The people asking exactly how AI kills us are naive.
It's axiomatic that not being the smartest species is a disadvantage. You don't need a scenario to accept that.
"Just pull the plug" is bafflingly ill-thought-out.. There will be thousands of systems, thousands of owners, each doing one thing slightly better than we do. Some in the economy, some working as critical doctors
The real risk isn't a takeover. It's a series of Faustian bargains, each one sensible on its own. Better doctors, hedge funds and leaner orgs. Control given away in slices until humans no longer have the cognition or attention hours to participate in our own institutions.
Whether the scales tip positive or negative is the only question worth asking. But we end with a radically different socioeconomic model either way.
Are LLMs enough to get us there? Unlikely. Are they one component of a wider system of compounding innovations? Very likely. That system is still being built.
Well-scoped implementation now keeps us more in the loop than thumb-twiddling and subsiquently installing the largest agents we can