Following the preprint of this work, I let Martin Frejno know that DIA-NN output was processed incorrectly, resulting in nonsense data and plots. Mistakes happen, but puzzling to see these weird plots still in the final version (see below). Make your conclusions :)

Apr 22, 2025 · 3:02 PM UTC

2
3
169
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
How do authors explain this quantification problem with Chimerys?
2
3
141
"CHIMERYS v.4.0.21 finished the analysis of the dataset 4.9 times faster than DIA-NN" "Runtimes include spectral library generation" Why include something that is done only once? It's like including the time to install the software.
1
3
116
We did not change the plots, because Q.Value is the run-specific precursor q-value according to github.com/vdemichev/DiaNN/b…. This x-axis is the same for all softwares we compared. You can find your suggested version of Extended Data Fig. 6B below. How do you interpret it?
1
1
88
And there's a clear instruction that Lib.Q.Value filter is mandatory with MBR (link to 1.8.1 user guide github.com/vdemichev/DiaNN/t…, see screenshot below), and I explained it in detail in Twitter DMs. All this time I've been convinced that you would of course fix this.
1
1
118