Loving God, People, and Country with passion, wit, and humor. A word spoken in warmth adds a sincere friend and a heart full of happy memories.
- Tweets 4,588
- Following 685
- Followers 23,644
- Likes 2,948
RT @thesurefoundtn: Latter Day Saint women should be the first to stand against abortion. I urge those offended by the Church’s official st…
84
252
It's time to fully restore the honor of our military heroes @PeteHegseth The @SecWar should be informed that if HHS determines a drug must be issued an EUA, it requires informed consent from service members (DoDI 6200.02). The Assistant Sec. of Health must authorize initial use and then obtain permission from the Under Sec. of Personnel and Readiness. Then, the Sec of the Army must establish a medical protocol with the Surgeon Gen of the Army. Then the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the DoD's general counsel must sign off on that protocol.
After which, the Surgeon General must coordinated with the U.S. Army Medical Research & Development Command to establish an Institutional Review Board to obtain reports of adverse effects of the durg's use and to ensure no service member is punished for refusing the EUA product.
@PeteHegseth this is not rocket science. It is plainly laid out in various DoDIs and federal law. The punishments were not "mistakes"; they were clear, well-established violations of federal law. The political consequences to the DoD agency and the 6 civilian appointees running it under Biden for violating such laws cannot be the reason it has taken two years to determine whether those laws were indeed violated.
Whitewashing the criminal activity under an after-action report is not honor; it is avoidance of honor, and it spits in the faces of all those who served this nation with such honor.
Call me, and as an expert in the subject matter, I'll write a report in under 10 pages to restore the honor those civilians stole from our military heroes by exposing the lawless activity of the Senior Pentagon Leadership. Of note, your Marine JAG still has unlawful orders in effect.
3
60
127
6,840
Brian Ward retweeted
Large medical freedom coalition with a social media footprint of over 63 million followers tells Kennedy and Trump “Remove mRNA shots or pay a political price.”
justthenews.com/government/w…
275
1,593
5,499
458,344
BREAKING: Former governors Inslee (WA) and Brown (OR) filed responses in two SCOTUS cases. Asked what authority they had to mandate COVID products immune from liability while bound by federal contracts requiring voluntary consent, they pointed to the Ninth Circuit—which ignored those contracts.
The question is whether states can mandate experimental drugs while also requiring a waiver of the right to sue if injured. Neither governor could defend the 9th Circuit's opinion, nor did they try. In other words, America, the COVID-19 mandates were unlawful as applied to drugs classified as investigational and products immune from civil liability.
Why? You hold a privilege of citizenship and a fundamental right to sue when injured, and states are precluded from using coercion to separate you from that right by punishing you for refusing drugs immune from civil liability. This fact has 200 years of Supreme Court precedent behind it. These cases END all vaccine mandates in the nation as we now know them. Stand by for major updates coming over the next two weeks.
63
548
1,605
33,701
The current Supreme Court is responsible for the greatest loss of rights this nation has ever known. On Nov, 10th, 2025, without any fanfare, SCOTUS refused to overturn Maine's Supreme Court's ruling that a person committing battery against another member of society is shielded under the PREP Act. Battery is defined as "the intentional, unlawful physical contact with another person without their consent." If we, the American people, do not have the right to sue someone who injures us through nonconsensual conduct, then the Constitution is dead on arrival. On September 28th, SCOTUS gets another shot at redemption. Update coming on Wednesday.
4
92
226
4,338
Here is the November 10th case: supremecourt.gov/search.aspx…
4
8
529
Breaking...U.S. House calls on Dr. Terry Adirim to testify about her role in destroying the lives of thousands of military members subject to COVID-19 mandates, which federal law and DoD regulations prohibited. Read Rep. Harris's press release here: harris.house.gov/media/press…
27
290
812
93,507
A letter goes to Congress this week on the FDA’s continued use of an unlawful Biden-era regulation that allows biomedical experiments on Americans without their knowledge or consent. Yes, you read that correctly. I will publish it here no later than Wednesday.
4
95
262
2,850
SCOTUS is considering whether to hear a petition in which the 9th Circuit claims that states can require citizens to inject experimental drugs, EVEN if they "pose a significant risk of adverse events," AND prospectively waive any right to sue as a condition of public employment.
24
107
274
6,414
Breaking...police, firefighters, and EMTs take the 9th Circuit to SCOTUS. The Circuit held that a city can require the injection of a known dangerous experimental drug AND require a waiver of the right to sue if injured as a condition of public employment. INSANE ABUSE of POWER.
36
470
1,078
14,898
I'm a consultant on this case: thefederalist.com/2026/08/26…
12
35
125
3,506
"JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”—Justice Amy Coney Barrett. WOW!
1
7
38
1,733
I've been quiet on X because I've been working 14-hour days for America's benefit. Stay tuned this week for announcements. I haven't gone anywhere :)
6
4
68
1,275
9th Circuit UNLEASHES HORROR on America!
Federal Judges TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON sua sponte held that a state or city can mandate that public employees inject experimental drugs that pose serious adverse effects and do nothing to stop the spread of the virus, while ALSO requiring them to waive their 14th Amendment right to sue when injured.
The judges ignored the federal contract WA state is under, prohibiting that conduct; ignored the PREP Act's express preemption clause, preempting that conduct; ignored the longstanding Supreme Court precedent that constitutional rights cannot be waived via coercion; and issued substantive rulings before dismissing under Rule 12(b)(6). Then, the judges literally made up a nonexistent precedent as a means of dismissing claims. These judges pose a threat to national security. Supreme Court petition inbound.
NOTE: If a mayor can mandate such drugs, so can school superintendents, governors, fire chiefs, and state licensing boards for professional workers. This is an assault on America.
24
168
344
9,898
The Supreme Court will consider four petitions, all asking the same question: can a state require a citizen to engage in a mandated activity while shielding itself from civil liability if compliance results in the loss of life, liberty, or property to the citizen? Massive implications for the nation!
44
214
1,519
73,722