This is a must watch, regarding Thomas Markle Senior, not mine but from YouTube, I’ve just seen it and think it needs to be shared! Excellent journalism! Well done to this lady! youtu.be/-Dr_68uA5DY?is=SdrJ…

This is a very long post about the news of the day, publicly made by an attorney on another site who frequently creates updates on H's very compete legal disputes. It is a very important read and contains many details I had not heard until I read this, it also contains many fresh perspectives. ======== Someone makes an accusation of sexual abuse, and their story sounds very credible—because who wouldn’t believe something like that? Only a monster, right? After all, no one would make such an accusation if it weren’t true. That is what a great many people believe—that such an accusation would not be made if it were not true. But I have come across the fact that when something is presented in such a way that any criticism against it is viewed as "monstrous," that is precisely when it should be questioned the most. And when I say "question," I mean that cases like these are precisely the ones that require the most investigation. Let’s start with something some of us have had to do: moving. Thomas Markle was living in Rosarito, Mexico. In early May 2025, he officially moved to the Philippines. Together with his son, Thomas Jr., he settled into an apartment in Cebu City, seeking a more affordable cost of living and medical care following the health issues he was already dealing with. In early 2025, weary of media harassment and seeking a lower cost of living, Thomas decided to permanently leave his home in Mexico and move to the Philippines. Before the trip, he began getting rid of his belongings and packing what remained into four cardboard boxes, which ended up being stored abroad. That is the story Thomas Jr. is telling. But the way those boxes were moved—and who had access to them—is not only unclear; it is also at the heart of the ongoing legal dispute between the Markle siblings. Let’s be clear about one thing: Thomas Sr. didn’t send those boxes, Thomas Jr. did. He took care of it; Thomas Sr. was too ill to do so. Didn’t Thomas Jr. check those boxes? It only makes sense to do so—just look at the shipping cost! Imagine spending all that money, only to discover that your father had filled them with candy wrappers. Now, regarding such a shipment—did no one check the contents of a box as soon as it arrived in the Philippines? I once shipped a box from Spain to Santiago via FedEx... it was incredibly expensive! I had to seal it in the presence of a FedEx representative, and then open it in the presence of a representative from Correos Chile. I had to verify that everything had arrived in good condition and that there were no grounds for a complaint. If Thomas Sr. wanted to transport those boxes—at such a huge financial cost—from Mexico to the Philippines, is it really the case that no one opened them for over a year? Now, has anyone considered a crucial detail in all of this? It was Thomas Jr. who sent the material. So yes, he does run the risk of going to prison. Under the strict legal framework governing international cybercrimes, an individual who transmits child sexual abuse material across borders can indeed face serious criminal charges, regardless of who originally owned the material. So, it’s not enough to just say, "Oops! Look, some material turned up." The issue here is that Thomas Jr. sent those boxes; he was the one with access to them; and he is the one who supposedly discovered something inside them—in a storage unit registered in his own name. Therefore, the question arises: didn’t Thomas Jr. check those boxes before sending them to the Philippines? If he cannot provide a very good explanation, he is in serious trouble. This makes the photograph of Thomas Jr. reporting his father—which has surfaced—highly significant. That also seems strange. Who goes to the trouble of taking photos while reporting a crime like this? Someone trying to create an alibi, perhaps, or looking to absolve themselves of something? A forensic analysis of file creation and modification dates will be the sole factor in determining whether Thomas Jr. remains in the role of an exemplary citizen or becomes an accused party. Now, here’s the thing: one of the issues with Thomas Jr. is his claim that he opened those boxes because he was looking for a phone. Consider this: he reportedly stated that he knew there were old mobile phones among his father’s belongings, as Thomas Sr. was a known hoarder of technology and electronic gadgets—a habit stemming from his time working as a television lighting director. He claims that he opened the boxes for the sole purpose of looking for a used mobile phone to give to the father of his Filipina girlfriend, who needed a device. Interestingly, Thomas Markle Sr. officially retired from Hollywood in 2011 I don’t doubt that a phone from 2011 would still turn on—my Nokia 3310 does. But would it actually work? I had to give up my own Nokia in 2018 because, here in Chile, changes were made to the native GSM/2G network infrastructure, and my SIM card stopped working. It seems Thomas Markle had even older phones... but would they still be functional? Philippines isn’t a developed country, but honestly—isn’t it just being incredibly cheap to gift someone a phone from 2008, or even 2000? Then, I ran into this issue myself: the battery. Lithium-ion batteries from phones dating back to 2011—if left abandoned in boxes for years—undergo a process of extreme chemical degradation. In the vast majority of cases, they swell, become sulfated, or lose their ability to hold a charge entirely, making it impossible to turn on the device without keeping it permanently plugged into a power source or replacing the battery with a new one. I’m currently frantically searching for a battery for my 2013 Galaxy Note 3 which is the one I inherited in 2021 and use as a media player. When a mobile phone (such as the aforementioned LG) spends years stored in a cardboard box in a warehouse in the Philippines—a country with extreme humidity and tropical heat—its battery undergoes an accelerated degradation process. Thomas Jr. alleges that the explicit video appeared on the screen as soon as the device was turned on. In 2011, screens did not feature intelligent auto-play systems upon startup; to view a file, a user had to manually navigate through internal folders or MicroSD cards. And that’s assuming the video app keeps working. Apps often stop working because they are outdated. Well, Thomas Jr. knew that those boxes contained old cell phones... so, he knew that, yet he didn't check them before packing them up? I did a thorough check of the old cell phones at my place—turning each one on—and sent the ones that didn't work off to be recycled. But Thomas Jr. claims he knew nothing about what was in those boxes, even though he also says he knew they contained an old cell phone... So, did he know or didn't he? And as for the letter that MM allegedly received... it’s absurd. It’s complete nonsense. The London Metropolitan Police has no legal power or authority to investigate crimes committed in Rosarito (Mexico) by a U.S. citizen. If anyone had wanted to report Thomas Markle in 2018, the Met would have been the worst place in the world to do so, as they would have had to immediately refer the report to the FBI or the Mexican police (FGR). MM states that the letter reached the Royalty and Specialist Protection (RaSP) unit. This unit of the Met does not investigate ordinary or international sexual offenses; its sole function is the physical protection of—and the assessment of security threats (such as stalkers or terrorists) against—members of the Royal Family. If the Met received that letter in 2018, it did not conduct a criminal "investigation" in Mexico. The only action the RaSP could have taken was to classify the letter as a "reputational or security risk" to the new duchess (who had just married in May 2018) and—in a completely irregular manner (which is why they are currently under internal investigation)—show the letter to Meghan to warn her about the impending scandal. Let this be absolutely clear: an investigation was underway, yet no charges had been filed. According to MM, a letter regarding Thomas Markle—concerning an alleged investigation—was sent to the Met. If MM’s account is accurate, then by handing over a file or letter containing serious accusations made by a foreign national to a third party—in a country other than the one where the person under investigation resides—the police committed a grave violation of UK privacy laws, regardless of the fact that the recipient was the individual’s daughter. This exposes the Metropolitan Police to heavy financial penalties from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and provides a legal basis for Thomas Markle Sr. or his lawyers to file a civil lawsuit against the Met for moral damages, defamation, and the unlawful disclosure of confidential information. The most significant institutional consequence is the damage to Scotland Yard’s public reputation. The British public and legal analysts are sharply questioning why the Royal Protection Command acted as a private public-relations filter for the Sussexes—concealing a report of a serious crime and handing it over to the family, rather than transparently referring the matter to the appropriate international agencies (such as the FBI). There are some truly vile people in this world. If you follow the news from Chile, you’ll know there is a massive controversy regarding the reduction of sentences for individuals convicted of sexual offenses against minors. Since March, 56 such convicts—without any formal judicial review—have managed to secure this benefit, sparking criticism from both the opposition and the ruling coalition. I am currently feeling a level of rage and disgust that you cannot even imagine, because these convicted individuals filed legal petitions for the protection of constitutional rights to obtain this benefit. Disgust and rage—I don’t even want to read the news story; I simply cannot bear it, for reasons that go beyond the scope of this space. However, this accusation against Thomas Markle Sr. is very strange. Even a superficial analysis reveals that the story as we currently know it doesn’t really hold up. Based on my own personal experience, what Thomas Jr. has claimed just doesn’t add up. To me, it makes no sense—because I know what it’s like to send items from one country to another, and I also know what it’s like to own a mobile phone from the 2000s. And if the story of Thomas Jr. already made no sense, the situation with MM is simply absurd—absurd from start to finish. The narrative regarding the family rift from 2018 has been retroactively altered to align with the current scandal of 2026. And that, I believe, is the key detail. Why has MM done this? What is she aiming to achieve? Meghan Markle disclosed information regarding the Metropolitan Police because, in her hierarchy of priorities, clearing her reputation in the face of an accusation as monstrous as abandoning her sick father was infinitely more urgent than upholding Scotland Yard’s internal protocols. Much like in 2021—when she failed to anticipate that the head of the Church of England would publicly refute her claims to safeguard the integrity of his institution—she once again assumed that London’s Metropolitan Police would remain silent so as not to fuel the scandal. This is really ugly.

Well for what it’s worth, I don’t believe one word of any of this, Thomas Senior has been set up by his scheming, lying son and daughter, for their own benefit, her for sympathy and win points with the U.K. people, and the other cretin is after just money, as he always is, he squeezed his father dry and now he has found a way use him instead! I feel so sorry for Thomas Senior - I’ve always thought he was a kind, sincere man, and many people who genuinely know him, say he is! I hope those two selfish ‘kids’ of his get jailed for fraud!

GIRLS AS YOUNG AS 13 WERE BEING RAPED AND SOLD FOR SEX WHILE IN BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL'S CARE. WHEN THE WOMAN WHO INVESTIGATED THEIR ABUSE ACCUSED THE COUNCIL OF BURYING THE EVIDENCE, JESS PHILLIPS WAS BIRMINGHAM'S APPOINTED VICTIMS' CHAMPION. WHEN COUNCIL OFFICIALS DECLARED THERE HAD BEEN NO COVER-UP, SHE WAS STILL THERE. WEEKS LATER, SHE BECAME AN MP. These were children entrusted to Birmingham City Council for their protection. Dr Jill Jesson's investigation documented rape allegations, beatings, burns, pregnancies and girls taking overdoses. The council's own researcher found that Social Services had no systematic response to allegations of rape, but was concerned about protecting itself from bad publicity. Then, in November 2014, Jesson publicly accused Birmingham City Council of burying her findings. She said references to the ethnicity of the men had been removed and copies of her report ordered destroyed. JESS PHILLIPS WAS BIRMINGHAM'S FIRST VICTIMS' CHAMPION. She had been appointed in 2012. In April 2015, senior council officer Peter Hay acknowledged that an opportunity to protect children had been missed, but maintained there had been no cover-up. At the time, Phillips was still serving on Birmingham City Council. Weeks later, she was elected Labour MP for Birmingham Yardley. Phillips subsequently became the Government's Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls. JESS PHILLIPS MUST BE CALLED TO GIVE EVIDENCE BEFORE THE NATIONAL STATUTORY GROOMING GANGS INQUIRY. She must answer questions about her time as Birmingham's Victims' Champion and what action she took when the allegations about the Jesson Report resurfaced. ________ AND BIRMINGHAM TODAY. 143 children identified as at risk of, or experiencing, sexual exploitation. 98 live investigations. Six confirmed grooming gangs. Two private-hire drivers stripped of their licences following police intelligence concerning potential sexual offences against children. Birmingham is finally on the national inquiry's list. But the fight now is over what evidence Baroness Longfield obtains and who she requires to answer for the decisions made. THE COUNCIL HAD A VICTIMS' CHAMPION WHEN THE ALLEGATIONS RESURFACED. THE PUBLIC DESERVES TO KNOW WHAT SHE DID. My latest investigation follows the evidence from the girls in Birmingham's care homes through to the council's handling of the report and Jess Phillips's subsequent political career. Read it here; redwallandtherabble.co.uk/th… _________ The National Inquiry is entering the phase that will decide not just where it goes, but what it is prepared to confront once it gets there. Birmingham proves why that matters. We fought to get the city onto the list. Now, before the first witnesses have even been heard, a Pakistani politician is already trying to decide which questions should be pushed out of focus. That is why the pressure cannot stop at getting places named. Red Wall and the Rabble is now more than 15,000 strong. In the last three months, more than 1,000 people have committed to a paid subscription, and 250,000 people have read one of my investigations so far this year. We forced Oldham onto the list. We showed the way in Bradford. We campaigned relentlessly in Birmingham and across Wales, and both were named. None of it was handed to us. And now the next fight begins. Making sure the Inquiry actually asks the questions politicians and institutions spent decades avoiding. No political party funds this work. No institution stands behind me. Everything I publish remains free because the evidence needs to reach as many people as possible. The people who pay are the people who give me the independence to keep investigating, keep applying pressure and keep forcing these questions into the open. We set out to reach 2,000 paid subscribers. We still need another 1,000 more. If you want this Inquiry to go where the evidence leads, regardless of who it embarrasses, who it exposes or which political interests it threatens, become one of the next 1,000. 🔴 Subscribe here 👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja Miah MBE See less

Why am I getting this dreaded feeling, that bastard Burnham has already agreed to sign us back into the EU ???? 😡😡

Britain’s had enough

Suspect in RAF Fairford incident called police shortly before arrest youtu.be/B-uvsEjRePQ?is=vfco… via @YouTube

It was always the plan there are enough of them now the emboldened language comes very easy. What time is it in the UK?

🚨💥PROTESTS ERUPT IN GREECE 🇬🇷 GREECE IS PARALYZED; airports at a standstill, ports at a standstill, factories at a standstill, trains at a standstill, EVERYTHING IS AT A STANDSTILL. The silence about it is strange. It's one of the biggest events. THIS IS EPIC 💥🔥 All of Europe has been betrayed beyond all comprehension and now all of Europe is waking up fast, as shown by these massive protests in Greece 🔥 They won't show it to you in the Media. THE WORLD IS RISING. IT'S TIME TO RESIST 🔥SHARE everywhere... THIS IS HUGE 👇🔥

POLICE WOKE TOMMY ROBINSON AT 2:50AM WITH A DEATH THREAT. HE’S STILL SPEAKING IN LONDON TODAY. That says a lot about the calibre of the man!! Police woke Tommy at twenty to three this morning and told him there’s a real and immediate threat to his life. Credible, they said. Wouldn’t tell him who. Admitted they can’t watch him around the clock. And he’s still going to London today to speak. That’s who he is. He speaks for a lot of people who’ve had enough. He takes on the lot that run this country and they hate him for it. That’s why he’s the one they come for. They wouldn’t think twice about taking him out he is a serious threat to the left wing establishment now. Tommy must be protected at all costs! I’m heading up to London today. Trafalgar Square. Survivors Day. This isn’t just about Tommy. It’s about standing with the survivors. Kids who were failed, families who were ignored, people who’ve been told to stay quiet for years. That’s the cause. That’s why we’re going. If you can get there, get there. If you can’t, share it. Let’s show up. Let’s stand with him and with them. See you up there. 🙏🇬🇧👏✌️

The boats are down! no mention to the planes flying in full of illegals

Decided to delete disgusting photo - hence the blur! There’s always one isn’t there! 😏

If you want to smash the gangs start with the RNLI and then move straight to the Home Office. @ShabanaMahmood @andyburnham

Fact check if you wish. The spiteful money hungry Spencer Scum decides to change history, waits for 30 years thinking those who may remember would not be around but desperate to grift before his target KC dies. He has underestimated our love &respect of PoW -we will protect PW!!

I’ve just read a headline in the Daily Mail referring to a chapter in the serialisation of Spencer’s book - saying ‘Royals ‘lack of care’ for Harry on day of Diana’s funeral! Now to me the first thing I thought of was why didn’t he mention William as well, then of course it dawned on me that Spencer and Harry seem to have developed a bond over this book and of course Harry would not like the idea of William outshining him - or in fact William being mentioned at all! Anyway, does this mean that Harry has supplied information to Earl Spencer for his book, which no doubt will be detrimental towards William and possibly the King, especially now that Charles made it clear Harry was ‘persona non grata’ whilst in the U.K. and purely a private citizen 😱 - I may be completely wrong but I can imagine Harry and his other half really enjoying ratting out his brother! If anyone has read, or is reading the book, perhaps you can let me know if William is being lambasted by his Uncle!

We are all praying for you Noah, please be safe! 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

".

All this business with Harry seems a little too quick to me - I just feel we are missing a big story here - Meghan made it clear she would not want to live in the U.K., Haz always said he loved living in the US - what’s changed their minds - well primarily I think they are looking for protection, not from physical attacks but from the law! Look at the charities and Archewell Foundation, monies donated to the Markles goes into their Foundation and is supposedly distributed to charities of their choice, but we have heard that the likes of Sentabale and Invictus, and others are struggling despite the millions that have been donated - so where does the money go - there are a lot of people now delving into this very complex spiders web - and there is talk that a lot of the money never reached the intended charities. Now perhaps I’m just cynical, but it it seems to me that Harry and his wife making a dash to the U.K. to set up home under the eye of the King, and maybe his protection, seems too coincidental, my feeling is that Trump has pre warned the King what could happen to Harry and his wife should the IRS, or whoever in the US deals with the money side of things, start looking too deeply into his sons charitable dealings. The fact also that having lost his case regarding the Daily Mail, which has left Harry out of pocket to the tune of 30 million or more, now means his funds are really at rock bottom and he can’t cover any loses in his businesses that might come to light! If he returned to the Royal fold he is protected by the Crown and his father, especially if he ends up taking on a minor roll working directly for the King, he would also be entitled to more security. This is purely my own thoughts and opinions, and I may be reading it all wrong - but this has all been kept under wraps for a reason, the above is my opinion for what it’s worth!

I reposted this BRILLIANT video the other day but it did not get much traction. This lovely lady EXPOSES newly installed Bloomberg Mayor of Manchester, Bev Craig, as PROTECTING GROOMING GANGS! THIS VIDEO should be EVERYWHERE! I would LOVE to buy this brave lady MANY drinks. If anyone knows who she is or her channel name, please let me know, so I can credit her awesome work.