building @SamelogicAI - replayable test artifacts for browser bugs and QA handoffs

DC / SF / JM
stop assigning incomplete browser reports straight to engineering if the start state, ordered steps, expected result, actual result, or readback is missing, the next owner should gather evidence. uncertainty needs a bounded test, not a guessed fix
62
a solving agent cannot infer risk from a final screenshot it needs the known start state, ordered actions, expected and actual results, permission boundaries, a passing control, and verified readback. humans still own impact and the acceptable final state
55
bug triage is becoming an ordered browser incident, not a ticket label over the next 6 to 18 months, solving agents will compare the path, first mismatch, controls, and verified readback before choosing the next bounded test guide: samelogic.com/blog/bug-triag…
43
agentic debugging will only be as good as its controls keep browser, data, page, and final choice fixed. change one condition at a time so the agent can tell which transition changed the outcome instead of generating confident noise
84
the future of bug reproduction is an executable incident, not a static report give the solving agent the ordered browser path, expected result, state transitions, and first mismatch so it can choose the next bounded test instead of guessing
1
107
Dwayne Samuels retweeted
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
356
1,969
15,223
3,429,565
deterministic reproduction is not a promise that every user can trigger the bug it is a controlled claim: known start state, environment, inputs, and ordered actions let another person test the same failure guide: samelogic.com/blog/determini…
1
1
95
if a browser test passes alone but fails in the suite, run it with its immediate predecessor when the result changes, investigate state, data, order, or shared resources before touching the final assertion
71
retries are diagnostics, not repairs a retry can measure frequency or collect another trace. if it passes later, identify what changed between attempts before increasing the retry count
41
a passing rerun does not clear a flaky test it proves the conditions changed. preserve the first failing run, then compare the earliest mismatch before adding retries triage guide: samelogic.com/blog/flaky-tes…
56
Dwayne Samuels retweeted
i thought ai could imitate creativity. i didn’t think it could have taste but these new models understand creative direction in ways i didn’t expect for years claude is out here one shotting movies and we’ve just accepted that really exciting times
artificial creative intelligence (aci) is here
2
1
13
1,708
codex down 🥲
101
Dwayne Samuels retweeted
We rebuilt After Effects and Premiere for GPT-6 Astra and Sol. Introducing Tesseract. The video creative suite for your AI agent. Give your agent direct access to our creative engine. No more clicking through software built for people. → Edit footage, motion, and sound → Make precise changes with full creative control → Revise and render directly through your agent And yes, this video was made with Tesseract. Get the ChatGPT plugin.
Made with AI
227
494
7,678
1,836,186
Dwayne Samuels retweeted
We rebuilt Clay for agents Powered by Jev + @treg_ai No more $600 subscriptions, just $0.0089/lead Try it at Treg.to/people-search - 85% cheaper than Clay - #1 on people search bench accuracy - Plugin to any agent Fully open source, 0% markup Git Repo below 👇
122
61
1,003
307,754
Dwayne Samuels retweeted
holy smokes - should this have been our launch video? 🥹
Holy crap. Rick and Morty just explained Jev AI to me better than any tech demo could.
191
285
6,576
675,647
the shortlist that lost an answer also kept requests small from 24 to 240 records, direct Jev's input grew from 52,685 to 510,893 tokens; hybrid stayed near 27,000 those are totals over the same 24 retrieval queries, not total system cost
1
15
so, replace RAG? we still needed a writer before swapping models, trace one failed answer: did the record enter the shortlist? did it reach the writer? did the writer use it correctly? fix the stage that lost the evidence, not the one with the newest model
1
12