Better football program over the last 5 years: Texas
Over the last 10: Oklahoma
Over the last 20: Oklahoma
Over the last 50: Oklahoma
Over the last 100: Oklahoma
All Time: Oklahoma
Enjoy your little window while you have it, Texas.
I’m so confused why Oklahoma is flag planting that they beat themselves
Ok? You want me to tell you yall suck? I truly don’t understand this point or what yall want
You pull for a team incapable of winning. Better?
1/ A lot of people are going to overstate what the Protect College Sports Act actually does.
Even if the House passes the Senate version, it will NOT end NIL, kill the transfer portal or magically return college football to the old model.
Here’s what it WON’T do: 🧵
8/ It will NOT blow up existing TV contracts or immediately create one giant national college football TV deal.
Media-rights pooling under the bill is voluntary, and existing media contracts are protected.
8/ It will NOT blow up existing TV contracts or immediately create one giant national college football TV deal.
Media-rights pooling under the bill is voluntary, and existing media contracts are protected.
1/ If the House passes the Senate version of the Protect College Sports Act unchanged, college sports would get a much more uniform federal framework for NIL, transfers, athlete protections and NCAA enforcement. Here are the biggest changes: 🧵
6/ Athlete protections: scholarships could not be revoked solely for injury or athletic performance. The bill also includes post-eligibility medical coverage, academic protections and specific protections aimed at women’s and Olympic sports.
7/ Bottom line: NIL and direct athlete payments do NOT go away. What changes is the structure: fewer transfer loopholes, tighter NIL/agent rules, a defined retention-spending mechanism and much stronger national rules for the NCAA/conferences to enforce.