Here’s what Mike really thinks about White people.

I think in the past governments were hesitant to kill everyone in sight because of the moral dilemma that comes with killing your fellow countrymen. Now you just have Africans destroying a city they shouldn’t even be in. There is no reason to tolerate this

Watch this 80-second clip of ITV’s coverage of the 50th anniversary of VE Day from London in 1995 and weep for what we have lost. What we have thrown away in just three decades. Damn forever the politicians who allowed this to happen and the media class that was complicit.

Please leave your muslamic rayguns in the mosque

They're in our judiciary, they're in our schools, they're in our healthcare, they're everywhere, and they are not working on our side, they're against us

We endure this ridiculous dichotomy where life in the UK is increasingly sanitised - comedy, free speech, football culture, art, etc. Whilst previously inconceivable crimes - like the rape of a dying homeless woman - are absorbed into news cycles as part of modern life with less and less shock and urgency.

Islam, as practiced by millions of Muslims in Britain, is entirely incompatible with our British way of life.

The people in charge of us and their useful idiots just underneath them, find this issue a bit of a head scratcher and don't really know what to do with it. That tells me a lot of what I need to know about them.

I’ve seen modern China likened to 19th century Britain, as a rapidly industrialising power. Ironically we are starting to resemble 19th century China. The parallels are uncanny. Let me walk you through our own Century of National Humiliation… 🧵

kirk demonstrated that the public killing of your enemy is energizing for your side and demoralizing to your opponents, at a primal, tribal level. the great cry over this livestream comes from an instinctual understanding of this fact. be very suspicious of those who agree.

Is that what we are doing now, pretending that absolutely dogshit speeches were the best speech we've ever heard? Doesn't matter that the speech was shit if the narrative is that it was good. There is no substance to any of this. It is all beneath contempt.

'I don't want to explain' This is it in a nutshell, 'I don't want to explain the crime I have committed, nor the remedy.'

The left have imported millions of people from the Third World, lavished them with benefits, and then told them that the “nasty” right-wing parties will take those benefits away unless you vote for us. Sinister, but effective.

It's remarkable that a woman can complain about free speech in Britain while supporting execution for blasphemy in Saudi Arabia. This might be one of those paradox of tolerance situations.

The mindset of the state is quite conspicuously that of a bully who metes out as much punishment as the meekest members of society will tolerate, while by contrast keeping a wide berth from provoking those most likely to vociferously protest. It is a system under which those most inclined to obey the law receive double and triple helpings thereof, and those disinclined to do so are avoided or paid off at the expense of taxpayers and the rest of society. This is known as Low Hanging Fruit syndrome. An everyday analogy is the stories of tram and train conductors who are discretely instructed to avoid checking the tickets of people they suspect will kick off. We literally subsidise the decay of our own society while progressives lecture and tone police us all the way down into hell. I'll leave you with the tale of The Old Man and the Butter Knife that exemplifies the Pathological Bully State, so you may judge for yourselves the terrible power that Leviathan brings to bear — yet only as long as the object of its powers are the weak and the helpless. Behold, the Liberal Leviathan.

Putting police officers on the streets to facilitate illegal migration is the act of a state which behaves as if locked in a counterinsurgency campaign against its own people.

So the message of the Conservative Party conference was: “All we care about is money and that we’re ruled by brown people”

To even debate them is to help them move the Overton window left from "should the English be prioritised in England?" to "do the English even exist?" Don't engage. Proceed loudly with certainty that we know who we are and we know we deserve primacy here. Step over their bullshit

One day, Muslims in France will burn down the Louvre, just like they are burning schools and churches with impunity right now. No one in power will stop them.

It's the trans debate again. Unusual cases (people with Klinefelter's in the trans debate or true part-Anglo Anglophiles here) wheeled out disingenuously to cause confusion so that identities can be undermined while they ignore 99.9% of the argument