the grant directive and locked the money back in place, calling the decision arbitrary. Earlier a court in the same district tried to freeze mass layoffs and halt steps toward shrinking the Department. Blue state attorneys general shop the venue. The Administrative Procedure Act becomes a veto. Programs Congress never made immortal get a judicial life support machine. Here is the logic. If the federal government cannot end a program it finds ineffective, it cannot govern. Results are the test. After decades of flat and falling scores, the burden is on the Department to justify itself, not on the public to keep funding the same machine. Education belongs closest to the child, the parent, and the state. A failed federal layer should be allowed to shrink. Courts that treat every cut as a crisis are not defending students. They are defending a bureaucracy that already failed them.

Republicans spent the last twenty months governing. Democrats spent them trying to impeach the man the country just reelected. That is the record. President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act in January 2025. Illegal aliens charged with theft or violence now get detained, not released. He signed the One Big Beautiful Bill on July 4, 2025. The 2017 tax rates that were set to expire stayed in place. The standard deduction stayed larger. The child tax credit stayed expanded. Tips and overtime got real tax relief. Bonus depreciation and domestic research expensing came back for good. Green New Deal subsidy schemes got cut. Border and defense funding got added. In June 2026 he signed the Secure America Act and locked in tens of billions more for ICE and the Border Patrol. Congress also passed the first federal legal framework for stablecoins. The results followed the statutes. Illegal crossings collapsed. Catch and release ended. Net migration went negative in 2025 for the first time in half a century. Fentanyl deaths fell. Energy production and LNG exports hit records. Parents got the first national school choice program. The federal government was ordered to recognize two sexes, male and female. Paris and the WHO were dropped. Nuclear financing and Alaska leasing came back. That is a governing agenda: taxes, borders, energy, speech, schools, and biological reality. Democrats answered with process, not a competing bill. Al Green has forced impeachment votes again and again, including this month. Leadership voted present. Jamie Raskin says impeachment is still a tool they will not hesitate to use if they take the House. Polls of their own voters show the top midterm motive is opposition to Trump, not a plan for wages, energy, or crime. They have not offered a replacement tax code, a replacement border policy, or a replacement energy policy. They have offered hatred of the president as the product. Voters can measure both sides. One party made the tax cuts permanent, funded the agents, and stopped the release model. The other party is still litigating 2024. That is not a serious opposition. That is a grievance operation dressed up as oversight.

Ground Zero is not a photo op. Families stood there reading the names of people who burned, jumped, and never came home. AOC and Mamdani stood there grinning like it was a mixer. Twenty five years later and they still cannot sit still for the dead. You do not chuckle through that list. You shut your mouth and remember who this country buried. That is not a gaffe. That is who they are. America deserved better on that ground. Those families deserved better than two politicians treating sacred dirt like a campaign stop.

Charlie Kirk spent his life walking onto hostile campuses and asking the questions the progressive left will not answer. He believed America is worth defending. He believed young people deserve facts instead of slogans. Today marks one year since he was murdered for that work. Watch the progressive left, the socialist mobs, and the ten hour a day social media addicts. Many of them will laugh. Many of them will celebrate. Their sermons about diversity, inclusion, and acceptance are a fraud. If you oppose their ideas or reject the policies they champion, you are nothing to them. You are an obstacle to be mocked, silenced, or erased. They will scream slogans into the ether. They will have no answers for logical questions. They never did. Charlie asked those questions in public, in good faith, and paid with his life. Look closely at what they show you today. Hate. Racism. Disdain. Tomorrow some of the same voices will tell you that September 11 was deserved and inevitable. That is the moral compass they actually live by. Remember Charlie Kirk. Remember the courage it takes to speak when the mob wants you quiet. America does not belong to people who cheer when a father is shot for arguing. It belongs to those who still believe debate is better than a bullet.

You are dangerous. It’s not you specifically. It’s your money and influence and buying are elections.

Little Boy Surprises His Favorite Garbagemen piped.video/shorts/Ahr7OkMH-… via @YouTube

The Fourteenth Amendment was written to bury Dred Scott and make citizens of people who had been held as property on American soil. It was not written for a world of jetliners, maternity hotels, visa overstays, and a welfare state that pays for the birth and then for the household. In 1868 there was no federal illegal alien category. There was no Medicaid. There was no SNAP. There was no EITC. Public schooling was local and thin. The country had an open frontier and a desperate need for labor. Most newcomers arrived by ship, stayed or went home, and could not summon relatives by producing a birth certificate. Senators arguing over Chinese laborers and Gypsies were talking about people physically present under a legal order that barely existed compared with today. They were not talking about hundreds of thousands of annual births to parents who entered in violation of statute or came on a tourist stamp to deliver a citizen. That is the core argument against the broad reading. Subject to the jurisdiction meant complete allegiance, not mere presence you can arrest. Diplomats were out. Tribal Indians were out. The people in the debate who said the children of Chinese in California would be citizens were describing a small, mostly male sojourner population with no modern benefits magnet and no chain migration machine. Applying that sentence as a blank check in 2026 is originalism by slogan, not by circumstance. The numbers are not theoretical. Pew estimates about 300,000 births in 2023 to unauthorized immigrant mothers, and about 245,000 of those had a father who was also neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident. Unauthorized and temporary status mothers together accounted for about 320,000 births, roughly 9 percent of all U.S. births that year. Center for Immigration Studies estimates put illegal immigrant births in the mid two hundreds of thousands and add tens of thousands more to long term temporary visitors. Birth tourism is smaller and disputed, but even the lower official counts of nonresident mothers plus CIS ranges of 20,000 to 26,000 a year compound into hundreds of thousands of citizens over a decade whose parents never joined the political community. Those children are instantly eligible for public school, Medicaid, and other programs their parents cannot claim in their own names. TANF child only cases headed by a parent excluded for immigration status covered more than 85,000 households in fiscal 2024 and about 759 million dollars in cash aid that year. That is one program. Education and medical costs for citizen children in mixed status homes dwarf it. The child can later sponsor the parent. Citizenship becomes the prize at the end of an unlawful or temporary stay rather than the result of consent by the nation. A country of 38 million in 1868 could absorb soil citizenship as a simple rule. A country of 340 million, with a record foreign born population, a massive administrative state, and global travel, cannot pretend the facts are the same. Sovereignty is the right to decide who joins the people. Automatic citizenship for the children of those who were never admitted, or who came only to give birth, treats that right as a technicality. The clause had a purpose. Stretching it past that purpose is not fidelity to the Constitution. It is refusal to notice the country changed.

America does not need another experiment in managed decline. The last stretch of unified Democratic power delivered inflation that quietly robbed working families, a southern border treated as a suggestion, energy policy that treated American production as an embarrassment, and a governing style that scolds the public while failing the basics of order and competence. Hand them the keys again and you get more of the same: higher costs, weaker deterrence, and a state that grows more certain of its moral authority as it grows less capable of delivering results. A durable republic needs borders that mean something, energy that is abundant and American, schools that teach rather than lecture, and a culture that still prizes work over grievance. That is not nostalgia. That is how countries stay free.

Public office is a temporary grant of authority from a sovereign people. It is not a career, a lifestyle, or a license to lecture the country while living above the rules that bind everyone else. Americans elect and appoint officials for a simple reason. Those officials work for us. Their job is to represent the citizens who hired them, protect constitutional liberty, write laws that apply equally, oversee the executive branch, and spend taxpayer money with the same care they would spend their own. They are public servants, not rulers and not influencers. Because they wield real power over law, taxes, regulation, and war, every word they put on the record and every action they take in office must meet an extremely high standard. Their statements in hearings, interviews, floor speeches, and official communications are not casual opinion. They carry the weight of the office. Conduct must be scrutinized at every turn. Trust is not optional in a republic. When an official repeatedly spreads misleading or false information for propaganda and political gain, that official has broken the compact with the people who pay the salary. Removal from office should follow. The official should also repay every dollar of compensation received from the first documented instance of the pattern. The same rule applies to those who convert public office into personal or family enrichment. Blatant self dealing, insider advantage, or any other misuse of position should trigger immediate removal and full restitution of gains from the moment the abuse began. A free people cannot afford a professional political class that treats honesty as optional and the Treasury as a personal account. High standards, real consequences, and the expectation that officials tell the truth are not radical. They are the minimum required for self government to function.

What a Democrat used to sound like. "Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed—and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment—the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution—not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply ‘give the public what it wants’—but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.” JFK

Lord Arthur Ponsonby outlined the ten rules of war propaganda nearly a century ago. They remain the playbook for manufacturing consent. Democrats have run them against half the country with precision. Propaganda exists to seize and hold power. It reframes policy failures as moral crusades, turns opponents into existential threats, and trains the public to cheer for outcomes that harm their own interests. The result is measurable damage to the public good: trust in media at a Gallup low of 28 percent, over ten million border encounters from FY2021 through 2024 that strained cities and public safety, and inflation that peaked at 9.1 percent under Biden while wages lagged. Here are the rules and the Democratic applications. 1. We do not want war. We are only defending ourselves. Democrats frame every expansion of federal power, every lawfare case, and every speech code as defense of democracy itself. 2. The adversary is solely responsible. Inflation, crime spikes, and the border crisis were laid at Trump’s feet even when the data showed otherwise. 3. The adversary’s leader is evil and looks evil. Trump has been called fascist and compared to Hitler by Harris, multiple members of Congress, and a parade of former officials. 4. We defend a noble cause, not special interests. Equity, climate justice, and reproductive rights are presented as pure moral imperatives while donor priorities and union power go unexamined. 5. The enemy commits atrocities on purpose. Our mistakes are accidents. January 6 remains the defining violence. The 2020 riots that burned cities receive softer treatment and fewer lasting consequences. 6. The enemy uses unlawful weapons. Disinformation is the preferred charge. The Hunter Biden laptop was suppressed. Lab-leak discussion was censored. Dissent itself becomes the threat. 7. Our losses are minor. The enemy’s are catastrophic. Border numbers were called manageable. Inflation was transitory. Crime statistics were contextualized away until voters noticed the body count. 8. Intellectuals and artists support our cause. Hollywood, academia, and legacy media delivered near-unanimous endorsements, concerts, and op-eds for Harris and the party line. 9. Our cause is sacred. Democracy, science, and diversity are treated as articles of faith. Questioning any of them is heresy. 10. Those who doubt the propaganda are traitors. MAGA voters, parents at school boards, and anyone citing crime or border data are labeled extremists, racists, or threats to the republic. The cumulative effect is a public trained to distrust its own eyes, to accept declining living standards as the price of virtue, and to view political opponents as enemies rather than fellow citizens. A republic cannot function when half the country is taught that the other half is illegitimate. Truth is the first casualty. National cohesion is the next.

America possesses the capacity to renew its greatness through disciplined standards in both public aid and education. A thorough examination of every assistance program would retain support solely for citizens who can prove a vital and ongoing need while terminating any program that fails to achieve clear and measurable success. Resources now diluted across ineffective efforts would concentrate where hardship is genuine. The result would be reduced long-term dependency, higher rates of employment, and a larger share of the national budget available for infrastructure, defense, and opportunity that lifts entire communities. Families now trapped in cycles of reliance would gain clearer incentives to work and build independence. The country as a whole would see stronger local economies, lower crime linked to idleness, and a renewed sense that public help is temporary and purposeful rather than permanent. The same demand for proven results must govern the classroom. Mandate that every student in every public and private school pass a uniform standard test at the close of each grade. No sliding scales, no extra help designed merely to push a student forward, and no social promotion. Those who cannot demonstrate the required knowledge and skills must repeat the grade. Current national assessments reveal the cost of softer standards. Only about 3 out of every 10 4th graders reach proficiency in reading while fewer than 4 out of every 10 do so in mathematics. Among 8th graders, proficiency stands near 3 out of every 10 in reading and under 3 out of every 10 in mathematics. 12th grade results show roughly 1 in 3 students proficient in reading and just over 1 in 5 students are proficient in mathematics. Long-term measurements of 9 year-olds show modest recovery in recent years, yet scores for 13 year-olds remain largely stagnant and in some measures hover near levels recorded 50 years earlier. High school graduation rates approach 90%, yet the underlying skills of many graduates remain truly weak. Real competence in reading, writing, calculation, and reasoning is far less common than the diplomas suggest. Strict grade-by-grade mastery would reverse this pattern. Students would acquire genuine ability rather than empty advancement. Teachers would regain authority to teach to a clear standard. Parents would know that promotion rests on performance. The nation would graduate young people prepared for skilled work, civic duty, and further learning. College entry must rest on the same foundation of demonstrated readiness. Restrict admission, including at community colleges, to those who take and pass the SAT. Require students who borrow public or private funds for higher education to work or complete community service three to five days each week throughout their enrollment. Demand that every online course administer proctored examinations at every major milestone during the semester. These rules would ensure that borrowed money purchases real capability rather than unearned credentials. Graduates would enter the workforce with verified knowledge and habits of responsibility. Employers would find reliable talent. The heavy burden of student debt would shrink because fewer students would enroll without the ability to succeed and more would leave with marketable skills. National competitiveness in science, manufacturing, technology, and trade would strengthen as the pool of prepared workers expands. Taken together, these reforms would restore the American promise of opportunity earned through effort. Public funds would serve true need instead of sustaining failure. Schools would certify mastery instead of attendance. Higher education would reward ability and industry instead of mere enrollment. The people would benefit through higher wages, greater family stability, and neighborhoods free from the despair of permanent dependency. The country would regain its historic edge through a citizenry equipped with real skills and the discipline to apply them. Such a path is within reach if the nation chooses clear standards over lowered expectations and proven results over empty promises.

I asked Gemini to do the same. Clear winner.

I asked grok to create a reboot poster of Who's The Boss. I let grok choose the actors and this is what it came up with. 😂

Medicare for All is pure fantasy peddled by people who have never run a lemonade stand yet somehow want to seize 1/6 of the American economy. Independent estimates put the added federal tab at 32 to 38 trillion dollars over a decade. That is not a rounding error. It would require tax hikes so brutal that even progressive strongholds flinch. Vermont, home of the chief salesman, passed the damn thing and then abandoned it because the required payroll and income taxes would have crushed the state. California keeps floating it and keeps watching the cost numbers explode the budget. Reality keeps winning. Look at the systems they worship. Canadians wait nearly 29 weeks from referral to treatment. Neurosurgery almost fifty weeks. Orthopedic surgery almost as long. The UK waits list sits around seven million while cancer treatment lags and emergency rooms turn into parking lots. These are not glitches. They are features of government rationing by queue. The United States leads the world in cancer survival for major types and develops the breakthrough drugs and devices everyone else eventually uses. Central planning does not invent. Markets do. America is too big, too diverse, too innovative, and too free for this. Ripping private coverage away from over a hundred fifty million people while cutting hospital and doctor payments to Medicare rates would produce shortages, closures, and chaos. Doctors already warn about income cuts, bureaucracy, and declining quality. The politicians pushing this know the math does not work. They sell it anyway because the slogan buys votes and the failure lands on someone else. This is not compassion. It is economic sabotage dressed up as morality. American medicine is not perfect but it is the engine of progress. Nationalizing it would trade choice and speed for waiting lists and tax bills. The evidence is overwhelming. The only question left is how many times the same failed experiment has to be rejected before the salesmen finally shut up. #RetardTheLeft

🚨#BREAKING: Police in Winona Minnesota are stunned after EVERY SINGLE ONE of their Flock cameras were suddenly removed in a single night. According to the police department, all 8 of the town's cameras were cut down and hauled away. Police are asking for the public's help to identify the individual, but the public has been leaving comments like: "The Flock cameras tore themselves down" "Whoever did it, was fishing with me" "Whoever it was, was at Bible study with me"

Hollywood loves to scream about record breaking box office numbers every weekend. Those headlines almost always measure raw dollars collected, not the number of Americans who actually bought a ticket and sat in a seat. Ticket prices have soared for decades while screens multiplied and global markets exploded, so of course modern blockbusters look untouchable on paper. Equalize the metrics by adjusting for inflation and estimated admissions and a very different champion emerges. Gone with the Wind from 1939 still stands alone. It drew an audience so vast relative to the population of its time that no superhero spectacle or computer generated epic has matched it. Clark Gable and Vivien Leigh’s Civil War saga was not just entertainment. It was a cultural event that reflected the grit, romance, and enduring spirit of the American people across generations of re releases. Raw dollar records flatter the present. Real audience power favors the classics that built this country “As God is my witness, as God is my witness they’re not going to lick me. I’m going to live through this and when it’s all over, I’ll never be hungry again.” — Scarlett O’Hara