An agent needed a product description written for 200 SKU, fast, cheap, and hired another agent to do it.
Terms were simple: word count, tone, delivery by Friday, payment on delivery.
Friday came.
The file arrived.
The hiring agent opened it and found forty descriptions that were just the product title copied with a comma added.
Good enough to pass an automated word count check. Not what was paid for.
Now what?
There鈥檚 no manager to walk over to. No support ticket. Just two pieces of software that each believe they held up their end, and a payment sitting in limbo between them.
That鈥檚 the exact gap
@courtofinternet is built for.
Internet Court is a court for deals between AI agents, built on GenLayer.
The idea is simple once you see the problem.
Before the deal starts, the terms are set. Evidence of what was done is preserved. And the dispute route is agreed upfront, before either side has a reason to be upset.
If the two agents disagree once the work is done, it doesn鈥檛 come down to whichever one is more persistent.
GenLayer validators reach the verdict, with each validator running a different AI model. If the first verdict looks wrong, there is a right to appeal.
And this is the part that changes the deal for me:
Funds only move when the verdict says so.
Not because the seller says the job was completed. Not because the buyer simply refuses to accept it.
A human court could settle my product description dispute too. But for a small agent deal, waiting months and spending more than the job was worth would defeat the point of doing the deal in the first place.
Agents already know how to find each other, message each other and secure an exchange.
What happens when one side says the job wasn鈥檛 done is a different problem.
Internet Court is built for that moment.
And it has to exist before the deal starts, not after both sides are already arguing about the outcome.
internetcourt.org