David StonesFan retweeted
Do being against pedophilia makes one retarded now? We got another one, projecting. @IfindRetards
2
2
23
David StonesFan retweeted
How dare they not support the Epstein pedophiles
28
9
229
3,566
David StonesFan retweeted
So you think teachers have a Constitutional right to wear MAGA hats in school and you also think it’s illegal to wear Democrat t-shirts in school?
1
4
30
Amendment 1 violation in your rewrite.
1
1
1
6
The first amendment right to editorial control allows all websites to censor right leaning voice is not section 230, comrade Section 230 is a great tool to dismiss whiny lawsuits much quicker
1
1
2
23
This dummy blocked me because they couldn’t handle being wrong. Who wants to tell them?
1
24
David StonesFan retweeted
lol “my old timeline” I’m responding to the article we both commented on. There is no link to what you shared. I’m not making a political statement only the contents of the post link
1
1
2
34
David StonesFan retweeted
The article said they were targeting two dozen and they arrested 1. Not sure that’s massive 🤷
1
1
2
32
David StonesFan retweeted
1 person was arrested
1
1
2
36
David StonesFan retweeted
24 people - it says that in the New York post article! lol
1
1
2
37
David StonesFan retweeted
Wrong. Cite the FCC regulation you think applies The FCC is primarily a technical regulatory agency. Not the media police. The First Amendment does not allow them to regulate news
1
1
2
26
David StonesFan retweeted
Sue them for what? An FCC license does not include a contract to report accurately Stations are under no obligation to report news at all
4
1
2
36
Replying to @kautilyakrosh
1A prevents the govt, including the judiciary, from punishing someone for not applying uniform moderation standards or making decisions that are unfair and biased (see NetChoice v Moody, 2024 or see Zhang v Baidu, 2013). For them to do so, they would be...
2
1
1
30
Replying to @kautilyakrosh
1A generally protects unfairness and bias in moderation. The govt cannot force there to be uniform standards. "Bad faith" doesn't mean what many think it does. An unlawful or anticompetitive motivation would be bad faith.
1
1
1
17
David StonesFan retweeted
Man it’s so hard for MAGA to remember who was president in 2020
1
2
240
David StonesFan retweeted
Hello, dope. Who was POTUS in 2020? I'll give you a hint. It wasn't Biden.
1
1
29
David StonesFan retweeted
Trump "I love the poorly educated" he was talking about you
3
203
6,164
David StonesFan retweeted
You seem disgruntled about Covid actions during the 2020 election. Is it shocking for you to learn that Donald Trump was POTUS during that time? You still mad bro? The level of dumb (with a b) is shocking.
3
61
2,095
David StonesFan retweeted
You MAGAs continue to show how dumb your asses are first of all Biden wasn't the President in 2020 it was that idiot you love kissing ass to today.
2
7
233
David StonesFan retweeted
Replying to @hammondst412
Easy one! Biden wasn't President. Next stupid question
2
124
4,803