6500 genetic differences between a male and female. A Y chromosome in your DNA means, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but you're still a pig”.
Dreaming of an island oasis.
- Tweets 46,684
- Following 916
- Followers 13,140
- Likes 157,184
Pinned Tweet
Thank you $MU for another 24% ROI trade in 2 days. I trimmed heavier than my normal 10% but still right at 1/2 position in $MUU will use the gains to keep adding to my calls collection. How many traders were screaming about buying $MU $MUU Jul 2025, Feb/Mar/Apr 2026, and late Jul/Aug 2026?
Guys I don’t know if I’ll have time to give you everything I’ve bought and sold today but. Here’s a shot. Went long $GDXU $GDX did not close my short but reduced it down to a 1/4 I may add to it. Two different accounts. But for now trimmed it down by 1/2 $GDXU bc it hit over 10% return. But think this may run a couple of days.
$MUU bought another 1/4 position just trying to build this back up to a full swing position in time for the run up into ER. Mentioned a million times b4 but I’m stacking this and only trimming 10% on super strong days. Avg was $29.62 look through my older $MU chart from Aug/July) for levels.
4
1
49
15,055
Ya know what else was red besides charts? Sydney Sweeney in this dress. Boss babe and total smoke show. 😝
Sydney Sweeney is the funniest stress test feminism has ever encountered bc I was taught that tHE PaTriArChY reduces women to their bodies, denies them individual agency and imposes rules on female sexuality based on what everyone else thinks women ought to be. Meanwhile Sydney is independently wealthy, produces her own projects, owns businesses, chooses to monetize her own sexuality, gains power from doing it and appears completely uninterested in anyone’s permission. And somehow the feminist response is thousands of women materializing to explain that her body is AcksHuAllY a collective political resource and she has a responsibility to use it in ways they approve of bc otherwise she’s “setting women back 100 years” (fucking LOL)
So congratulations ladies! You defeated the patriarchy by becoming an enormous decentralized committee of women policing another woman’s sexuality, scolding her for appealing to men and reminding her that her individual choices must remain subordinate to what is best for Women As A Class.
Perhaps the funniest part is that the men supposedly enforcing this grand patriarchal system are mostly standing off to the side like “Sydney seems great, let her cook” while the Feminist Liberation Committee is furiously drafting new regulations for what she’s allowed to do with her own gigantic knockers.
Incredible operation. You guys are fucking killing it. Extremely boss babe. Very liberation. No notes.
5
28
4,924
Updated through Sep 27, 2026. $SOXX
Primary bias
Higher-timeframe bull. 1D bull. Weekly momentum unrepaired. 1H mature.
Working EW count:
95.94 → I 267.24 → II 148.31 → III 655.95 → IV 464.08 → V developing
Inside V:
V-(1) 464.08 → 566.02 → V-(2) 489.21 → V-(3) underway
Same-degree V-(3) gate: 654.15
Alt and gotchas are in the comments. Here is the upside ladder in $SOXX with levels and some time.
4
1
24
1,862
Traps in $SOXX (analysis up until 9/27/26)
The only confirmed divergence on the sheet is 1H Std Bear. Daily / Weekly / Monthly are HH/HH or still in bull range.
The bull trap that is live is 1H into 579.87–585.
The bull trap that would promote to parent 1D would be Std Bear on a high above 575.69 - not printed.
The bear trap that stands out would be selling 551 / a MACD dip as if 1D or 1W Std Bear already exists. They do not.
3
413
Alt bias in $SOXX - $655.95 is terminal. 464.08 is A/W. This upside rally is a wave B/X.
Weekly MACD is still unrepaired (−3.58). A print through 655.95 does not kill this alt on its own an expanded B flat can exceed the prior high.
It weakens only if Weekly MACD repairs, price accepts and holds 591–594, the advance subdivides as a motive/impulse wave, and the next correction does not give us a HH.
Primary is still IV complete / V developing from 464.08. Downside ladder is below.
284
Gave these same $GDX levels on Sep 2 and 16. I was $0.05 from Fridays low in $GDX and my $GDXU short is up 63%. Only at 1/4 position now. I did start a long position sold off 1/4 on that pop so it’s down to an 1/8. I’ll keep you updated trying to decide if this gap is exhaustive or an acceleration (wave 3).
1
20
2,188
$MU — what I’m watching (updated through 9/27/26)
The big picture in $MU is still a rebound inside a larger pullback. I think $MU is in B-(c), probably in parent-(c) Wave 3, and $1,108.72 is most likely a lower-degree Wave-5 candidate inside of a developing Wave 3 meaning I don't think our wave B is finished (higher we go). The chart imo just looks amazing. Obviously taking out our current $MU ATH changes my basic idea that on a higher timeframe we are in a larger pullback.
The Sept high at $1,108 is just a stall not a top imo. The move off $902 is still acting like a trend on the smaller charts. First real upside test is :
$1,120->$1,136->$1,153.05 (bigger and more important) $1,185–$1,196.
RSI: 4-hour has Std bearish divergence at $1,108. 1D and 1W do not. Price made a higher high, RSI confirmed. The hidden bull from $887 → $902 is still intact. $MU
I'm holding my longs and will like add to them. The long idea while $1,081–$1,087 holds and $MU 1W stays above $1,075. Get defensive under $1,081, then $1,044. The rebound thesis is in trouble under $887.
Not financial advice. Levels from my charts through Sep 25. I'll put the Alt in the comments. $MU $MUU
We have in $MU a 1H Std Bear div off $1,064.47, and that signal produced our current pullback to $1,022.69. But, it's lower degree only. 4H RSI 73.95, Daily RSI 61.24 and Weekly RSI 63.72 all confirmed the higher high, while Daily/4H remains bullish. The current pullback has retraced only 25.8% of the $902.60→$1,064.49 advance and is sitting directly on the $1,019–1,023 support cluster. A flush below $1,022.69 with 1H RSI holding above 55.16 would create fresh Regular Bullish divergence.
$1,017–1,022 also completes the C-zone of a developing lower-TF bearish Cypher, which could drive a rebound through :
$1,039 → $1,044 → $1,049–1,050 → $1,054–1,055
A recovery through $1,064.49 with RSI confirmation keeps my idea that the B/c wave is incomplete and opens a bullish ladder:
$1,071.92 → $1,099.85 → $1,128–1,136.
Failure of $1,019 without bullish div opens the exceptionally clean $1,001.66–$1,002.65 cluster, then $987.59–$983.55. If $MU makes a HH: 1H RSI <80.272 would be bearish; add 4H RSI <73.95 and especially Daily RSI <61.24 and we'll see this $MU B wave up likely end. RSI will tell us whether $1,064.49 was the top or whether today's weakness is the higher-low reset preceding another push toward the $1,128 and ultimately $1,180–1,196 B termination zone.
My expectation is $MU sees $1180 before beginning on a C wave down. But, let's see how it all plays out. $MU $MUU
8
3
45
7,281
Alt bias for $MU is actually even more bullish. So, I'm in a bullish or should I be even more bullish decision mode. 😬The simple distinction is:
Primary Bias: still in corrective B-(c), with the important terminal region still higher.
Alt: $737.88 began a new impulse, but we don't jump to this idea just by making another high. $1,255 must be cleared, and $1,370.18 is the real higher-degree W3 qualification level.
3
678
Primary bias: $EDV terminal bullish-reversal setup - not confirmed yet.
When Green Wave 5 of this contracting ending diagonal finishes, it should simultaneously complete larger degree Pink Wave 5. The next same-degree move should then be a post-diagonal thrust higher in $EDV.
$EDV / $ZROZ are the aggressive vehicles because of their extreme duration and convexity. $TLT expresses a similar Treasury-price direction but less duration.
Why is this EXTREMELY IMPORTANT? Because if $EDV produces the kind of post-diagonal thrust this structure implies, long yields could fall SHARPLY. That could coincide with an equity crash if the move is being driven by recession, credit stress, deleveraging or a flight to safety (BEAR PORN). Whether falling yields are bullish or bearish for stocks depends on credit, growth and liquidity conditions.
First the technical setup:
$EDV either holds the 25 Sep $56.91 Green Wave 5 low candidate - almost exactly the Green Wave 4 $66.70 −225° level at $56.88, while also completing the 64-bar 8×8 square from Green Wave 4 or it prints one more marginal low into roughly $56.40–$55.87.
Confirmation comes in stages. We close through the internal Green Wave 5 corrective channel ($59.3)
→ recapture the Green Wave 1–3 line ($59.8)
→ reclaim $60.42 / $61.46
→ Daily/Weekly close through the falling Green Wave 2–4 line = SETUP CONFIRMATION
As long as Green Wave 5 remains smaller than Green Wave 3, the 3-3-3-3-3 contracting ending diagonal inside Pink Wave 5 remains structurally intact.
The 1D / 4H / 1H bullish harmonic crab remains active below $56.91, with the strongest completion zone extending into the mid-$56s and towards our EW contraction boundary. 1D Std Bull divergence is developing between Green Wave 3 and Green Wave 5:
**Note there is still no RSI regime shift yet.
Time: Sep 25 completed the 64-bar square from Green Wave 4. I have time analysis clusters most heavily around roughly Oct 8–17, but that is a window, dates don't always match. The low may already be in, with Oct instead marking the reversal acceleration, Green Wave 5 channel break or the larger Green 2–4 confirmation sequence.
Invalidation: a material break in $EDV below approximately $55.87, where Green Wave 5 = Green Wave 3 in price length, damages my idea that this is a contracting-ending-diagonal.
See comments for the alt path and my playbook, because if this confirms, the macro implications could be MASSIVE.
7
3
34
2,930
I can tell by the lack of interest in this post some of you or even most of you don't have any clue what this means because every single stock trader should be a little interested in this one.
3
6
951
from Grok: If EDV reverses its long downtrend and surges, long-term Treasury yields would fall sharply. That lowers borrowing costs for mortgages, businesses and the government, which can ease financial conditions. For the economy it helps if driven by softer inflation or expected cuts. For stocks lower yields support higher valuations, yet a big drop often signals recession or credit stress fears. In that case equities usually sell off hard as growth and profits weaken while money flees to bonds. Outcome depends on credit and growth signals.
1
2
8
699
@grok can you give the macro implications for the US economy and stock market in easy to understand language if @HeidingOut is correct and that $EDV is about to correct this downtrend from March 2020 (read the post and all of her comments).
2
3
342
Playbook Option D (ALT 1)- My Diagonal is Dead / Higher Yields. The contracting ending-diagonal thesis has failed. Activates IF $EDV breaks below $55.87 and holds.
→Core (zeros): flatten. Stop defending an ED thesis.
→Do not: buy $IWM, short oil, or buy $TMF
→Downside Ladder looks like this: $55.42 → $55.01 → $54.27 → $52s (then $48.90 stretch).
→rebuild your wave count, you suck.
1
2
263
Playbook Option C - Mixed Tape
Use this the week $EDV breaks higher if the regime is not clear.
Activates IF $EDV is through $59.3 AND credit is flat AND $VIX is quiet AND oil is still around $100 (or not confirming A or B).
→Core (zeros): starter $EDV or $ZROZ only. Half size maybe a quarter.
→Credit risk: no $HYG short yet. Wait for spreads to actually break.
→Stock-market crash hedge: off. Do not short $QQQ / $SPY / $IWM.
→Bank stress: no $KRE short.
→Oil / inflation: do not short oil. $100 crude with no credit break is not Option B.
→Small caps: no longs or shorts on $IWM
→Rate-sensitive stocks: no $XLU / $XLRE add yet.
→Flight to safety: gold optional but small. Not a substitute for $EDV.
→Leverage: don't use $TMF here, HEIDI!.
→Next steps: we wait for $EDV ($60.42 / $61.46). If credit then breaks, switch to Playbook A. If credit stays tight, $VIX stays down, and oil breaks, switch to B.
Do not force A or B onto a mixed, indecisive week.
1
258
Playbook Option B Hike Path Broke
Use this the week $EDV breaks higher only if credit is not breaking and inflation pressure is fading.
Activates IF $HYG is up, credit spreads are tighter, $VIX is down, AND oil is down.
Core (milder duration): you could add $TLT rather than zeros. Just a thought.
→Stock-market crash hedge: off. Do not short $QQQ / $SPY / $IWM.
→Oil / inflation broke: short oil / $XLE / $XOP (ok?)
→Growth metals: short copper allowed (same job as oil, often cleaner).
→Small caps: long $IWM allowed after $61.46, not at $59.3.
→Rate-sensitive stocks: $XLU / $XLRE better first add than $IWM.
→Flight to safety / lower real yields: gold allowed. Not a substitute for long $EDV.
→Yield curve: long 20s/30s vs short 2s (cuts getting priced).
2
295
Playbook Option A Credit Risk / Growth Scare
Use this the week $EDV breaks higher **only if credit is actually breaking.
Activates IF $HYG is down, credit spreads are wider, AND $VIX is up.
→ Credit risk: short $HYG (or $CDX). Better first trade than short $QQQ.
→ Stock-market crash hedge: put spreads on $SPY or $IWM - not a full-size short of the index.
→ Bank stress: short $KRE only if regionals break with credit.
→ Yield curve: 2s can fall harder than 30s after the shock (steepener).
→ Oil / inflation: do not short oil unless $WTI breaks with credit.
→ Small caps: DO NOT long $IWM here.
→ Flight to safety: small long gold is fine. Not a substitute for long $EDV.
4
375
