🔥 Prosper p{VAULT} Trading Challenge is Live! 100K $PROS prize pool to grab. Trade p{VAULT}s on Prosper, climb the live leaderboard, and earn early Pioneer status on @pharos_network. 🔘 app.pros-per.xyz/

RABBITHOLE IS LIVE. 🐇 11 opportunities are live now. Choose your position 👇 app.rabbithole.gg/?utm_sourc… Trade tokenized stocks and metals through @beefyfinance on @RobinhoodApp Back BTC, ETH, SOL or HYPE outcomes on @Polymarket Provide USDC/USDT liquidity through @KyberNetwork

Well, @axisrobotics put real numbers on the board. That matters more than the usual vague TGE talk. - community sale at $100M FDV. $0.10...$100 to $100K tickets - 10% at TGE, then a 6 month cliff and linear unlock, and the vesting is conservative, not a free flip That is actually the point, they are pricing a data network, not a one week meme. and and the more interesting part is still the product, robots dont learn from tweets, they learn from trajectories. Axis is collecting that data from the browser and compounding it on @base... So sale terms tell you how they want holders to sit, the hub tells you why the token exists... I am covering the second part GG, keep clicking

⚡️ $DGAI is now live on @binance Alpha! A decentralized #AI smart network for cost-effective, reliable & verifiable AI.🚀

Referrals are only useful if users you bring in understand the standard @axisrobotics is a data network. Networks dont fail because too few people showed up, they fail because the median sample gets lazy - rushed approaches, unfinished places, tasks marked complete with motion no policy should copy, adding more of that does not compound intelligence It compounds noise. If you are going to invite users into hub, send craft with link. (i) Explain that run is the product. (ii) Explain that a signed trajectory with bad contact is still a bad trajectory (ii) Explain that switching scenes is more valuable than repeating one easy kitchen pick Community here isnt chorus lines under an announcement, it is the quality of the public set The team can generate tasks and verify completions, they cannot invent care after thousands of sloppy sessions are already in the pile. The compounding story only holds if contributors keep the floor high while the network grows, that part is on the people already inside

I keep seeing CEX vs brokerage thing framed as a replacement fight I don't think that's the useful version A normal brokerage is built around the share, wire in, session hours,we own the name. Dividend shows up if the company pays, most retail don't get a clean short + leverage loop on that same ticket Stock futures on @mexc is built around the price, usdt margin long or short. No share certificate or any voting rights and funding can still apply Liquidation is inside the product That's why it feels fast if you already live in perps and why it bites if you size it like a cash account. If you think about it, the broker question is "do I want the company" The futures question is "do I want the move." Those are not the same trade just because solana:Gny3adoMw3rdb38cvUAJdmbAUZBbBsvE4xRdQQRdQ6PR is on both screens 0 Fee on eligible @mexc stock futures pairs makes the round-trip cheaper, that's real if you actually trade the event. It does not wipe spread, wipe funding, make a 4pm print softer. So I'm not using a cex stock perp as a substitute IRA. I'm also not opening a brokerage wire for a 2hrs earnings look anyway, access got easier, the product still decides the risk #MEXC0808

Gm one thing I find interesting about the next AI cycle: The biggest winners might not only be the companies building models They might be the ones building the data networks behind them. For LLMs, the internet became the training ground. For robots, the real world is the training ground. But real-world data is fragmented, agreed? Different environments. Different tasks. Different robot embodiments. Scaling that problem requires a new approach. This is the part of @axisrobotics that I find most interesting - not just collecting robot data, but creating a system where human contributions can become part of the intelligence layer behind physical ai The idea is simple: Instead of robot intelligence being created only inside research labs... What if more people could contribute to the learning process? @axisrobotics is exploring a model where: - humans generate valuable robot experiences - those experiences improve AI systems - contributors become part of the development loop The next generation of AI may not just be built by engineers. It may be shaped by a much larger community lock in with @axisrobotics, we are so early😎

Been seeing a lot of discussions around "stocks on crypto platforms" lately.. Most of arguments seem to focus on one thing: "Is this the same as buying stocks through a broker?" But I think that question misses the bigger picture The more interesting question is: What problem is each product actually trying to solve? Because investors are not always looking for the same thing. Some people want ownership Some want short-term exposure around market events Some want flexibility and faster access and some just want different ways to manage their positions This is where I think the conversation around platforms like @mexc becomes more interesting.. The mistake many users make is judging every stock product by the ticker alone. Same company,different wrapper, different risk, different purpose A realstock, a tokenized stock, and a stock future may reference the same underlying asset, but the experience, mechanics and risks are completely different The interesting shift is not that crypto platforms are "replacing brokers" That conversation is probably too early. The bigger shift is that market access is becoming more modular. Users are starting to choose tools based on their intention: Do I want ownership? Do I want active trading? Do I want flexibility? Do I want exposure to a market movement? For me, that is the more useful way to look at this evolution. Not: "which platform wins?" But: "which product actually fits the job?" Because in the end, understanding the wrapper might matter more than recognizing the ticker anyway just trying to highlight that the product structure matters as much as the asset itself DYOR, prodcuts involve risk #MEXC0808

If ai models disappeared tomorrow, the web would still exist If every robot lab disappeared tomorrow, where does physical ai get its next million demonstrations? That question is the whole @axisrobotics thesis Browser teleop + ego data + on-chain provenance who else is actually answering it? (the future of robotics will be built on data)