My take on her chances at being POTUS: It could easily happen.
But, we have an opportunity to nip that in the bud by ratifying the ' Titles of Nobility Amendment', which was proposed ~200 years ago.
It has no expiration date.
FTR, it is NOT the Emoluments Clause which is already law...it is a proposed Amendment to the US Constitution and I suspect it is very much part of 'The Plan' behind Meghan Markle.
x.com/GoFakeYourselfM/status…
Don't discount the possibility.
Few seem to have put together what's gone on with federal elections, over the last few decades. I spent a lot of time researching this topic to try to unravel how it all went so wrong that NO ONE trusts elections anymore. Unfortunately, most voters are selective and only voice distrust when their favorite candidate/party loses.
Yes, the old dirty tricks are still used...
...BUT, now, there's the complete undoing of free & fair elections through the perversion of federal laws & the U.S. Constitution.
Thanks to the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and the sequestering of exit poll data, the Uniparty can overturn ANY federal election. Meghan doesn't have to win to be declared and certified the winner.
Congress has usurped the states' power to regulate elections with the passage of the HAVA.
They've been padding voter registration rolls for 25+ years.
Voter turnout has historically been very low. These days, some districts report MORE THAN A 100% voter turnout rate -- which is obviously impossible without massive voter & election fraud.
Congress mandated hackable electronic voting systems, through the HAVA.
*ahem*
Congress also created a 'Federal Voter Registration Form.' With it, ANY fictional person can be registered to vote with only a signature attestation in the fictional name registered.
Fraudsters can even provide a PO Box mailing address and then mark an 'X' on the blank cross-street map that's on the federal form indicating they are homeless and usually hang out there. They do not need a residential address.
I'm sure you noticed that Covid facilitated mass mail-in voting, allowing people to vote without having to go to the polls and usually without proving ID.
The media agreed not to report exit polls until polls are closed after Bush v. Gore. Since then, that protocol has evolved into sequestration PLUS the adjustment of raw exit poll data to... *cough* "MATCH THE ACTUAL RESULTS," before it's reported.
If you have adjust raw exit poll data to MATCH THE ACTUAL RESULTS, that is evidence of fraud. A simple margin of error suffices!
In 2000, Florida news stations were reporting exit polls showed Bush winning, but others reported Gore was winning. We were told a few people got out of line to vote because of the exit polls, oh noes!
The media cried in unison, "The exit polls were wrong!!!"
No. Actually, it was a very close election so the conflicting exit poll projections were SPOT-ON.
Exit polls were the voters' safety net and the pathway to challenge stolen elections in court. They are a fair reflection of voter preference and compelling evidence.
Now, we have no safety nets and 'they' can foist anyone they want on voters -- even Meghan. We can't do anything about it except maybe revolting.
If the GOP nominated someone polarizing enough, Democrats will "just vote BLUE'...
...unless they are Megxiters, ofc. I don't think any Megxiters could stand voting for her. They'd probably sit it out or vote for a third party.