Why is the Canadian Prime Minister’s Office being run by a far left American Democrat Party activist with no security clearances? How is it that our system of government and laws allows an English globalist banker to take power, appoint foreign far left radicals as his advisers, use his position to advance his financial and ideological interests, and get away with it?
Maia Johnson is currently serving as the Chief Operating Officer of the PMO and a Senior Advisor for Canada-U.S. Relations, yet her professional background is that of a radical American Democratic activist. Giving a foreign political operative the keys to one of the most powerful and influential roles in the PMO is completely unacceptable. How can we ensure our national interests are protected when the very person managing our bilateral relations with the U.S. is a far left American political insider? Handing over control of the Carney government's internal operations to someone whose career is tied to a foreign Neo Marxist political party is a massive conflict of interest that fundamentally undermines our national sovereignty.

Oct 3, 2026 · 3:34 PM UTC

140
1,011
2,233
24,560
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Because the American left is using Canada as a political tool for the US midterms
3
7
45
369
Exactly. Our country and our government is being used as a pawn and a weapon to further the interests of the US Democratic Party. Shameful!
2
1
19
305
Replying to @DeiCivitas
And how is it that @globeandmail @natnewswatch are screaming about Republican interference re Alberta Separatists but are MUTE regarding Democrat interference in the PMO with the hiring of this individual?
3
4
40
253
Very good question
8
200
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Yes. How is? How is it that MPs who cross over are allowed to vote in Parliament? How is it that a PM makes national decisions on his own and keeps failed talks secret? Let's ask him when he gets off the plane.
1
1
19
266
The Canadian system of government concentrates far too much power in the PM. That needs to change.
4
2
30
243
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Boomers, specifically female boomers.. that’s how. 75-80% support with v.high voter turnout. Best described as boredom mixed with toxic empathy
4
1
20
330
Yes. They are enthusiastically driving the destruction of their own civilization, while thinking they’re saving it.
1
1
13
303
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Blatant American interference in the highest office in the land and yet, here we are, Globe and Mail claiming republican interference in Alberta referendum.
2
4
11
141
Zero integrity.
1
9
119
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Shhhhh! If she is fired her replacement will be from the Chinese Communist Party.
1
9
132
All I know is that the Americans screaming loudest about no kings use illegal maids, gardeners and are filthy rich from Trump policies. It's an insane suicidal ideology that they know won't hurt them!
1
1
5
101
How does this address the point of my post?
2
1
89
Replying to @DeiCivitas
This is something @ABDanielleSmith should have questioned when she decided to side with this so obvious globalist and Democrat operative!
2
10
173
We need our provincial and municipal politicians to hold the federal government accountable.
1
6
156
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Mark Carney has 70+ support and was elected by a majority. That's how democracy works. Better luck next time.
1
3
87
You have not addressed the point. You are being disingenuous. Shame on you. Have you no integrity?
1
7
82
Replying to @DeiCivitas
All good questions. 👆👆👆
1
1
80
I'm afraid there are no good answers.
2
81
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Why doesn’t the leader of the Conservative Party have a security clearance?
1
17
Your comment is irrelevant.
1
27
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Because Mark Carney captured the PMO to globalize the resistance to Trump and use Canada as a forward operating base for the globalists
They told you Donald Trump was a Russian asset. They told you he was a Nazi. They told you, for years, in every major media outlet in America, that the man was an existential threat to democracy itself. Once you've told a country that, you have justified nearly anything. So the apparatus went to work. Surveillance warrants on a campaign. A dossier funded by his opponent, laundered into intelligence channels. A special counsel, years of it, and a collusion case that never materialized. Note the sequence. The threat justified the measures. The threat turned out to be fake but the measures stayed. Now he's back as president, and this time he came prepared. The corrupt agencies are being cleaned out. The pathway that they used last time has been closed. So here is the question the Canadian press gallery will not ask. When the people are willing to do that to their own president lose the ability to do it from the inside, do they simply stop? Or do they find a new position outside his reach? Because there is an obvious one. A G7 country. With the longest undefended border on earth. Buried deep in his supply chains. Holding a veto over the industrial states that decide elections. And are entirely beyond the jurisdiction of every agency he just took back. Why capture an agency when you can capture a country? But a country is not an agency. You cannot subpoena it or leak to it. To turn one against him you would need the right man at the top, and the specification is brutally narrow. He could not be bought. A bought man leaves a trail. You would need the perfect Manchurian candidate. Not a man who knows what he is. A man so thoroughly conditioned by a lifetime inside the old order that he cannot see it. No handler. No instruction. Ask him and he would deny it sincerely, because to him it was never betrayal. It was maturity. The adult position. Sacrificing the smaller thing for the greater good, and never once noticing that the smaller thing was his own country. He would need to be formed in the institutions that built that order. Central banking. Global finance. The summit circuit. A career teaching him that the nation state is an administrative unit and that real authority sits above it. He would need to be a technician. Someone who can move a state without appearing to move it. He would need standing on both sides of the border, so that divided loyalty reads as a résumé. And he would need to arrive clean. No riding to nurse. No faction that made him. No debts to anyone in the party he was about to lead, and therefore no one inside it with the standing to stop him. Not a politician. An operator. That man is almost impossible to find. And yet Canada made him Prime Minister in March. He took over the Liberal leadership at the worst possible moment for anyone who actually wanted a political career. He captured a radioactive brand at the worst time in its political cycle. He jumped anyway. When a man accepts a terrible deal, you should stop asking what it cost him and start asking what he was seeking to gain. Three days before he announced, he was not in Edmonton. He was on American television, in full campaign register, aimed at the wrong country. Why would a Canadian soft launch their Canadian political career on an American television show? Then the pattern fills in. He creates a Chief Operating Officer of the Prime Minister's Office, a position that has never existed in the history of this country, and fills it with a former Hillary Clinton American Democratic operative. The same Hillary Clinton whose campaign paid for the dossier. The one that laundered a foreign spy's gossip into an instrument of the American state. Carney closes a Washington-cohosted summit in Toronto with the Canadian press kept outside the room. His portfolio is ninety-one percent American. And in August, the trade talks collapsed. Here is where an honest writer stops and tells you what he does not know. Nobody outside that room knows what Washington actually demanded. It’s never been publicly released. Carney says the Americans asked too much and offered too little. Washington says that is false. Two accounts that are clearly contradictory, and there is no transcript. We are in the fog of war, and we will stay there until the documents surface a decade from now, if they ever do. What we can look at is the convenience of the timing. But lets set aside the disputed part and look only at what nobody denies. Carney suspended the talks. Carney recalled the negotiators. And when the retaliation came, Canada did not simply mirror the American tariffs. It selected. Over seven hundred products, and the pain was directed at Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, weeks before the midterm elections. What do we call a foreign government inflicting targeted economic pain on specific electorates immediately before an election? In any other decade we had a phrase for that. And what did Canada get? Elbows up. That was the war cry. So where are the spoils of war? Where is the reindustrialization of Canada’s industrial base? Where is the diversified market access that was supposed to free us from the Americans? Where is the pipelines to tidewater, the expanded ports, the LNG plants? Groceries are not cheaper. Rent is not cheaper. The tariffs still sit on our backs. A full year of the loudest confrontation with our largest trading partner in living memory has bought this country nothing you can point to, photograph, or carry home. Look closer, though, and we will find that the benefits of the last year do exist, its just that they have accrued in someone else's name. Every dollar of that confrontation flowed one way. The rhetoric ran north, warm and patriotic, elbows up for the cameras. The structure ran south. A Prime Minister whose portfolio is overwhelmingly American, whose closest operator is an American Democratic strategist, whose summits are convened by Washington, spent a year manufacturing a crisis whose targeted casualties landed in precisely the American swing states that decide who governs from that same city. We paid the tariffs. His faction across the border collected the political dividend. Ask who this actually served and the flag on the podium stops matching the balance sheet behind it. Set every fact down on its own and each one has an innocent face. The portfolio is just a retirement account from a long career. The progressive American political operator is just a hire. The timing is just the calendar. The targeting of the swing states with tariffs are just how trade math works. That is exactly why it holds. A single coincidence is invisible. It is only when you lay them end to end, all of them pointing the same direction, all of them costing Canada and paying his American allies. The ambition was never to be our Prime Minister. The office was the means. A credential that let him capture Canada and turn it into a forward operating base, a country pointed south and spent against Donald Trump in an American civil war that has cost the Canadian people dearly and bought them nothing. You have to ask the question eventually. How many coincidences, at this altitude, in this direction, before you stop calling them coincidences? He is not governing this country. He is occupying it. Stop thinking of the United States as a foreign country and start thinking of it as what it actually is, a global American empire that governs through markets, currency, media and defence rather than through legions, and whose provinces keep their own flags and anthems as a courtesy. On that map Canada is not a neighbour. We are the richest province in the system, wired directly into the metropole. So when Caesar took Rome, Pompey did not surrender. He crossed to Greece and kept the war going from the provinces, because a faction that loses the capital does not stop fighting. It relocates. They lost Washington. They went to the most valuable province they had, the one that was already theirs, and they garrisoned it with a man of their own class who needed no persuading at all. He did not have to be recruited. He was already one of them, and the province came with the office. Which is why the whole performance has been aimed south. The elbows, the flags, the defiance. It was never Canadian politics. It was American theatre, staged here, for them. Canada is not being governed. It is being occupied, a province held by the losing faction in the global American empire's civil war. Now on substack (Link in next post)
1
2
19
157
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Great Q
1
6
9
111
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Because Canada's political system follows the UK model, which was set up long ago by the ruling class to give the illusion of a democracy, but in fact to have no material checks and balances. The ruling party can shut down any investigation into its wrongdoings, no matter how blatant. They can completely ignore the will of the people who elected them (see "immigration"). The Prime Minister appears to have unlimited spending powers with no accountability.
9
37
Because the Democrat party has been taken over by communists who are working hand-in-hand with the Islamists to overthrow the American government and they’re going to come through Canada to do it. And Mark Carney is in lock step with them. He is selling us out!
1
9
45
Replying to @DeiCivitas
Because USDemocrats are globalists working for the globalist oligarchy who want to takeover US as they have Cda.
8
70
Replying to @DeiCivitas
By law, she MUST obtain a security clearance. The security clearance is ONLY available to Canadian citizens. The Liberals, MSM and the 'elbows up' crowd are completely stuck on security clearances so why zero questions about hers? Does she have one? If so or not, who allowed it?
1
7
45