"Your post was detected by our systems and had its visibility automatically limited for violating X's rules and terms of service"

¿POR QUÉ LA CIENCIA OFICIAL NO SABE EL ORIGEN REAL DEL PETRÓLEO? Porque la versión que te venden es falsa. Te dicen que el petróleo viene de dinosaurios y plantas muertas de millones de años atrás (teoría fósil). Pero hay un problema: se sigue encontrando petróleo en lugares donde nunca hubo vida orgánica, a profundidades imposibles y se regenera en pozos que se creían agotados. La verdad que ocultan: el petróleo es abiótico, se genera en las profundidades de la Tierra por procesos químicos y geológicos. Es un recurso natural que se renueva constantemente. ¿Por qué mienten? Para mantener el mito de la “escasez”. Así controlan el precio, justifican guerras y te mantienen dependiente de su sistema energético. El petróleo no es un recurso finito que se acaba. Es otra mentira para controlarte.

It is not the star of David, it's actually the star of Remphan. Who is remphan? A ancient pagan deity. Later translated to Saturn. Shabbot on Saturdays? Saturday is named after Saturn. Draw you're own conclusions I'm just a guy recognizing patterns over here...

#WeThePeople have forgotten.

“Tiny Hats” Song 🎵 Pretty Catchy lyrics.

⚠️ Shedding Season is right around the corner 💉 🦠 ‼️

C.S. Lewis already predicted that some ass would wear Aslan like a skinsuit to subvert his message.

Japanese tv be like….

If we’re gonna do this, let’s DO THIS!

Genuine question: If the Lindsay Clancy case has shown us that a woman doesn’t have to be held responsible for murder because of her hormone irregularities, then what does that say about women holding public office or any position of power at all?

This is why I don't trust the media. I asked my search engine to pull this up. I believe in evidence. Lindsay Clancy admitted to killing her three children, and prosecutors have presented extensive evidence showing planning, methodical execution, and awareness of her actions. Physical Evidence Method of killing: Clancy used exercise bands to strangle her children—Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months)—in the basement of their Duxbury home. Crime scene: Blood evidence and the positioning of the children indicated prolonged and deliberate strangulation, requiring sustained force beyond unconsciousness. Post-crime actions: Clancy inflicted superficial cuts on her wrists and neck and exited through a window, leaving blood on window sills, suggesting controlled movement rather than a chaotic suicide attempt. Items collected: Police seized exercise bands, a knife, swabs from blood stains, journals, medication bottles, laptops, tablets, and cameras from the home. Digital and Documentary Evidence Fitness tracker data: Showed Clancy moving deliberately between floors during the time window when the killings occurred. Phone and digital activity: She communicated normally with her husband, ordered takeout, and discussed medication, indicating coherent behavior. Internet searches: Days before the killings, Clancy searched for “Ways to kill” and “Can you treat a sociopath,” suggesting preoccupation with violent thoughts. Journals and writings: Detailed medication tracking, daily functioning, and reflections on her mental state, showing organized thought and awareness. Witness Testimony Husband’s account: Patrick Clancy testified that Lindsay asked him to leave the house to create a window of opportunity for the killings. First responders: Officers and firefighters described finding the children with ligature marks and Clancy semi-conscious outside the home. Family testimony: Her mother and mother-in-law testified about her deteriorating mental state, including prior thoughts of harming herself and intrusive thoughts about the children. Forensic and Medical Evidence Toxicology: Blood tests showed medications at therapeutic or low levels, with one at a toxic level taken after the killings, indicating she was not under psychosis-inducing influence at the time. Psychological evaluation: Forensic psychologists testified that Clancy had bipolar disorder but was not experiencing acute psychosis during the killings, supporting the prosecution’s claim of intentional action. Sequence and Planning Calculated timing: Clancy created a 54-minute window by sending her husband out for errands and checking travel times, demonstrating premeditation. Methodical execution: She killed the children one by one, returned upstairs, and staged self-harm, showing deliberate and controlled behavior. Summary The prosecution’s case relies on a combination of physical evidence, digital records, forensic analysis, and witness testimony to argue that Lindsay Clancy intentionally killed her children with awareness and planning. The defense does not dispute that she committed the killings but argues that her mental state—postpartum depression, bipolar disorder, and medication effects—should mitigate criminal responsibility.

"Ma'am, you were doing 93 in a school zone" "Its fine, officer, look heres my Zoloft prescription, I have postpartum depression"

The legend of his greatness will be spoken about for generations to come.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

So it looks like a single juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial is blocking the rest of the jury from acquitting her of strangling her three young children.