The fact that Tyler Robinson’s defense didn’t use ANY of Candace Owen’s “evidence,” is evidence. Evidence that all her theories hold no water & would be completely inadmissible in court. She’s doing this for the money. She’s doing this for the fame. And what she’s doing is profoundly evil.
998
340
2,628
59,952
You've dismissed the possibility that Tyler Robinson's defense—which the state is paying for—might not have the usual motivations to win their case this time. Okay. But rather than rely on what the state-funded defense is doing or not doing, consider debunking Candace Owens's reporting directly. No, don't debunk her "theories." Debunk her reporting. Explain why her facts, not her hypotheses (which change, as they should, when new evidence comes in) are incorrect. Because here's the thing. The public isn't buying the state's case against Tyler Robinson. And what the shills and useful idiots seem to be doing is deflecting. They're also pretending to forget that the state has the burden of proof. The public sees this. The shills and useful idiots for the state are not coming off as truthful. They're coming off as shills and useful idiots for the state. And some of us remember what the state is capable of.
19
9
180
1,914
You’re a retard. You’re living in fantasy land. How about because it would be debunking Candace claims not her evidence as there isn’t any. How about debunking the DNA, CCTV, his own admissions, his family’s upcoming testimony, ballistics reports.
1
3
23
Replying to @King_ofKings316
You mean the four contributors of DNA, of which Tyler Robinson's is the most degraded? The blurry, faceless photos? The inability of the state to match the "bullet" fragment to the gun? But my favorite demand is that I debunk the family's UPCOMING testimony. No, jackboot-licking dipshit. I'm not going to debunk UPCOMING testimony. May all the state's shills and useful idiots be as useless as you.

Aug 2, 2026 · 9:09 PM UTC

1
2
17
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Gonna save this for when the family eventually does get called as witnesses and they corroborate what's already been reported and you refuse to accept this as evidence as well.
6