Exposing the Unintended Consequences of Digital Trends. Mastodon: @digiconomist@mastodon.nl Bluesky: @digiconomist.bsky.social

It has been nine years since Digiconomist was first launched with the objective of “exposing the unintended consequences of digital trends.” For a big part of these nine years, the sustainability of digital assets such as Bitcoin has been a key focus of the research by Digiconomist. However, in 2022 and 2023 a new digital trend has emerged that has an equal potential to rapidly grow in terms of electricity consumption: artificial intelligence (AI). If not managed properly, AI could be responsible for as much electricity consumption as Bitcoin is today in just a few years’ time. This is the conclusion of a new research by Digiconomist titled “The Growing Energy Footprint of Artificial Intelligence” that was published in the journal Joule today (October 10, 2023). AI-servers are power-hungry devices. A single NVIDIA DGX A100 server can consume as much electricity as a handful of US households combined. Because of this, the electricity consumption of hundreds of thousands of these devices will start to add up quickly. While the supply chain of AI-servers is facing some bottlenecks in the immediate future that will hold back AI-related electricity consumption, it may not take long before these bottlenecks are resolved. By 2027 worldwide AI-related electricity consumption could increase by 85.4–134.0 TWh of annual electricity consumption from newly manufactured servers. This figure is comparable to the annual electricity consumption of countries such as the Netherlands, Argentina and Sweden. While this would represent half a percent of worldwide electricity consumption, it would also represent a potential significant increase in worldwide data center electricity consumption. The latter has been estimated to represent one percent of worldwide electricity consumption. Given the potential growth of AI-related electricity consumption, the new research contains a call to action to be mindful about the use of AI. Emerging technologies such as AI and previously blockchain are accompanied by a lot of hype and fear of missing out. This often leads to the creation of applications that yield little to no benefit to the end-users. However, with AI being an energy-intensive technology, this can also result in a significant amount of wasted resources. A big part of this waste can be mitigated by taking a step back and attempting to build solutions that provide the best fit with the needs of the end-users (and avoid forcing the use of a specific technology). AI will not be a miracle cure for everything as it ultimately has various limitations. These limitations include factors such as hallucinations, discriminatory effects and privacy concerns. Environmental sustainability now represents another addition to this list of concerns. Link to full article (DOI): doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023… For the first 50 days after the publication of the article it can be accessed for free using the following link: authors.elsevier.com/a/1huvY…
18
11
27
22,340
Over the past year, my research has first highlighted the rapidly growing power demand of AI systems, followed by an assessment of the associated carbon and water footprints. My latest research addresses another consequence of the expanding AI infrastructure: electronic waste.
4
4
307
• By 2030, AI servers could generate 131.0–224.8 kilotons of e-waste per year. • AI systems may contribute less to global e-waste than previously anticipated. • The gap highlights the need for supply-chain data and realistic AI server lifespans.
2
1
220
• 2030 AI e-waste could still match Denmark, Norway, or Austria’s 2022 e-waste. • Substantial AI e-waste persists, underscoring the need for data center transparency. The full article is available open access and can be accessed here: doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.…
1
2
188
Digiconomist retweeted
Let’s start the year by reflecting on the colossal growth in the resource consumption of AI and what it means for 2026. At the start of 2025, the global power demand of AI systems was approximately 9.4 GW. By the end of the year, this demand had likely increased to around 23 GW.
3
2
5
576
Let’s start the year by reflecting on the colossal growth in the resource consumption of AI and what it means for 2026. At the start of 2025, the global power demand of AI systems was approximately 9.4 GW. By the end of the year, this demand had likely increased to around 23 GW.
3
2
5
576
Achieving sustainable growth in data centers and AI will therefore require a fundamental rebalancing—one that must begin with transparency.
1
1
207
Links: Power demand of AI systems: doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025… Carbon and water footprint of AI: doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.202…
1
192
It appears the media have moved on to AI where they are, in fact, still using my research. Of course, amid the AI frenzy, it is worth remembering that Bitcoin remains responsible wasting as much resources as AI systems require in total at the moment.
2 years since mainstream media have quoted de Vries on Bitcoin In Mar 2024, a peer reviewed paper by Sai & Vranken discredited the entirety of de Vries' work. His Bitcoin "studies" haven't been used by the media since ...not before 1000s of articles quoting him were circulated
4
514
I moved on to AI about three years ago, but glad to see my name still out there. Pro tip: a current measurement of direct water consumption in New York ≠ the total GLOBAL average water consumption (direct + INDIRECT) in 2021. Try saying something smarter in another 3 years.
Watershed moment: de Vries bogus "swimming pool per transaction" metrics get replaced by @MARA's (real world) water metrics Bitcoin mining operations use 1/3 the water of an average US household
5
5
10,485
Digiconomist retweeted
Google released some new data on the environmental impact Gemini AI prompts, but omitted so many details you can hardly consider it useful. Instead, it does paint an overly rosy picture of the impact concerned. theverge.com/report/763080/g…
2
1
2
590
Google released some new data on the environmental impact Gemini AI prompts, but omitted so many details you can hardly consider it useful. Instead, it does paint an overly rosy picture of the impact concerned. theverge.com/report/763080/g…
2
1
2
590
It also ignores that Google’s total power demand has gone up by a massive 50% over the past two years (driven by AI) despite all the reported efficiency gains (a classic Jevons’ paradox).
244