We're grateful to all of you for being as stubborn as us, for putting your trust in us as we build for a world without capturable centres. Read Holo Ventures' paper for a frank facing of our challenges, our accomplishments, and why we believe the world needs this now more than ever.
Holo
@H_O_L_O_
Sep 16
Holo Ventures just published a new paper. In the nine years since we published the original Green Paper, we can look back and say three things: 1. Our diagnosis of where the world was heading was spot-on. 2. We underestimated how long it would take to build a solution. 3. The world needs capture-resistant infrastructure more than ever. We're saying this now because one thing has changed: the infrastructure is ready. It's been a long journey, but we've passed the hardest milestones and we're ready to help you rebuild the world different. Come build with us. decent.holoventures.io

Sep 16, 2026 · 5:05 PM UTC

7
33
137
9,022
The pragmatic case for decentralisation is more salient now than it was in 2017 -- it's becoming clearer by the day that centralisation is a strategic vulnerability for communities, institutions, and businesses. We've got the tools, along with hard-won wisdom about building for decentralisation, and are ready to help people build solutions.
1
23
1,700
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @Holochain
You're all so slow over there at Holo. You work and make progress at a snail's raise. Hurry up a bit while we're still young.
1
68
Replying to @Holochain
The paper reads well for the part about the history of Holochain development, mission, values, etc. But unfortunatly, I cannot understand how Holo Ventures escapes the centralization slipery slope that constitutes the curnel of the paper. It still comes accross as a tangential economic centralization potential, even though Holochain allows the parallel evolution of p2p economics. The Venture is itself a traditional centralized entity. I'm not saying that there is no place for traditional firms in the Holochain ecosystem. We strongly advocate for traditional organizational forms within the OVN model, that serve peripheral roles, as interfaces beyween the p2p economy and the traditional economy, a critical function for transitioning from one economy to the other. The important term there is "peripheral". Holo Ventures positions itself in this paper as core, alkng with the Holochain Foundation, Holo, Moss and Unit. It also has "Holo" in its name. We strongly advise against using the name Sensorica for any Custodian or Exchange Firm that serves the Open Value Network (traditional forms, interfaces) preciselly to avoid even the perception of centrality, and to make it easy to cut the links to these organizations in case they stop serving the network. I'm convinced that Holo Ventures has an important role to play. I'm not satisfied about how it is positioned to play this role and the narrative (this paper) created around it is confusing, so say the least. There are genuine models that avoid centralization at the economic layer. We've been working on one and we've chosen Holochain to build the infrastructure. That's the part that is missing from this paper. Acknowledging these models would make this paper more coherent, because the claim of uncapturability would hold up to the economic and even social and cultural layers. Ending with a "don't be evil" promisse by a traditional centralized orgabization is not the same as demonstrating an uncapturable economic layer.
2
7
364
Replying to @Holochain
İnanıyor ve sabırla bekliyorum sonu güzel olacak biliyorum 0.30 cent hedefim
1
1
220
Replying to @Holochain
Allah rızası için Allah'ınızı Peygamberinizi seviyorsanız fiyat artsın artık. Evlenecem nolur.
1
169
Replying to @Holochain
Is this the new fairy tale to screw over the new crowd? 🤣🤣 On November 1, I’ll be watching you from the sidelines while I’m working on another project—that’s right, $0 👌🏻😀
86
Replying to @Holochain
Makale okumaktan gına geldi artık, somut adımlar bekliyoruz.
1
2
215
Load more