Today in the @TheLancet, we UK geneticists argue: "Population screening requires robust evidence—genomics is no exception" @annekeluc, @HelenVFirth, @GeneticBill, @carolinefwright, @mgtmccartney, @wilkie_lab, @RobinLachmann,@group_tomlinson,@lucymedgen authors.elsevier.com/a/1iD4W…
10
69
165
47,607
Newborn screening is something that people get passionate about; just how disruptive will would whole genome sequencing be? Coming Jan 5th 2024 linktr.ee/jimd_podcasts

Dec 8, 2023 · 7:38 AM UTC

1
3
8
1,055
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Screening should improve survival (or health-related quality of life), do more good than harm and offer value for the health care resource expended. Very happy if it is “disruptive” (whatever than means) if it is well evidenced through well-controlled studies as attaining above…
1
2
5
591
I have no skin in this game. We certainly discuss the impact of technology on screening. Tandem MS brought about a revolution, genomics offers another new technology and another potential revolution.
157