Played minesweeper for about 4 hours today. Deer.
16
315
Note that girls only ever bring up their grooming stories in retrospect, because the supposed grief it’s caused them is actually about not being claimed and impregnated by their “groomer”.
1
1
22
534
They lament that they didn’t get the happy ever after fairytale ending with their first “romance”, if you can call it that. Which, to be clear, I don’t disavow.
1
1
11
192
It becomes “problematic” because it ends.
8
72
“Dance for me monkey, dance!” sums up just about every piece of advice woman has to offer on dating.
My boyfriend thinks the big problem with modern dating is that men used to merely have to demonstrate solid long-term potential to be considered. Now, a guy can't get his foot in the door without having short-term dating skills. He's not complaining, mind you. He purposely developed those short-term dating skills & they worked on me 😂 But he has a great point: there are men who are AMAZING long-term options who aren't even noticed by women because they never developed the traits that make a woman notice them immediately!
60
627
“So strong is the power of our will that we are driven to kill ourselves rather than endure willing nothing at all.”
1
1
89
1,189
I wish every single thing was different
1
22
364
Replying to @karlmarxisright
Tired of all the low IQ rightoids and liberals pretending not to know what an operation like this would entail in 2026. It would look like securing access to core banking platforms, data centers, payment rails (Fedwire, TARGET, ACH equivalents), and key executives/IT staff. Decrees would be issued to declare nationalization or state monopoly, transfer ownership digitally, freeze selected accounts, and redirect credit. It would also require locking down digital channels to prevent capital flight, imposing withdrawal limits, and freezing accounts. AI agents or coordinated digital runs would be used to accelerate instability. Following centralization of control, widespread payment disruption would occur in salaries, rent, suppliers, and retail. We’d also have teams monitoring and crushing the rise of any parallel currencies.
22
453
It’s honestly baffling that the UK doesn’t see more Islamic terrorist attacks.
5
29
765
“Muhh it’s cute now but try dealing with this for TWO YEARS” like you can’t just make her kill herself once you’re bored of it.
1
3
44
1,658
*suspended mid air* better uhh get a hand up. Nigga
2
37
592
Are subheijitas even real
13
545
Woman is an unsquarable circle.
The guy is completely idiotic. Your girlfriend will notice you prioritizing agreeability over truthfulness and she is going to resent you for it. She would rather you tell her she is wrong and let her feel whatever she wants to feel.
1
18
525
The clearpill is you either find a woman who isn’t mentally and emotionally 5 years old (difficult but I choose to believe not impossible) OR find a woman airheaded enough to have no real convictions OR just outright accept submission, smile and nod and bite your tongue.
Replying to @Gnihcres
Wrapping up with “remember you are always on the same team” which means “when push comes to shove just shut up and agree with your woman no matter what, or forfeit your relationship”.
1
1
35
866
Add being forever alone after the second case, maybe after the first if you’re a real senselord, and you have your 4 options, in order of preferability.
1
18
234
What is not an option is having a libtard gf and pretending you’re not a cuck by writing paragraphs on Twitter about how to dance around her dominance over your relationship, without ever admitting it.
2
20
198
Maybe even worse than the OP “You can and should have a sparring partner in her” but you can NOT use facts and logic in any of your “lively disagreements”, that would be debatebro which is a red flag and gives her the ick.
Reminder to never ever *debate* your girl. You can (and should!) have lively disagreements about politics/society/culture with her, you can (and should!) both speak frankly, and you can (and should!) have a sparring partner in her. What you absolutely must not do is push the big red button in your brain that says "dEbaTe". You then enter an entirely different psycho/social/emotional register of gotchas, facts & logic, speaking fast like Ben Shapiro, "This House Believes" etc. Importantly, this is neither gender's fault. Men are (often) socialised into a weird non-cooperational debate mode where if you ask "source?" often enough you get to be the leader of your local high-school nerd team. Women are (often) socialised into an emotional panopticon where disagreement is seen as open hostility. Your job as 21st century men and women is to overcome this. Crucially, the emotional subtext of the conversation should always be "we are on the same team". This is important because politics is "we are on opposing teams". So you both should make an effort to tune out propaganda and be two people sharing a safe, warm little corner in this mad mad world.
3
5
114
1,641
“Women cannot be challenged on anything due to inevitable emotional outbursts but it’s just WEIRD for men to care about objective truths anyway. Cooperation is therefore impossible but neither gender is at fault”
1
76
1,610
Wrapping up with “remember you are always on the same team” which means “when push comes to shove just shut up and agree with your woman no matter what, or forfeit your relationship”.
2
66
1,360