๐ช๐บ The occupation of Europe has already begun.
Russia does not need to send in troops in order to seize a state. Putin himself called that an outdated strategy, saying it is enough that a country be governed by his puppet leaders. That is exactly what he wanted to do with Ukraine, and when he lost the puppet โ out of powerlessness he began a military invasion as the last thing he could do, understanding that he was losing Ukraine for good. A military invasion triggers sanctions, hits the economy, and occupied territories cannot be recognised as Russian under international law.
Look at Abkhazia and Ossetia occupied by Russia in Georgia; look at Transnistria occupied from Moldova โ they play the role of pseudo-republics and, surrounded by sanctions, they degrade. Even having occupied Chechnya, Putin was forced to install their own puppet government there and in his whole life visited only once โ last year, and even then under compulsion, to settle a conflict between Kadyrovโs servants and Russian servicemen. Look at Belarus โ the country is as if independent, yet fully under Russiaโs power. And no sanctions for Russia for the occupation, no international scandals.
Therefore it is more profitable for Russia to launch its own puppet governments in various states, such as:
๐ซ๐ท France โ Rassemblement National
๐ฉ๐ช Germany โ Alternative fรผr Deutschland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland โ Konfederacja
๐ฆ๐น Austria โ Freiheitliche Partei รsterreichs
๐ฎ๐น Italy โ Lega
๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia โ SMER and Slovenskรก nรกrodnรก strana
๐ญ๐บ Hungary โ Fidesz
๐จ๐ฟ Czechia โ Svoboda a pลรญmรก demokracie
๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria โ Vazrazhdane
๐ง๐ช Belgium โ Vlaams Belang
One should also pay attention to those who are allies of these political forces, who support and finance them, in order to broaden oneโs understanding of who else works for Russia. Of course not all anti-Ukrainian rhetoric means that a person is definitely an agent of the Kremlin and receives money for their work โ though there are proven facts among the forces named above โ but there are also simply idiots, or populists who try to take the votes of idiots and therefore play along with them.
And why should they seize a state, if theoretically, if AfD obtains power in Germany, then Germany passes under Russian control? Suppose Russia obtains control over the strongest states of the EU or NATO โ and that is it: they govern NATO, they govern the EU. They can say with the hands of their marionettes that those must not take Ukraine into NATO โ and that is it: Ukraine will not be accepted into NATO. The same with the EU. They can attack a country where they did not obtain control, or which they need strategically in order to encircle the countries they plan to seize. Control of strong countries allows them to block aid to that state even if it is a member of NATO, and that country will be left alone before the enemy.
Perhaps somewhere this control over the countries of Europe will be temporary โ but we all see how reluctantly Russian marionettes give up power and can even create a dictatorship, falsify elections or refuse them altogether, as we see in Georgia, persecuting political opponents.
Therefore the one who votes for a pro-Russian politician may be doing the cruellest thing in their life, switching on the lever that starts terrible wars and genocides which their descendants will be forced to endure in the future.