You didn’t prove your claim. You undercut it.
Quoting Deuteronomy doesn’t show “Judeo-Christian civilization.” Christians treat the Old Testament as their own Scripture. That’s part of Christianity, not rabbinic Judaism.
Your argument skips what actually defines Judaism after Christ. There’s no Talmud, no rabbinic authority, no post-Temple framework. That’s the core of Judaism as a system, and it’s missing.
The founders pulled from natural law, Protestant Christianity, and Enlightenment thought. You pointed to one piece inside that mix. You didn’t show any real Jewish-Christian partnership.
History doesn’t back you up either. Christendom didn’t call itself “Judeo-Christian.” It saw itself as the fulfillment of Israel in Christ. One covenant brought to completion, one people, one Church. That’s how the Fathers, councils, and medieval Europe understood it.
You’re blending categories to make a label work.
Push your argument a little and it falls apart. Do you follow Deuteronomy fully? Temple system, sacrifices, priesthood? You don’t. The New Testament changes the framework.
Hebrews is clear. The old covenant is obsolete, fulfilled in Christ. That’s what shaped the West.
So here’s what you actually showed. The founders quoted the Old Testament inside a Christian worldview.
That’s not “Judeo-Christian values.” That’s Christianity.