DeFi needs serious risk analysis frameworks
Apparently, pumping a token 100x in 20 minutes makes it excellent collateral. 🤣
According to preliminary analysis, an attacker manipulated TONIC’s price, deposited it into Tectonic at the inflated valuation, and borrowed approximately $75M in real assets.
nitter.net/jeremybtc/status/20941…
Cronos had to halt the entire chain to contain the attack.
Just another day in DeFi: nine figures protected by a terrible or nonexistent risk framework. 🤡
Price is not liquidity. Market cap is not recoverable collateral value.
A 100x move in 20 minutes should trigger an alarm, not unlock $75M in borrowing power.
This is what we are building
@EndureNet and
@ForgeLending to address.
Forge starts every Alpha market conservatively:
Maximum Alpha collateral
= 10–12% of the Alpha available in its liquidity pool
Maximum borrowing
= Alpha collateral × Alpha/TAO price × 25% LTV
If the pool holds 1M Alpha, Forge initially accepts only 100k–120k Alpha as collateral across all users.
This is only the starting configuration.
Endure miners must then improve its capital efficiency by analyzing liquidity, volatility, concentration, oracle divergence, manipulation cost, and liquidation performance.
If the market proves resilient, miners can recommend safely increasing caps. If risk rises, they should detect it early and recommend reducing exposure or disabling new borrowing.
Endure miners detect and price the risk.
Forge enforces the limits.
The goal is to make the attack unprofitable before it starts.
bittensor:native SN30